Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Harvey Elliott


suzy
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Colonel Bumcunt said:

How very normal for the press to have a go at a 16 year old boy for being a 16 year old boy.

 

I hate the media.  I'm making a point of twatting anyone I meet who tells me they're a journalist.  They're as bad as sex offenders, just grotesque aberrations in the human race. 

 

I was unsure whether to rep or neg this as that is a ridiculous post, but you have a great username. So I repped you for username. I'm a fickle cunt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, SlugTrail said:

I was unsure whether to rep or neg this as that is a ridiculous post, but you have a great username. So I repped you for username. I'm a fickle cunt.

Why is it ridiculous?

 

Modern journalists are scum.  They know what they're signing up to do, they know how the industry works, they know that clicks and sales are held above facts and fairness.  They know what they're doing, and they know how to do their jobs the right way, and they choose to not do that, they choose to be complicit, and they take us for idiots, and they exploit people like Harry Kane. 

 

It's ironic, the 'mong' thing, because journalists forge careers out of wilfully misleading and riling 'mongs' each day.  You can say what you like about Elliott, a 16 year old who used a gross term, one we don't like to hear these days, but it pales into comparison against 40 year old men writing articles and headlines that take advantage of the trust of people, even vulnerable people, in order to do the bidding of their masters.  

 

Nah, fuck off.  It's not the Goebbels defence of "I was just doing my job for Germany".  This is grown people making a choice to deceive the British people, while getting paid by offshore companies and non-British nationals with horrible aspirations. 

 

Ah shit, this is a thread about Harvey Elliott, isn't it. Look at the state of me. 

  • Upvote 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Colonel Bumcunt said:

Why is it ridiculous?

 

Modern journalists are scum.  They know what they're signing up to do, they know how the industry works, they know that clicks and sales are held above facts and fairness.  They know what they're doing, and they know how to do their jobs the right way, and they choose to not do that, they choose to be complicit, and they take us for idiots, and they exploit people like Harry Kane. 

 

It's ironic, the 'mong' thing, because journalists forge careers out of wilfully misleading and riling 'mongs' each day.  You can say what you like about Elliott, a 16 year old who used a gross term, one we don't like to hear these days, but it pales into comparison against 40 year old men writing articles and headlines that take advantage of the trust of people, even vulnerable people, in order to do the bidding of their masters.  

 

Nah, fuck off.  It's not the Goebbels defence of "I was just doing my job for Germany".  This is grown people making a choice to deceive the British people, while getting paid by offshore companies and non-British nationals with horrible aspirations. 

 

Ah shit, this is a thread about Harvey Elliott, isn't it. Look at the state of me. 

Repped for intense hatred of the press 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Colonel Bumcunt said:

Why is it ridiculous?

 

Modern journalists are scum.  They know what they're signing up to do, they know how the industry works, they know that clicks and sales are held above facts and fairness.  They know what they're doing, and they know how to do their jobs the right way, and they choose to not do that, they choose to be complicit, and they take us for idiots, and they exploit people like Harry Kane. 

 

It's ironic, the 'mong' thing, because journalists forge careers out of wilfully misleading and riling 'mongs' each day.  You can say what you like about Elliott, a 16 year old who used a gross term, one we don't like to hear these days, but it pales into comparison against 40 year old men writing articles and headlines that take advantage of the trust of people, even vulnerable people, in order to do the bidding of their masters.  

 

Nah, fuck off.  It's not the Goebbels defence of "I was just doing my job for Germany".  This is grown people making a choice to deceive the British people, while getting paid by offshore companies and non-British nationals with horrible aspirations. 

 

Ah shit, this is a thread about Harvey Elliott, isn't it. Look at the state of me. 

Because you are tarring them all with the same brush. It's like the bloos calling all liverpool fans Murderers because of what a few people did.

 

I'm not saying I like Journalists but your hatred of them is a bit OTT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...