Jump to content
Bjornebye

Coronavirus

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, cloggypop said:

How do you feel about far right shite being shared on this site? 

 

Didn't you spread the Swinson/squirrel stuff that was popularised by Brexit Party supporters?

 

Pot/kettle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, No2 said:

Have you got the answer to the very last question?

 

I only heard one question No2. What is the very last question as you heard it? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think many on the left and right could unite on agreeing that Klaus Schwab is an idiot and that his great reset is aimed at serving the elites.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From Naomi Klein :

 

Quote

Less a conspiracy theory than a conspiracy smoothie, the Great Reset has managed to mash up every freakout happening on the internet — left and right, true-ish, and off-the-wall — into one inchoate meta-scream about the unbearable nature of pandemic life under voracious capitalism. I’ve been doing my best to ignore it for months, even when various Reset “researchers” have insisted that all of this is an example of the shock doctrine, a term I coined a decade and a half ago to describe the many ways that elites try to harness deep disasters to push through policies that further enrich the already wealthy and restrict democratic liberties.

What Schwab and the WEF are doing with the Great Reset is both more subtle and more insidious. Schwab is, of course, absolutely right when he says that the pandemic has revealed many deadly structural failures of capitalism as usual, as does the accelerating climate crisis and the hoovering of the planet’s wealth up toward the Davos class, even in the midst of a global pandemic. But like the WEF’s earlier big themes, the Great Reset is not a serious effort to actually solve the crises it describes. On the contrary, it is an attempt to create a plausible impression that the huge winners in this system are on the verge of voluntarily setting greed aside to get serious about solving the raging crises that are radically destabilizing our world.

Why? For the same reason I keep hearing Facebook ads on NPR podcasts telling me how much Facebook wants to be regulated. Because if our corporate overlords can create this impression, it is less likely that governments will listen to the rising chorus of voices calling on them to do what is required to actually combat spiraling poverty, joblessness, climate breakdown, and informational degeneration: regulate the companies that have created these crises, and tax them, break them up, and, in some cases, put them under public control.

 

 

The Great Reset Conspiracy Smoothie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, cloggypop said:

Are you also one of the great reset conspiracy theorists? How do you feel about far right shite being shared on this site? 

How have you come to think it’s relevant to ask that question based on my question? 
 

It’s called an opposing view, nothing more. It’s not up to me to decide what should and should not be posted on here. Nor is it yours. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, ZonkoVille77 said:

Brilliant. 

 

Ministers 'fear coronavirus could be spread by farting in a confined space'

Ministers have privately pointed to evidence that suggests Covid-19 could be spread when an infected person breaks wind in a confined space, such as a toilet, it is reported

 

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/ministers-fear-coronavirus-could-spread-24609803.amp?__twitter_impression=true

Bum masks next probably. “Hey, you can’t come in here without a bum mask mate” maybe that England fan with a flare up his arse was trying to warn us. How quick we are to misjudge people.
 

I’m sure I read that they’ve been testing sewerage plants for levels of COVID for quite a while now. 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Iceman said:

 

I only heard one question No2. What is the very last question as you heard it? 

The last question was right before the video cuts, were you lying to me or the author? He hinted in the previous answer that it was the author, if he expanded on that then its a nothing to see here moment, hence the sharp finish to the video.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Nelly-Torres said:

They've started beating each other up now. I'm not sure that these people are really qualified to offer public health advice. 

 

https://mobile.twitter.com/Urban_Pictures/status/1418995611173625856

That angry little skin head cunt. Fuck me, I’ve never wanted to be a bizzie more - the chance to baton that little rat would be amazing. It was him causing all the in-fighting there. And the aggro with the police. Would

have loved a rozzer to butt the cunt with their helmet on, but he wouldn’t get close enough for that - just bounced on his toes screaming 5 yards away. What the fuck are they so angry about??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, cloggypop said:

Are you also one of the great reset conspiracy theorists? How do you feel about far right shite being shared on this site? 

Rico stuck a link from someone who'd  recently sacked from the Telegraph for racist comments the other day.

 

The article was by Julie Burchill and unsurprisingly it was a load of tosh.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Rico1304 said:

I LOVE Botox.  Here are my stand out Botox facts;

 

1) An amount of botulism that weighed the same as an egg would be enough to kill everyone on the planet. 
 

2) If you distilled all the Botox used in cosmetic treatments in one year down to its purest form it would weigh the same as a junior disprin tablet. 

 

353F5CA1-8775-4E31-A653-05B3BFA3BEFD.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, ZonkoVille77 said:

Brilliant. 

 

Ministers 'fear coronavirus could be spread by farting in a confined space'

Ministers have privately pointed to evidence that suggests Covid-19 could be spread when an infected person breaks wind in a confined space, such as a toilet, it is reported

 

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/ministers-fear-coronavirus-could-spread-24609803.amp?__twitter_impression=true

Fuck if I'm taking a lateral flow test for that...

 

 

Image

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

World beating spaffing up the wall...

 

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/covic-pandemic-ppe-waste-government-b1889914.html

 

'The government is wasting vast amounts of money PPE that is still “not fit for purpose” a year and a half into the pandemic, an influential committee of MPs has warned.

 

Official figures show nearly 7 per cent of all items purchased by the health department have failed quality checks while ministers are spending £6.7m every week to keep it stored.

 

An eye-watering 2.1 billion items have already been found unsuitable for use in medical settings and 10,000 shipping containers are still to be unpacked.

 

The same committee also warned of “significant financial risks for decades to come”, with the estimated lifetime cost of all the government’s Covid measures reaching £372bn in May 2021.

 

Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the Public Accounts Committee (PAC), said too much of the “eye-watering sums” of cash being spent to combat the pandemic were going to waste.

 

Labour called for an immediate public inquiry on the findings of the report.

 

In two separate reports, the committee said that a further 8.4 billion items of PPE on order from other parts of the world have still not arrived in the UK.

 

And it said the government did not have a credible plan for the excess PPE that was suitable for medical use, with no evidence of a robust plan for repurposing and distributing the stock properly.

 

Responding to the report, the government said there are “robust processes” in place to ensure taxpayer money is spent properly. It said less than 1 per cent of PPE it had ordered was unsuitable for any use at all, distinguishing between its suitability for medical use and other uses.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The CDC is recommending NOT using the PCR test because its, eh, not, eh, valid for detecting Covid 19, because it also picks up Flu. This is exactly what 'conspiracy theorists' had said all along about the PCR test. Flu may not have 'disappeared' last winter at all. The PCR test would have lumped them all  together. So does this invalidate all data gathered where PCR is the primary method used to detect Covid 19? 

 

https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dls/locs/2021/07-21-2021-lab-alert-Changes_CDC_RT-PCR_SARS-CoV-2_Testing_1.html?fbclid=IwAR2Hv-qYRFsiLyLj-uT22Z-30mqDcJIIaUJx2n0QGI6XjnpaSmCjaChjnaQ

 

 

https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19-emergency-use-authorizations-medical-devices/in-vitro-diagnostics-euas?ACSTrackingID=USCDC_2146-DM61940&ACSTrackingLabel=Lab Alert%3A Changes to CDC RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Testing&deliveryName=USCDC_2146-DM61940

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, ZonkoVille77 said:

The CDC is recommending NOT using the PCR test because its, eh, not, eh, valid for detecting Covid 19, because it also picks up Flu. This is exactly what 'conspiracy theorists' had said all along about the PCR test. Flu may not have 'disappeared' last winter at all. The PCR test would have lumped them all  together. So does this invalidate all data gathered where PCR is the primary method used to detect Covid 19? 

 

https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dls/locs/2021/07-21-2021-lab-alert-Changes_CDC_RT-PCR_SARS-CoV-2_Testing_1.html?fbclid=IwAR2Hv-qYRFsiLyLj-uT22Z-30mqDcJIIaUJx2n0QGI6XjnpaSmCjaChjnaQ

 

 

https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19-emergency-use-authorizations-medical-devices/in-vitro-diagnostics-euas?ACSTrackingID=USCDC_2146-DM61940&ACSTrackingLabel=Lab Alert%3A Changes to CDC RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Testing&deliveryName=USCDC_2146-DM61940

It may mean  that you have to take into consideration that a percentage of the registered covid cases were probably flu. I don't think that was a full on conspiracy theory, dissappearance of flu.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, SasaS said:

It may mean  that you have to take into consideration that a percentage of the registered covid cases were probably flu. I don't think that was a full on conspiracy theory, dissappearance of flu.

 

Depending on who you talk to, it was a full on conspiracy theory. Regardless it looks like case numbers are flawed if it was unable to distinguished between Flu and Covid, unless you can argue otherwise?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Skidfingers McGonical said:

How have you come to think it’s relevant to ask that question based on my question? 
 

It’s called an opposing view, nothing more. It’s not up to me to decide what should and should not be posted on here. Nor is it yours. 

If ignorant blerts are sharing far right conspiracy shite without mentioning who they actually are, I don't think it's a bad thing to point it out myself. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, cloggypop said:

If ignorant blerts are sharing far right conspiracy shite without mentioning who they actually are, I don't think it's a bad thing to point it out myself. 

 

Maybe he just didn't know it was a far-right cunt? Have you thought about that? Does benefit of doubt exist anymore or has that been shutdown too?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, ZonkoVille77 said:

 

Depending on who you talk to, it was a full on conspiracy theory. Regardless it looks like case numbers are flawed if it was unable to distinguished between Flu and Covid, unless you can argue otherwise?

Case numbers were always "flawed", because not only were PCR tests not full proof, the numbers were highly dependent on the extent of testing.

It depends on your definition of a conspiracy theory, for example, I've seen articles arguing that when analyzing Sweden's numbers people neglect the fact that they probably include flu deaths and that flu seasons must be factored in differently and so on, in great detail, arguing from the point of lockdown sceptisism, which is not exactly a conspiracy theory.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×