Quantcast
Jamie apologises to evra for Suarez t shirt protest. - Page 6 - FF - Football Forum - The Liverpool Way Jump to content
dockers_strike

Jamie apologises to evra for Suarez t shirt protest.

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, skaro said:

People weren't talking about it.  Haven't, pretty much, since it happened.  Except on here.

Doesn't matter. Apologizing is just the decent thing to do even if it wasn't prompted. Actually, especially if it wasn't prompted because it doesn't look forced.

 

And there's some form of closure now because it was always a bad look to the outside that the club or someone there had never expressed regret for how the situation unfolded.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Captain Turdseye said:

 

Weird man, you are. The epitome of the kind of knob that fans of other clubs mock us for having as supporters. Strange Scando bloke that pays hundreds for tickets and always talks about ‘bitters’ and ‘chelshit’ whilst trying too hard. If you’re on Twitter I bet you sign off on all your Tweets with a #YNWA at the end. 

Scando is a derogatory word for Scandinavian people. Spending alot of money following the club, you are absolutely right. Bitters yes, although most I've met are actually quite sound albeit they've been middleaged most of them. Chelshit not so much. Twitter is a no also. Try hard, yes. It's about the club and not some washed up ex-player playing sky commentator, who just shafted the club in so many ways. Souness was a real legend and he doesn't sit right with me either for that s*n shit.

 

I'd fucking eat oatmeal to get over more. But the wife and three kids wouldn't agree to that. If it makes me a bad supporter for wanting to kick Carragher into next week for shafting the club, then so be it. It doesn't make a god damn difference to me. The club first everything else is just transition bar those who gave it all for the club while playing and have acted with a decent behaviour after. Carragher just messed that up. If he is still a legend in your opinion then that's your prerogative. 

 

Oh and

YNWA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, Alex_K said:

You’re watching the Sky-shortened video, aren’t you? Well they got you hook, line and sinker - I guess that’s what it’s there for.

 

If you are interested in the full version rather than soundbites, Carragher launches the Suárez conversation completely unprompted at 3 min 25 second on the 10 min video below

 

>> 

 

Oh yes. They fooled me good, the way they put that link in your post!

 

I'm not sure why "they" (whoever they are) want me to think that Carra never brought Suarez up, but I'm glad you're here to sort it out. 

 

Do you think that a discussion of racism between Evra and one of Suarez's team-mates could have avoided the subject? That if Carra hadn't brought it up, it wouldn't have been mentioned?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, 3 Stacks said:

Doesn't matter. Apologizing is just the decent thing to do even if it wasn't prompted. Actually, especially if it wasn't prompted because it doesn't look forced.

 

And there's some form of closure now because it was always a bad look to the outside that the club or someone there had never expressed regret for how the situation unfolded.

 

Yes it does, if you think he was apologising for something that didn't need to be apologised for, and that people were no longer talking about.

 

It's re-opening rather than closure, I think.

 

And, in my opinion, I don't think Carragher gives a fuck what it looks or looked like for the club.

 

He looks like he's in it for himself nowadays, to me.

 

And fair fucks to him for that, I guess.

 

He ain't speaking for my club - as far as I'm concerned.

 

 

  • Upvote 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, lebron said:

Carragher is a xenophobe, his comments and actions towards Rafa and the other Spanish-speaking players at the time and later leaves little doubt about that. Him selling out now to stay on the Sky payroll is just a continuation of this. If it were up to Carra we would have Alan Curbishley, Hodgson or Eddie Howe managing us with a team of 11 British players.

To be honest I love it when little cunts like you out yourselves.  You support Rafa Benitez FC and not Liverpool so I don’t know why you still hover round on a Liverpool site.

 

He got fucked off years ago because he was taking the club backwards, whilst taking a fat contract from Hicks and Gillet and making a show of us.  The rumours that Gerrard and Carragher were part of it behind the scenes are my favourite bit.  The club wouldn’t be where it is without them.  He wouldn’t have last 12 months at the club either if it wasn’t for Carragher and Gerrard.  That fact rustles glory hunting gobshites like yourself and you can’t handle it.

  • Downvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, skaro said:

Yes it does, if you think he was apologising for something that didn't need to be apologised for.

It did need to be apologized for. Any unbiased, reasonable person would realize that. And I'm talking about the whole of the situation, not some of the minute things that people questioned happened.

  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, 3 Stacks said:

It did need to be apologized for. Any unbiased, reasonable person would realize that. And I'm talking about the whole of the situation, not some minute thing that happened that some people question happened or have contention with.

 

I disagree with your unbiased, reasonable contention. 

 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, skaro said:

 

People weren't talking about it.  Haven't, pretty much, since it happened.  Except on here.

 

Suarez's palpable, blatant and repeated biting, as well as his brilliant football, have and will always be much bigger talking points - for those who can continue to be arsed - than a contentious, questionable incident with a contentious, questionable opponent (read: twat) like Evra.

 

 

You missed Evans' article last week then?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, skaro said:

 

I disagree with your unbiased, reasonable contention. 

 

This is a hilarious response and all but if you or others are in favour of forever ignoring a contentious racial issue (again whether you think it was racist or not is irrelevant, loads of people do) and think there's a statute of limitations on an incident being discussed/apologized for, that's just really dumb. I'll just leave it at that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, 3 Stacks said:

This is a hilarious response and all but if you or others are in favour of forever ignoring a contentious racial issue and think there's a statute of limitations on an incident being discussed/apologized for, that's just really dumb.

 

I'm not ignoring a contentious racial issue.

On the contrary, I'm actually saying it was a very, very, very contentious racial issue and its "conclusions" remain so.

And so I'm happy to move on from it.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, skaro said:

 

Yep, I missed an article.  

Fair enough, it went kind of viral and was utterly myopic (throwing LFC and it's fans under the bus and suggesting blame for the rise in racial incidents, it was nonsense, but lauded as a great reflection on the events).  It definitely riled the issue back up and I think the Sky producers were clearly capitalising on that.  Point is, it hasn't just sprung from nowhere.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, skaro said:

 

I'm not ignoring a contentious racial issue.

On the contrary, I'm actually saying it was a very, very, very contentious racial issue and its "conclusions" remain so.

And so I'm happy to move on from it.

 

 

You literally said it was a "re-opening" meaning you think it shouldn't have been discussed, so basically ignored. Can you not remember what you typed even 20 minutes ago? Jesus.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Pidge said:

Fair enough, it went kind of viral and was utterly myopic.  It definitely riled the issue back up and  

I think the Sky producers were clearly capitalising on that. 

Point is, it hasn't just sprung from nowhere.

 

And, my hunch is, Carragher was just playing along with this - rather than being sincere.

 

And I could of course be wrong.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, The Guest said:

To be honest I love it when little cunts like you out yourselves.  You support Rafa Benitez FC and not Liverpool so I don’t know why you still hover round on a Liverpool site.

 

He got fucked off years ago because he was taking the club backwards, whilst taking a fat contract from Hicks and Gillet and making a show of us.  The rumours that Gerrard and Carragher were part of it behind the scenes are my favourite bit.  The club wouldn’t be where it is without them.  He wouldn’t have last 12 months at the club either if it wasn’t for Carragher and Gerrard.  That fact rustles glory hunting gobshites like yourself and you can’t handle it.

Decent first paragraph but the second makes you come across as big a tit as Lebron, in my opinion. Carragher, Gerrard and Benitez are all Liverpool legends. I couldn’t give a fuck about what did or didn’t go on behind the scenes and whether or not they got on. They all played an integral role in us winning number five.

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, 3 Stacks said:

You literally said it was a "re-opening" meaning you think it shouldn't have been discussed, so basically ignored. Can you not remember what you typed even 20 minutes ago? Jesus.

 

No, you're doing all the surmising and pretexting here, Jesus.

 

But I'm happy for you to be right in all this - after all, it's only opinions.

 

It is 12.55am here in Australia - so I concede defeat.

 

You're right, Jamie should have apologised.  


It will make all the difference, and provide us all with closure on this matter - one that should be discussed.

 

Goodnight.

 

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, AngryofTuebrook said:

Oh yes. They fooled me good, the way they put that link in your post!

 

I'm not sure why "they" (whoever they are) want me to think that Carra never brought Suarez up, but I'm glad you're here to sort it out. 

 

Do you think that a discussion of racism between Evra and one of Suarez's team-mates could have avoided the subject? That if Carra hadn't brought it up, it wouldn't have been mentioned?

The link I cited was in the post - you simply aren’t intelligent enough to process the information. So much so that you posted multiple times, even though you could have just stopped the first time you were shown to be an idiot, and separately continued to shop the line that Carragher had no choice but to engage in the conversation. But idiots are as idiots do. One last time, so it really sinks in — Jamie Carragher initiated the conversation on Suarez. Jamie Carragher did not respond to the conversation on Suarez.

 

I think it was a pre-orchestrated conversation where Carragher pimped his career-association with Liverpool FC to get a few bites of quick, good publicity given his stock fell significantly with the general public when he was removed from TV for spitting in the aim of continuing his Sky TV rehabilitation. That’s my thought, simply put. No need for me to post again on the matter - it’s boring now.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, lebron said:

Carragher is a xenophobe, his comments and actions towards Rafa and the other Spanish-speaking players at the time and later leaves little doubt about that. Him selling out now to stay on the Sky payroll is just a continuation of this. If it were up to Carra we would have Alan Curbishley, Hodgson or Eddie Howe managing us with a team of 11 British players.

 

Remember his comments about how his brothers couldn't get jobs because of all the foreigners?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, The Guest said:

He wouldn’t have last 12 months at the club either if it wasn’t for Carragher and Gerrard.

Oh behave, without Rafa they wouldn’t have been CL winners.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear World,

 

On behalf of all of us at TLW, I would like to offer my most sincere apologies for the apology Jamie 'Carra' Carragher made on Sky Television regarding the Luis Suarez T-Shirt support campaign. Whilst we admit the optics of the campaign might be regrettable, we maintain our long standing opinion that Evra is a complete shithouse liar. For that, we make no apology, you bunch of snivelling, fat, stupid, fat, snivelling pricks. 

 

TLW

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

Carra loves Brexit

Gnasher loves Brext

Therefore...

Gnasher is Carra. 

 

Impeccable logic, I'm sure you'll agree.

Gnasher is Hades 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Available Subscriptions

  • Last Match Report

  • Latest Posts

    • Pure 80s that hat although no self respecting human would have left the bobble on
    • The lads goalie kit arrived today    Shirt with A.Becker and No.1 on back, shorts with No.1 on and socks.   Absolutely spot on.   £15 .... took just over 2 weeks to come.
    • Some of Catchers recent musings, this cunt should be in an asylum, the mad cunt     catcherintherye said: This response I'm afraid is typically vapid and illogical. Your club and fans have a serious problem, and ridiculous ill thought through replies aren't going to solve the problem.

      You are a rotten racist club, to the very core. Go and read the culture that presided over the club in the 80's in Howard Gayle's book. The ridiculous nicknames for John Barnes. The KKK inspired parties for Gayle to have to attend. Then fast forward. The abuse of a black teenager who had to leave the pitch in tears due to monkey chants. The abuse of Evra (and lack of any apology, and mindless inane chants of calling him a "lying ******) from the crowd. The deliberate and provocotive championing of a racist, shortly after they were convicted of racism, and instead of wearing Kick it out T Shirts in an unprecendented move making him the emblem of the club.

      Think of the abuse and continued lies towards Mason Holgate for daring to bring an accusation of racism, and the inane racism that comes out of 99% of your suporters mouths when the laws and principles that Lawrence family fought so hard for are parodied and insulted by more white LFC supporters (and racists). Who on earth do fans of your club think they are, to make judgement on what the Lawrences have achieved? What on earth have your club and it's fans ever achieved that thinks they are in any kind of position to ever make a moral judgement on them and what they fought for?

      Then think of the gawping face of your owner, smiling and gafforing with the worlds leadign fascist Donald Trump and even giving him a signed Red Sox shirt. In just the same way apoligists did to Adolf Hitler all those years ago to help normalise a disgraceful regime.

      Think of the "no Fenians" graffiti, the secterian loyalist songs belted out from the Kop, the lack of any Irish Catholic players signed until the 1980's, the board that was set uplmost entirely of Orangemen and Tories with the intent of being a club made up of, and welcoem to only 1 section of the community. Think of how it was formed by the backs of wealthy tory landowners and the scabs of society who lacked the courage and basic sense of decency to do what is right, and run these people out of town.

      Think of the crowing around Thatcher, as she destroyed the city, pitching up for picture ops at every opportunity while the poeple in the city suffered. The arson attacks on cultural heritage sites. The urinating and graffiting of murals for Evertonians who've died then the fake news Evertonians do the same. That you have fan after fan oncomments pages defending the right of Rees Mogg and his scummy entitled kids to support Liverpool. The man who is now enabling a government to again decimate the life chances of people in the city whileyour fans defend him as one of their own.

      So I tell you what, why don't you get angry about just a single 1 of the multitude of unforgiveable examples I've given, and apologise for supporting such a racist, elitist and prejudicial organisation rather than trying to have a pop at someone who has taken the time to analyse the actions in an impartial and reasnable manner. There is no justification for what you and your sort do. You're an utter disgrace and a cancer on society.       Can you imagine running out to a song used by that tory, flag waving racist nonsense? If they did it with Z-cars I'd refuse them to use it, and if they did demand we changed. No way would I want to be associated with the sort of scum who attend night of the proms.

      You know that their core demographic (home county thatcherites) will be all over that, hence why it's been selected. It will fit in with the no blacks, no irish policy they ran for most of their existence.
          catcherintherye Player Valuation: £70m Forum Supporter August 25, 2020   Add bookmark #21,933 They've taken a black, middle eastern, Jewish anti-imperialist provacator and painted him as a white German. Essentially as they have no achievements in their own lives, they have to steal achievements of black people from the middle east.

          catcherintherye Player Valuation: £70m Forum Supporter August 25, 2020   Add bookmark #21,935 Is this LFC or night at the Proms? 

      On the 2nd point, this is the classic social bse of fascism isn't it? The lumpen proliteriat (blokes who urinate on memorials to those who have died) and the more squeezed middle sections (those cheer them on, and deflect from it). It's the same model.

      Everton has a proliterian core to it's fanbase. As Labone said 1=20. It's funny Trotsky actually said the same about proliterians compared to the base of fascism (said we were worth 20 of them).

      Once they start waving union jacks to YNWA though, they really ought to reflect who and what they are, which is very much English not scouse. They are invader in our lands, with a small handful of uncle tom scabs to cheer them on.    
      There's obviously different theories of what fascism is and how to identify it. I am most sympathetic to the one outlined their, which is essentially it developed an independent pole of attraction tht had a paradoxical position of doing aspects of what the elite wanted, but also existing as a threat in other areas. The social bae of the Nazi's (and indeed Mussolini's Fasci) were lumpen thugs and aspects of the middle class, at the lower end who felt "squeezed" above and below.

      LFC have a very similar dynamic in their support base. Lots of home counties types with range rover and a subscription to the Telegraph and the lumpen fools who try to torch iconic symbolsof a working class city, or urinate on memorials/graffiti them. Go and watch Tommy Robinsons visits to Liverpool, the crowds that go to watch him are full of LFC shirts. They're a racist club, with racist support (he himself went to Anfield, and no harm came to him, I suspect he was welcomed).

      As for the 2nd part, them and United are the establishment clubs. They're as establishment as Saville and Thatcher. Loads of tories support them, including now Rees Mogg. They are as English/British as the Union Jack. They are trying to colonise a working class city with their nonsense as well. They'll lap it up being on the Proms as well. There will be absolutely no calls for the club to distance itself from the establishment once YNWA becomes the new song of british imperialism at the Proms. Most of them will be dead chuffed they can asscoiate themselves to the mass murder of the British empire, as they hate Black people and Irish people.                                                                                    
    • https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/cant-enough-celtic-andy-robertson-13147115      
  • Latest Round Up

  • Popular Now

  • Popular Contributors

  • Football Betting Site Betway
  • top casino sites
  • new UK casino
×