Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Coronavirus


Bjornebye

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

Is this the point where we call you a flash cunt for the way you "inadvertently" got your fancy-pants hayfever tablets in that shot?

Home & Bargain cheapos, them! 
 

I thought it would’ve been the Indian mango wood and ceramic storage drawers from Shared Earth on Bold Street (just next to the antihistamines) that would’ve gave off the fancy-pants vibes! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And so it begins..,

 

‘The UK government is trying to block disclosures to the inquiry investigating its handling of the Covid-19 pandemic, according to people with knowledge of the discussions.

 

Officials have asked the government’s top lawyer, Sir James Eadie QC, to assess how much information the administration has to provide to the inquiry about its policy discussions during the pandemic, the people said.

 

Following the advice, the government is considering issuing a restriction notice that would block the release of information that could fall under the remit of Cabinet collective responsibility.

 

This would mean ministers could argue that some internal documents detailing private discussions on key decisions such as lockdown restrictions should not be disclosed, because ministers have a right to confidentiality when deliberating on government policy.

 

In preparation for the inquiry, ministers have ordered officials to use a traffic light code to grade the political sensitivity of potential Cabinet-level disclosures, according to a person familiar with the work. The most controversial information has been marked red and ministers will seek a restriction notice to prevent its release, the people said.

 

Ministers are also considering invoking their so-called legal professional privilege, that would mean government ministers and employees could not be compelled to release some sensitive documents.

 

During a recent inquiry into people who contracted HIV and hepatitis from infected blood transfusions in the 1970s and 80s, the government waived that privilege to allow the fullest access to evidence.

 

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-07-13/uk-government-seeks-to-block-disclosures-to-the-covid-inquiry#xj4y7vzkg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Bruce Spanner said:

And so it begins..,

 

‘The UK government is trying to block disclosures to the inquiry investigating its handling of the Covid-19 pandemic, according to people with knowledge of the discussions.

 

Officials have asked the government’s top lawyer, Sir James Eadie QC, to assess how much information the administration has to provide to the inquiry about its policy discussions during the pandemic, the people said.

 

Following the advice, the government is considering issuing a restriction notice that would block the release of information that could fall under the remit of Cabinet collective responsibility.

 

This would mean ministers could argue that some internal documents detailing private discussions on key decisions such as lockdown restrictions should not be disclosed, because ministers have a right to confidentiality when deliberating on government policy.

 

In preparation for the inquiry, ministers have ordered officials to use a traffic light code to grade the political sensitivity of potential Cabinet-level disclosures, according to a person familiar with the work. The most controversial information has been marked red and ministers will seek a restriction notice to prevent its release, the people said.

 

Ministers are also considering invoking their so-called legal professional privilege, that would mean government ministers and employees could not be compelled to release some sensitive documents.

 

During a recent inquiry into people who contracted HIV and hepatitis from infected blood transfusions in the 1970s and 80s, the government waived that privilege to allow the fullest access to evidence.

 

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-07-13/uk-government-seeks-to-block-disclosures-to-the-covid-inquiry#xj4y7vzkg

Quelle fucking surprise 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Bruce Spanner said:

And so it begins..,

 

‘The UK government is trying to block disclosures to the inquiry investigating its handling of the Covid-19 pandemic, according to people with knowledge of the discussions.

 

Officials have asked the government’s top lawyer, Sir James Eadie QC, to assess how much information the administration has to provide to the inquiry about its policy discussions during the pandemic, the people said.

 

Following the advice, the government is considering issuing a restriction notice that would block the release of information that could fall under the remit of Cabinet collective responsibility.

 

This would mean ministers could argue that some internal documents detailing private discussions on key decisions such as lockdown restrictions should not be disclosed, because ministers have a right to confidentiality when deliberating on government policy.

 

In preparation for the inquiry, ministers have ordered officials to use a traffic light code to grade the political sensitivity of potential Cabinet-level disclosures, according to a person familiar with the work. The most controversial information has been marked red and ministers will seek a restriction notice to prevent its release, the people said.

 

Ministers are also considering invoking their so-called legal professional privilege, that would mean government ministers and employees could not be compelled to release some sensitive documents.

 

During a recent inquiry into people who contracted HIV and hepatitis from infected blood transfusions in the 1970s and 80s, the government waived that privilege to allow the fullest access to evidence.

 

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-07-13/uk-government-seeks-to-block-disclosures-to-the-covid-inquiry#xj4y7vzkg

 

Millions rely on these people to keep them safe and healthy. Makes you wonder. Absolute cunts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...