Premier League Round Up (Mar 9-10 2019) - FF - Football Forum - The Liverpool Way Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
tlw content

Premier League Round Up (Mar 9-10 2019)

Recommended Posts

Everton continue to be the gift that keeps on giving. 2-0 up at half time at Newcastle, they somehow managed to fuck it up and lose. In fairness to the Blues we’ve seen this happen to loads of mid-table teams who play in a cup final and then can’t lift yourself for run of the mill games that follow. 


They achieved their goal for the season last week by knocking us off the top of the table, so a hangover was inevitable. They might not win another game all season. Lucky for them they had a decent start and have a seven point cushion from the bottom three. 


They started well enough against Newcastle though, and Calvert-Lewin headed them in front. Pickford then conceded a pen when he flapped at a cross and then rugby tackled Rondon. Probably should have been a red card too, although there was a defender on the line and refs are always looking for an excuse to not send the offender off in these situations (like Harry Maguire at Anfield). 


Pickford then saved Matt Ritchie’s pen, much to the fury of the Geordies who hate him anyway because he’s from Sunderland. 71 seconds later it was 2-0 as Richarlison tapped in from a couple of yards out.


Pickford then denied that Ayoze Perez loser, which prompted the MOTD commentator to say “Pickford is going to have one of those games isn’t he? He’s going to keep everything out.” Hahaha! Classic commentators curse.


Pickford was acting the twat all afternoon though (should have seen him strutting off at half time like Connor McGregor, the knob) so what happened in that second half was extra funny. I mean it would have been hilarious anyway, but Pickford’s antics just added to the whole hilarity of it all.


First he came charging out of his goal and got lobbed by Rondon. He had to go chasing back and wouldn’t have gotten there had it been on target, but the ball drifted just wide of the post and Pickford was grinning and pulling tongues at the fans in the Gallowgate End. If you’re going to be that cocky you have to back it up, and he didn’t.


He wasn’t grinning a few minutes later when Perez and Rondon combined brilliantly for the big man to score with a volley that went smack bang in the middle of the goal. England’s Number One eh? 


He was even worse for the Newcastle equaliser. Their new signing, the worm with eyebrows, hit a stinging drive that Pickford made a right dog’s dinner of, palming it down perfectly for Perez to fire home. I’ve always liked that Ayoze lad, good player, very under-rated, and certainly not a loser. 


It got even better with six minutes remaining when an up and under found Rondon, who was one of FIVE Newcastle players clearly offside, and although Rondon’s touch was a little heavy, my boy Ayoze was on hand to smash it in for the winner.


No idea how the linesman failed to see the offside there though. It could just have been that there were so many of them offside that it obscured his view of Rondon. Perez was offside from the initial ball in, but not when he latched onto Rondon’s touch. Things were so much simpler under the old rule, but never mind, eh?


I actually think there’s something wrong with Pickford you know. Initially I suspected he might have Tourette’s but it’s not that. He might just be a bit thick, but I’m not sure it’s that either. I reckon he’s on the spectrum of something, as there’s something just a bit off about him. 



This is just a teaser, click here to view the full article


Please note that PL Round Ups are only available to website subscribers. Subscriptions cost just £2 a month (you need to register first) and can be purchased here. 

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheatarito. Ha, love it!

Each week's MotD is just a procession of refereeing howlers. Increasingly these days, I'm questioning the competence of these people less and less and their integrity/honesty more and more. I'm pissed off that there's not been more of a fuss about Tierney, and of course, he's not required to explain his decision. Would have been interesting to see f he'd been dropped this weekend - as was the linesman who allowed our goal at West Ham - but there's not a full set of PL matches because of the cup.

And then there's Kevin Friend. How the fuck does he not send Sissoko off? And how does he not give a penalty when Vertonghen boots that guy in the head in the penalty area when he was hacking it clear?! 

I also question Marriner's integrity on that first Burnley goal, as replays confirm he had an absolutley perfect view of it, no excuse of having a crowd of players to squint through.


Craig Pawson at the weekend - need to make sure we don't leave ourselves at the mercy of any of his weird and wonderful decisions.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Vardy did get goal number 100 when he raced onto a Maddison through ball and finished in typical Vardy style. Goal number 101 came soon after. Brendan was all over him on the pitch afterwards, the creepy bastard."


So true. He had his fat little hands all over Vardy's face. Facial hand rape, I'd call it...

  • Upvote 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brighton and Palace met at Selhurst Park in a game that for some reason is the biggest grudge match either side has. These teams hate each other. Not sure why, something about Gus Poyet having a shit on a dressing room floor or something.


It's a Seagulls - Eagles thing and it dates back to late 70s early 80s - so go figure!

  • Upvote 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great round up, Dave.

It is getting worrying that referees don't have to explain their decisions, when they are constantly gainsaid by ex-refs in the press after the games.  Tierney, Mariner & Friend should all have to explain why they "gave what they saw"

No wonder Baldiola will be worried about playing an English team in the CL with a truly neutral referee.


  • Upvote 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Available Subscriptions

  • Last Match Report

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah.   Klopp made a good point in his post match presser. He asked the room if anybody thought it was a penalty and 1 or 2 said they did (probably local Naples reporters). But the fact a couple did means it wasn’t a clear & obvious error.    However, it certainly wasn’t a clear cut penalty either. Personally, I think if it was referred he’d have overturned it as he didn’t stand for any of their shit all night - and IMO it should have been referred.   I’ve said before I like VAR, or at least the idea of it, but the implementation isn’t as expected & it’s gotten worse since the World Cup 18 months ago (although not perfect, it was actually decent in Russia IMO).    Anyway, I’m over it. Treat it as a minor inconvenience / annoyance and back us to win the next 4.
    • Virgil Van Dijk has played down the impact of Liverpool’s 2-0 defeat at the hands of Napoli in their Champions League clash on Tuesday evening.

      The Reds were looking good for a well earned point against the Italian side before a debatable penalty and a late strike in injury time by Fernando Llorente was enough to see the home side claim the three points.

      But Van Dijk said the defeat which was only their second in a competitive fixture this campaign, was not a cause for worry.

      The Liverpool Echo reported the defender as saying:

      “It didn’t feel like a wake-up call, I think both sides were focused fully on the game, It felt like it was going to be a draw, and then the penalty changed everything in the game. 

      “It shouldn’t be a wake-up call - we have been performing since the start of the season outstanding, and so there is no reason to panic.

      “And in the game as well, we played well, we put them under pressure, we created opportunities on the break. 

      “So there were a lot of positive things , the only thing not positive was the result.”  

      Van Dijk believed the final score was not a true reflection of the overall contest and the performance was full of merit.

      He also believed the penalty awarded against Andy Robertson completely changed the outcome of the game.

      “I think 2-0 didn’t really reflect the game.

      “I think we were much better (than last season) we lost it (again), but we played well, we had opportunities on the break, we played in some moments.

      “We felt comfortable, then they got the penalty which changed the game.”

      “Lots of times you can say that it felt a little bit harsh, but the ref made the decision so you have to accept it.

      “Everyone knows how tough it is to come here and beat them, first of all, but also to play well against them. 

      “But you could see we put them under a lot of pressure to try and win the ball quite a lot high up the pitch, and try to break on them.”

      The Reds will look to return to winning ways when they play Chelsea at Stanford Bridge on Sunday afternoon.
      View full article
    • Excellent report as per usual Dave,I agree with you on the VAR.... but what if as was suggested (by someone!)that captains are given 3 chances to question the decision (tennis & cricket)... works fine there & doesn't take long & everyone knows what the fuck is happening at least! 
    • He was decent here, but we replaced him with a better player in Fabinho. 
    • Once Everton touches you, you're better off asking a friend to make it quick.
  • Latest Round Up

  • Popular Contributors