Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Coronavirus


Bjornebye

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, SasaS said:

True, but we are not talking California but Bay Area alone, which is 3 times the population density on New York State. And there were no measures in place for almost 2 months since the first cases.

I think you would need to remove NYC to have any comparison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, SasaS said:

True, but we are not talking California but Bay Area alone, which is 3 times the population density of New York State. And there were no measures in place for almost 2 months since the first cases.

Didn't the west coast have the weaker strain of the virus, bizarrely? New York and Europe got the deluxe version apparently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 1892-LFCWasBorn said:

https://twitter.com/piersmorgan/status/1254391282711101440?s=19

 

Ha ha ha.

 

Twitter not linking again  Pfffft. 

 

Haha good handbag session, thanks for the link. Sadly Morgan seems to have blocked him so it's over now, would've liked them to carry on showing each other up for a while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, SasaS said:

It was a comparison, it is still a fairly hig density. The same as the state of New Jersey.

Cali's numbers are pretty close to NJ in deaths v cases I think, that is probably because of LA County - which questions the multi strain theory. The Bay Area does seem low overall, agreed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, TheHowieLama said:

Cali's numbers are pretty close to NJ in deaths v cases I think

Sorry, but how is this relevant? My point is that you have a high population density urban area with a relatively low spread of epidemic despite the fact the virus appeared comparatively early and spread unchecked for some 2 months before any measures were introduced. This sounds baffling because in other similar areas it spread much more quickly.

 

One explanation can be that other factors may need to be in place for it to spread, not just a particular type / level of suppression / containment measures and population density, maybe you need a critical number of infections within a relatively tightly linked population group, without which the virus can wonder around the town for months without doing too much damage.   

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SasaS said:

 

One explanation can be that other factors may need to be in place for it to spread, not just a particular type / level of suppression / containment measures and population density, maybe you need a critical number of infections within a relatively tightly linked population group, without which the virus can wonder around the town for months without doing too much damage.   

The viral load theory. Makes sense and would explain higher number of health care workers in most locations.

 

On the first part, my feeling is the virus was present in many places very early on. They are now suggesting as early as December. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Been watching some U.S news channels today. What's going on over there is just fucking mental putting aside the mad cunt aka Trump.

 

Their testing is an absolute shambles. Most of them completely useless or unreliable.

 

4 states have re-opened with more looking to follow.

 

Already at 55k deaths. To put things into perspective, 58k died during Vietnam.

 

They will easily surpass 100k if they carry on with this madness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...