Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Coronavirus


Bjornebye

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, A Red said:

Do all, some or no droplets get through a mask. You should answer really as it is central to your argument

 

Quite clearly many aerosols get through a mask. Edit: you can do the misting test Angry suggested yourself.

 

4 minutes ago, Nelly-Torres said:

You should have ordered some Clearasil for your scabby gob, since you're full of hot air and too scared to not wear a mask despite all your online bravado. 

 

Being accused of being scared by someone who blocked me on Facebook. Classic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, A Red said:

So not all? So you would agree a face mask reduces the risk of passing it on?

 

I would say it stands to reason that a mask will stop some aerosols. However, this would unquestionably be cancelled out by the fact that a mask wearer will produce more aerosols, due to them having to breathe that much harder.

 

5 minutes ago, Nelly-Torres said:

Whatever, Scabby Alonso. 

 

Hahaha, oh dear, what was that about online bravado?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

 

I would say it stands to reason that a mask will stop some aerosols. However, this would unquestionably be cancelled out by the fact that a mask wearer will produce more aerosols, due to them having to breathe that much harder.

 

You're very good at what you do, I'll give you that. So you believe wearing a mask makes you exhale and inhale more often, basically they make you pant, which in turn produces more droplets negating the effectiveness of the mask. Where is the evidence for this?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, TD_LFC said:

Oh you're the worst kind.

 

YOU people fight the good fight and stand up against the quackkery, but I can't join you obviously because I have too much to lose, but you people take the risks and I'll support you from a position of safety.

 

It's like the cunts telling people not to take the vaccine having taken it themselves.

Wallasey’s version of Tucker Carlson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, A Red said:

You're very good at what you do, I'll give you that. So you believe wearing a mask makes you exhale and inhale more often, basically they make you pant, which in turn produces more droplets negating the effectiveness of the mask. Where is the evidence for this?

 

Oh, I'll bet nobody's studied it in any great depth. I wish they would. I can only speak from personal experience of wearing a mask, which makes me breathe faster and deeper as I need to work that much harder to get sufficient air in.

 

Surely we can agree at least that breathing faster and more deeply will produce more aerosols.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

 

Oh, I'll bet nobody's studied it in any great depth. I wish they would. I can only speak from personal experience of wearing a mask, which makes me breathe faster and deeper as I need to work that much harder to get sufficient air in.

 

Surely we can agree at least that breathing faster and more deeply will produce more aerosols.

So you don't know. Why not err on the side of safety for your fellow human beings and recognise that a policy of mask wearing is probably best at the moment, when in close proximity to others, bearing in mind you admit they stop droplets and have no idea or evidence of how many they don't?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if we'll get accurate updates on all the deaths and injuries from these countries enforcing mandatory jabs?

 

Of course not.

 

Great how poor people are disadvantaged massively trying to pay fines for not getting a jab too while rich people can basically laugh and do whatever the fuck they want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...