Quantcast
Women's World Cup - FF - Football Forum - The Liverpool Way Jump to content
The Woolster

Women's World Cup

Recommended Posts

Starts tonight.

 

I know I know, most of you don't give a shit and think the quality is rubbish!

 

My daughter plays though, and she is not too bad, so I'll be tuning in as I think it will be good for her to have some female role models as well. And, England actually have a decent team to cheer on! There's at least a couple of scousers in the team too.

 

Anyone else watching, or will it be just me?

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ll be hoping the Lionesses win it. Amazingly the men’s team have a bigger bunch of cunts than the women’s 

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Bjornebye said:

I’ll be hoping the Lionesses win it.

 

Seconded. Anything that moves Gary Neville closer to Southgate’s job....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't mind watching women's football, you just have to accept it's developing around different abilities, like youth football. First match I properly paid attention to was the World Cup final between Japan and USA; it was decent, due to the contrasting styles.

 

Anything that expands football and has a chance of puncturing the monopoly of the old fucks brigade who run it has my support. My only issue is making them use the same size goals, as even Karius sniggers at the standard of goalkeeping.

 

Oh, and Alex Scott is better than most male pundits.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Was involved at a pretty reasonable level coaching in the women's game and there is a fair amount of talent there (calm down!) but there is still a large disparity between teams and even players in the same team. Can be entertaining at the highest levels but will be a few walkovers I imagine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, VladimirIlyich said:

Was involved at a pretty reasonable level coaching in the women's game and there is a fair amount of talent there (calm down!) but there is still a large disparity between teams and even players in the same team. Can be entertaining at the highest levels but will be a few legovers I imagine.

ooo'er 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Babb'sBurstNad said:

I don't mind watching women's football, you just have to accept it's developing around different abilities, like youth football. First match I properly paid attention to was the World Cup final between Japan and USA; it was decent, due to the contrasting styles.

 

Anything that expands football and has a chance of puncturing the monopoly of the old fucks brigade who run it has my support. My only issue is making them use the same size goals, as even Karius sniggers at the standard of goalkeeping.

 

Oh, and Alex Scott is better than most male pundits.

 

Exactly, I watch plenty of our U23s and U18s, and sometimes it is rubbish!

 

Not sure I agree on the goals, bigger goals means more goals, and unless they are all going in at one end, it should mean more exciting games which can help its development.

 

I think the keeper issues should improve as the playing pool gets bigger. For a while it was possibly a case of if wanted to play in goal, you was good enough to play in goal!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah couple of players from Liverpool aren't there? There's an advert up at the junction of Park Road/Aigburth Road for Nikita Parris who is from Toxteth and who's family lives there. 

 

I'll watch some of it - my daughter has developed an interest in footy so as mentioned above it'll be good for her to see women playing footy i think. I'll support them, unlike the men's team who i actively despise. 

 

Ironically i was talking about it in the office to the women in my team and they were at best clueless about it, and at worst positively didn't give a shit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Bobby Hundreds said:

General play is decent but like mentioned the goal keepers are worse than toddlers.

 

The size of the goals is one issue, but a bigger one is that all the goalkeepers play like their legs have been set in concrete such is their inability to get off the ground when the ball is all head height.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I enjoyed the last one. At the risk of damning with faint praise, sometimes you just want to sit back and watch some free-to-air football and not work yourself into a frenzy over some bullshit. The Women's World Cup fits the bill. 

  • Upvote 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Will watch bits of it if England progresses.

 

Football ( playing and supporting ) has been one of the greatest influences on my life , and can't see why 50% of the population should not be given the same opportunities I had.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, sir roger said:

Will watch bits of it if England progresses.

 

Football ( playing and supporting ) has been one of the greatest influences on my life , and can't see why 50% of the population should not be given the same opportunities I had.

 

You're now on Jacob Rees Mogg's hitlist. 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've noticed over the past few months that The Telegraph have been putting a lot more resources into reporting on women's football, so this might be the best place for written coverage

 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-cup/

 

And I did not know that Steph Houghton was married to Stephen Darby!

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That Rachel Yankey was in the year below me at secondary school. I didn't realise she was a girl until about the 3rd or 4th year as she had short back and sides and everyone called her "Ray", but found out that was so she could play for a boys footy team.

 

Thankfully things have changed since then, girls can now play in mixed teams until 18!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What I don't like about women's football is how they made it into a gender equality issue over the past few years, with pay demands and media coverage witch does not match the actual interest.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've only really seen the US women's team doing that, and to be fair, the US women's team earned more money (or profit, can't remember) than the US Men's team for their federation due to their relative success compared to the men. At least they did after they won the last world cup 4 years ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, The Woolster said:

That Rachel Yankey was in the year below me at secondary school. I didn't realise she was a girl until about the 3rd or 4th year as she had short back and sides and everyone called her "Ray", but found out that was so she could play for a boys footy team.

 

Thankfully things have changed since then, girls can now play in mixed teams until 18!

Sue Smith was a few years above me in senior school 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Available Subscriptions

  • Last Match Report

  • Latest Posts

    • I think they do. In the 90s and a bit later we would spend nearly as much as united in transfer fees but we would buy 4 or 5 average players like we were trying to build a team every window or at least thats how it felt thinking back. United just saw a weak spot in the team or a player moved on and they went an bought what they believed to be the best replacement for big money. Once you've built the top side its harder to improve but when that top player comes along who would improve you,  you buy him. We have loads of quiet transfer windows for me that should mean for examples sake if say Halaand is on the market we should be able to buy him without all the fans turning into bean counters and complete panic about the financial repercussions. We are Liverpool 19 times league champions, 6 times European cup winners we should be able to act like a Billy big bollocks in the market now and then because we don't go big or even medium most windows, the books dont need to be balanced at the end of every window, we can carry debt or profit into the next ones depending on the teams needs.   In my opinion we need a midfielder and possibly a forward if that means this window we spend more than we've earnt so be it, the next summer window we will undoubtedly sell one of our forwards and a few of our midfielders, the most important thing is the time in-between the windows the team needs to be competing for titles, our weaknesses need to be addressed so we can remain on top, everyone has different opinions on our weaknesses mine is way too many injury prone midfielders with the likes of Kieta and Ox who when given chances the rare times they ate fit don't take them.   FSG said the redbird investment meant we are were we should be if there was no pandemic it reset the losses, now the deal is out of mind we hear of the devastating effect of corona.    I'm not even arsed, the window is still open, if it ends and we've just signed konate and some kids I'd say they haven't done enough this window but I'll get over it as said a million times Klopp is our superstar and FSGs golden Goose.
    • For the Palace game i think we only had about 10k capacity. my Dad didn't have a smartphone so was told to pick up a paper ticket from the ticket office. We were told what time to go in the ground with the NFC passes and i think the window was between 1 hour and 15 mins before KO so that suited me. we went to the office to pick up his ticket and there was a massive spiraling queue accumulating outside for people whose NFC passes weren't working-scanning issues and downloading. The queue wasn't moving particular fast so a few must have missed KO. The pre season friendlies should help them get their act together but i wouldn't take any risks on getting to the ground late for the first few league games next season. Somewhere like the kemlyn is full of old men so i'd give yourself even more time if sitting there
    • I think what we see with FSG is something that is particular to FSG rather than being a widespread feature of modern football. They are what Tom Wolfe labelled 'Masters of the Universe', thinking that everything they do is brilliance and they don't consult the little people on anything. Other owners are happy to bob along hoping something will turn up rather than actively changing things. FSG, on the other hand, are not ones for leaving well enough alone. The ESL is the classic example of this. They think the financial basis of football is nuts and something must be done about it. The ESL is something, therefore we have to do it. In fairness, you can add expanding Anfield and hiring Jurgen Klopp to your list. And before anyone says they were no-brainers, staying at Anfield was not the consensus choice among the fanbase, many of whom were seduced by the shiny new thing - gee, where can we see that at play now? - and Klopp could have had his choice of clubs, yet it was FSG who landed him.
    • Lee Clark is OK by me. When I was still in high school he lived near some mates of mine and always used to come out and play football with us if he saw us playing. 
    • Also FSG isn’t a hedge fund. Henry made his money through having a hedge fund, FSG is a sports investment vehicle. They aim to make money from sport.
  • Latest Round Up

    45
  • Popular Contributors

  • top casino sites
  • new UK casino
×