Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Coronavirus


Bjornebye

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Bjornebye said:

Thats your new go to saying is it. Deep down inside you know you've been found out for being a selfish dick so instead of facing it head on you're throwing accusations of bullying around. It wont take me long to find a few posts where you called me a cunt without any provocation if I could be arsed wasting any more of my day on you. 

 

I still don't know what direct question you asked me but it appears A-Red has already handed you your arse. 

 

 

 

Oh my question is whats your favourite Blancmange song? 

giphy.gif?cid=5e2148863t3fsrqlnqh710yexu

 

And it’s Blind Vision. Quite apt really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheHowieLama said:

Mate, that is from Mar 2020 - the man is a scientist - his opinions change based on new information.

 

What he has most recently stated is no one can say where it came from. I am pretty sure there are thousands of folks working now to figure that out and his opinion will continue to change.

 

Okay, if that's too far back for you, he said in May of 2021 that the probability the virus came from natural causes was "highly likely". Even now, when we all know it came from the lab, he's still trying to play devil's advocate to cover his own tracks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Skidfingers McGonical said:

giphy.gif?cid=5e2148863t3fsrqlnqh710yexu

 

And it’s Blind Vision. Quite apt really.

Out of rep x 

 

Thats how I pictured you the other day when you sent me a PM apologising (despite not needing to apologise over some tit for tat bollocks on the internet) 

 

Yep wow we agree. Tuuuuuune 

 

Now sod off before I leave your arse dustier than a twister at a Kansas Super-Bowl. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Joke before you start crying about bullying etc) 

 

... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:

Based on what?  It’s mad.  

What has he lied/misled for? who does it benefit? then add both labs in Wuhan were collecting and doing research on corona viruses from bats including the case from 2012 were miners died. 

The fact that if you mentioned the lab leak theory early on you were labelled a nut or colander etc this was mostly down to one paper that later was found to have more than a few holes.

Fauci says the RaTG13 type that is 96 odd % related to what we know as Sars-CoV2 is not close enough yet he doesn't mention or explain why the type BtCoV/4991 is 98 % related and derived from RaTG13 these samples are from the said mine.

It isn't a rare event for a lab to have leaks but it is a rare event for a pathogen/virus to evolve rapidly in an animal host and this host has never been found.

Chinas bat scientist (Zeng Li Shi) that worked at these labs has been found to leave some things out and contradict Fauci.

Seems to be a lot of strange goings on with regard to BtCoV/4991 like the fact Shi had it in 2013 and was most likely doing GOF research with it again something Fauci was found to be lying/misleading about.

I feel there's enough out there to point a finger at Fauci. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 3 Stacks said:

Fauci is a fa cheem. And a fenook. Maybe a mulignan as well, his skin's kind of dark.

it's this kind of shit that I can't be arsed with. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These last couple of pages show exactly what I was talking about earlier when I replied to Mudface.

 

Your sources:  impeccable and infallible 

Our sources:  Cunts, quacks, conspiracy nuts, far right loons, fact-checked wrong uns

 

You see, you people - you know who you are - you'll never know what Peter McCullough has to say about myocarditis, even though he's one of the most qualified and experienced heart specialists in the world.  Rather than watch his videos on myocarditis and its link to the Covid vaccines, as I suggested, you'd prefer to run straight to your favourite fact checker via big tech Google (whose side do you think they're on?) and instantly discredit him on the basis of something he said that's entirely unrelated to myocarditis. 

 

Rather than watch his videos and listen to him speak at length and in depth about the subject matter, and take your time because that would require real effort, in this social media age you'd prefer to read the first fact check article you come across and instantly dismiss him, within minutes or even seconds. Me, I'll listen to all sources and spend time with ALL of them, even Chris Whitty.  Which one of us is learning more, me or you? 

 

Everyone is right sometimes and has something worthy to say, even Donald Trump.  He was ridiculed early on in the pandemic for wanting to restrict the borders on arrivals from China, he was called a racist for doing it and criticised by the World Health Organisation.  Nowadays, the whole world does it and it's a normal part of life.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Pureblood said:

These last couple of pages show exactly what I was talking about earlier when I replied to Mudface.

 

Your sources:  impeccable and infallible 

Our sources:  Cunts, quacks, conspiracy nuts, far right loons, fact-checked wrong uns

 

You see, you people - you know who you are - you'll never know what Peter McCullough has to say about myocarditis, even though he's one of the most qualified and experienced heart specialists in the world.  Rather than watch his videos on myocarditis and its link to the Covid vaccines, as I suggested, you'd prefer to run straight to your favourite fact checker via big tech Google (whose side do you think they're on?) and instantly discredit him on the basis of something he said that's entirely unrelated to myocarditis. 

 

Rather than watch his videos and listen to him speak at length and in depth about the subject matter, and take your time because that would require real effort, in this social media age you'd prefer to read the first fact check article you come across and instantly dismiss him, within minutes or even seconds. Me, I'll listen to all sources and spend time with ALL of them, even Chris Whitty.  Which one of us is learning more, me or you? 

 

Everyone is right sometimes and has something worthy to say, even Donald Trump.  He was ridiculed early on in the pandemic for wanting to restrict the borders on arrivals from China, he was called a racist for doing it and criticised by the World Health Organisation.  Nowadays, the whole world does it and it's a normal part of life.   

"Even Chris Whitty" 

 

Professor Chris Whitty is Chief Medical Officer (CMO) for England, the UK government's Chief Medical Adviser and head of the public health profession.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Pureblood said:

These last couple of pages show exactly what I was talking about earlier when I replied to Mudface.

 

Your sources:  impeccable and infallible 

Our sources:  Cunts, quacks, conspiracy nuts, far right loons, fact-checked wrong uns

 

You see, you people - you know who you are - you'll never know what Peter McCullough has to say about myocarditis, even though he's one of the most qualified and experienced heart specialists in the world.  Rather than watch his videos on myocarditis and its link to the Covid vaccines, as I suggested, you'd prefer to run straight to your favourite fact checker via big tech Google (whose side do you think they're on?) and instantly discredit him on the basis of something he said that's entirely unrelated to myocarditis. 

 

Rather than watch his videos and listen to him speak at length and in depth about the subject matter, and take your time because that would require real effort, in this social media age you'd prefer to read the first fact check article you come across and instantly dismiss him, within minutes or even seconds. Me, I'll listen to all sources and spend time with ALL of them, even Chris Whitty.  Which one of us is learning more, me or you? 

 

Everyone is right sometimes and has something worthy to say, even Donald Trump.  He was ridiculed early on in the pandemic for wanting to restrict the borders on arrivals from China, he was called a racist for doing it and criticised by the World Health Organisation.  Nowadays, the whole world does it and it's a normal part of life.   

https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/958916

 

I know you don't want to hear it, but we may have to use the dreaded "Q" word with Mr. McCullough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Pureblood said:

I just feel sorry for you that that's your first instinct, rather than to watch the video.

I am pledging to do my own research on this particular medical professional - starting with his wikipedia entry:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_A._McCullough

 

I will be looking into his last professional position at his alma mater Baylor University. Then I am going to the video.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bjornebye said:

Can you see any hypocrisy in your previous post here? any at all? 

No, not at all.  I've taken a great deal of time to listen to Chris Whitty and did a big essay on him, it took about twelve hours.

 

Whereas you've done a three second fact check on Peter McCullough. 

 

So it proves my point.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheHowieLama said:

I am pledging to do my own research on this particular medical professional - starting with his wikipedia entry:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_A._McCullough

 

I will be looking into his last professional position at his alma mater Baylor University. Then I am going to the video.

Repped for at least having the intention to do something other than fact check.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Pureblood said:

No, not at all.  I've taken a great deal of time to listen to Chris Whitty and did a big essay on him, it took about twelve hours.

 

Whereas you've done a three second fact check on Peter McCullough. 

 

So it proves my point.  

It doesn't though does it. What was the essay for? 

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...