Quantcast
Coronavirus - Page 306 - GF - General Forum - The Liverpool Way Jump to content
Bjornebye

Coronavirus

Recommended Posts

68 bed emergency field hospital in Central Park equipped with ICU and respirators. Operational by Tuesday morning.

 

EUS45yqWoAAPVGn.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Gnasher said:

Isn’t herd immunity- with a vaccine - the ultimate goal? So the virus has no one to leap to and therefore dies out? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Rico1304 said:

Isn’t herd immunity- with a vaccine - the ultimate goal? So the virus has no one to leap to and therefore dies out? 

Yes I think so, i believe it creates a firewall to protect the vulnerable as it cannot leap around new victims.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:

Isn’t herd immunity- with a vaccine - the ultimate goal? So the virus has no one to leap to and therefore dies out? 

Yes. To try and do it by letting the disease run through a population sounds extremely risky, especially as we don't know why it predominantly kills those 50 and over. For example, could there be a cohort of people in younger age groups who have the same vulnerable characteristic(s) but haven't been subjected to the infection as yet?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Mudface said:

Yes. To try and do it by letting the disease run through a population sounds extremely risky, especially as we don't know why it predominantly kills those 50 and over. For example, could there be a cohort of people in younger age groups who have the same vulnerable characteristic(s) but haven't been subjected to the infection as yet?

I thought the reason it mainly kills the over 70s is because in most cases it is not strong enough to kill someone virile and in good health. It also attacks the respiratory system and the respiratory system in older people is generally weaker, plus it mainly kills people with other underlying symptoms. I may of course be underestimating the virus.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, TK421 said:

Sickening disregard for human life. 

I dont know. a kid comes into contact with the virus, becomes infected, gets tested, stays home for so many days then can no longer pass it on to an older more vulnerable person. The virus eventually has nowhere to go. I think that's the plan.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Gnasher said:

I dont know. a kid comes into contact with the virus, becomes infected, gets tested, stays home for so many days then can no longer pass it on to an older more vulnerable person. The virus eventually has nowhere to go. I think that's the plan.

Well the main problem is that it appears to be asymptomatic for a number of days and possibly during the entirety of the infection, so the younger person could be passing it on to multiple vulnerable people before they even realise they have it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Mudface said:

Well the main problem is that it appears to be asymptomatic for a number of days and possibly during the entirety of the infection, so the younger person could be passing it on to multiple vulnerable people before they even realise they have it.

Yea true it's got a long incubation period, however I think ( I might be wrong) that they hope it will some run out of victims and the young can banish it quite quickly.  As a vacation seems way off if a 70 year old teacher has a choice in September of teaching 20 kids who have had the virus or 20 kids who havnt which is the safer option? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, Gnasher said:

I dont know. a kid comes into contact with the virus, becomes infected, gets tested, stays home for so many days then can no longer pass it on to an older more vulnerable person. The virus eventually has nowhere to go. I think that's the plan.

I mean it might work, yeah. People have been dumbed down enough to vote for economic self harm with Brexit, maybe they'll be up for physical harm and death with herd immunity.  Count me out , though. I'll wait for the vaccine. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The thing with the herd immunity stuff is it’s a lot easier to volunteer strangers for it than to send your own into the breach and just cross your fingers they’re not one of the people who fare disastrously with the virus.

 

Its a bit like the “Well, the planet needs a cull anyway” stuff you hear. Not yet met anyone popping their hand up to volunteer themselves, their parents or kids to be fed into the wood-chipper*.


* Mother-in-laws and spouses not included in this point.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

Are you assuming they're foreign because of their names? Wow.

Point scoring over deaths. 

 

But yeah SD is ok really. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Gnasher said:

 

Quote

Perhaps two weeks from now, healthy people under 40 could return to work provided that they have no vulnerable people in their household. Perhaps a week after that, healthy people aged 40-50 could join them, and nurseries could reopen.

 

I think he sounds fucking mental.

 

 

This is highly likely to be wrong as well :

 

gD6bvcP.jpg

 

By the time it gets to October we should be way more prepared to deal with this and could be instantly ready to carry out mass testing and contact tracing (neither of which are even mentioned on the graph!) for anything that starts up again.

 

There's already talk of us getting hold of millions of testing kits shortly, even if that fails by the time October is here we'd surely have some form of doing this which means that the second surge in cases on that graph would no longer apply. The gov and health services would have a lot of extra knowledge of what has and hasn't worked in other countries by October as well, along with half a year to prepare for it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another couple of bits on where this came from :

 

gD6bvcP.jpg

 

The report states that :

Quote

The measures used to achieve suppression might also evolve over time. As case numbers fall, it becomes more feasible to adopt intensive testing, contact tracing and quarantine measures akin to the strategies being employed in South Korea today.

 

But it's only brought up right at the end of the report as a suggestion in the discussion section.

 

And this is from The Guardian on the early strategy of the Imperial College and modelling in general :

 

Quote

The modelling from Imperial College that underpinned the government’s belief that the nation could ride out the epidemic by letting the infection sweep through, creating “herd immunity” on the way, was more troubling.


The model, based on 13-year-old code for a long-feared influenza pandemic, assumed that the demand for intensive care units would be the same for both infections. Data from China soon showed this to be dangerously wrong, but the model was only updated when more data poured out of Italy, where intensive care was swiftly overwhelmed and deaths shot up.

Nor was that the only shortcoming of the Imperial model. It did not consider the impact of widespread rapid testing, contact tracing and isolation, which can be used in the early stages of an epidemic or in lockdown conditions to keep infections down to such an extent that when restrictions are lifted the virus should not rebound.

It is not a question of whether models are flawed but in which ways are they flawed, and models can still be enormously valuable if their shortcomings are appreciated. As with other sources of information, however, they should never be used alone.

“Models are a useful input among many when you are doing public policy, but you have to use triangulation. You have to look across different sources of information and not just rely on one. It’s more messy and complex than just saying ‘OK here’s a number’, but you get to a more accurate answer for our world,” Sridhar said.

Never have the words of the British statistician George Box rung truer than in this pandemic: “All models are wrong, but some are useful.”

 

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2020/mar/25/coronavirus-exposes-the-problems-and-pitfalls-of-modelling

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Available Subscriptions

  • Last Match Report

  • Latest Posts

    • John Barnes says he does believe Liverpool will regret missing out on the signature of Timo Werner because he was not fully committed to the joining them.

      Chelsea have agreed a deal to sign the RB Leipzig striker, despite the widely held view that the Reds were in prime position to seal the transfer.
        The news may have come as a shock as well as some disappointment to Liverpool fans who were looking forward to have another class forward joining the ranks.

      But it seems the only set of individuals not surprised were the club hierarchy themselves who were not rushed into reacting and engage in a bidding war with the West London club.

      John Barnes believes there is a clear reason for that as he explained to BonusCodeBets(via The Mirror).

      “Liverpool want players that want to play for Liverpool. I'm sure a lot of people were after [Virgil] van Dijk, but he wanted to come to Liverpool.

      "If they don't get a move on and Manchester City, Arsenal or Chelsea come in for him and he decides to go there, that's not the sort of player you want anyway.

      "Because he'll just go where they're going to pay him more money or he wasn't that committed to wanting to come to play for Jurgen Klopp at Liverpool.

      Jürgen Klopp does things in a very measured and strategic way, almost testing the nerve of the player regarding how much he wants to play for the club.

      Patience is the key and when they do sign on the dotted line, Klopp doesn’t just throw them to the wolves, instead he waits for the right time to bed them into the lineup.

      It could be the case that Klopp believed that Werner would grow impatient with that type of process, and therefore he was not the right man for the club.  

      Barnes believes that Werner may have failed the Klopp test and cited recent examples of World Class talents who were more than willing to join the Reds.

      "I don't think they have to get a move on, they didn't get a move on with Van Dijk or Alisson and a lot of people wanted them to, it's because they wanted to come. 

      “This is a test to see if he really wants to come and play for Jurgen Klopp at Liverpool.

      “Considering how things have panned out it seems Werner didn't pass Klopp's test, but at the same time Liverpool - who didn't meet the deadline - failed the forward's too.”

      Former Liverpool captain Jamie Redknapp agreed with his former club not purchasing Werner and questioned where he would fit in the lineup.

      “Who is going to replace. He’s a really good player, but we don’t know right now, is he better than Mane, Firmino, Salah?

      “It’s one of the best front three in the world right now so he doesn’t want to go somewhere and be a number two or a sub.

      “Will they regret it? You don’t know but that is what he has got to do. He has got to make Liverpool regret that decision, or at least make them think ‘I wish we had signed him.

      “For Liverpool, they have got to look at it and think, if you bring someone like him in it could upset the balance of them and maybe they might think, ‘would it be worth the risk to bring in another player.

      “They have three top-class players who don’t get many injuries, why risk upsetting balance.”



       
      View full article
    • He like Pulisic can play left or right... They will let go of Willian and Pedro I reckon. 
    • I wonder if catcher et al are fully paid up members of qAnon? 
    • Positives - Covid immunity (allegedly) Negatives - Rapey (allegedly)   Bringing him in would be instead of Werner - so why buy him? Bench?      
  • Latest Round Up

  • Popular Contributors

  • Football Betting Site Betway
  • Footstock
  • Online Bingo
×