Quantcast
Summer 2019 Transfer Thread - Page 291 - FF - Football Forum - The Liverpool Way Jump to content
Anubis

Summer 2019 Transfer Thread

Recommended Posts

Inter not content with buying one useless fat shit striker off United this summer? Where are they getting this money from to chuck down the pisser? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, TheHowieLama said:

Yea, that reads a little like Klopp trying to deflect from not buying anyone.

 

Cancelo is the most expensive RB in the world - pretty sure Guardiola did not mention anything about Walker needing to get injured.

Don't think he'd need to with the wage & extras they can offer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see it's been announced the loan fee for coutinho was only €8.3m, with them paying all his wages and an option to buy at €120m. Can't believe we weren't in at that price. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Barry Wom said:

I see it's been announced the loan fee for coutinho was only €8.3m, with them paying all his wages and an option to buy at €120m. Can't believe we weren't in at that price. 

I dont think we were offered that deal

 

The deal supposedly to us would have cost us 25mil for one season.

 

Wooly did a good breakdown of what each player costs us in true terms and that would have been about 20% higher for the year than we are into Van Dijk for.

 

And that had no purchase option - even if it did we aren't going to pay 110 mil sterling for anyone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, TheHowieLama said:

I dont think we were offered that deal

 

The deal supposedly to us would have cost us 25mil for one season.

 

Wooly did a good breakdown of what each player costs us in true terms and that would have been about 20% higher for the year than we are into Van Dijk for.

 

And that had no purchase option - even if it did we aren't going to pay 110 mil sterling for anyone.

I'm sure that offer would have been available to us had we tried, ultimately it's a price Barca were prepared to acceot. Maybe the 25m was wages too? I was told some time ago (maybe a month or 6 weeks ago) by the same fella who told me last autumn we on a wage reduction summer, that we were initially offered coutinho for 30m euros for 2 seasons. That was Barca's starting point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Barry Wom said:

I'm sure that offer would have been available to us had we tried, ultimately it's a price Barca were prepared to acceot. Maybe the 25m was wages too? I was told some time ago (maybe a month or 6 weeks ago) by the same fella who told me last autumn we on a wage reduction summer, that we were initially offered coutinho for 30m euros for 2 seasons. That was Barca's starting point.

Yea, the fee was 25mil pounds for one season, loan and wages. Ridiculous for a player that would probably be an option from the bench more often than not.

 

Disagree though -- they were hoping to get a couple of clubs interested and certainly thought an English club would come in. Once the window closed there options became very limited and it was a fire sale as there was no way back for him or them at that point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just on Coutinho, was there ever a precedent at Dortmund of Klopp taking a prodigal son back? I think he was gone with Gotze came back in.

 

Leaving money aside, for a man big on team values, I could see why Klopp might have been reluctant to have anything to do with him again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, El Rojo said:

Just on Coutinho, was there ever a precedent at Dortmund of Klopp taking a prodigal son back? I think he was gone with Gotze came back in.

 

Leaving money aside, for a man big on team values, I could see why Klopp might have been reluctant to have anything to do with him again.

Especially if it was a one off, season loan - difficult to be part of that group dynamic under those circumstances. And can't really leave the money part out -- would be exceedingly difficult to have the most expensive player on the team a rental.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, TheHowieLama said:

Yea, the fee was 25mil pounds for one season, loan and wages. Ridiculous for a player that would probably be an option from the bench more often than not.

 

Disagree though -- they were hoping to get a couple of clubs interested and certainly thought an English club would come in. Once the window closed there options became very limited and it was a fire sale as there was no way back for him or them at that point.

I'm sure the fire sale could have happened on 8th August. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, El Rojo said:

Just on Coutinho, was there ever a precedent at Dortmund of Klopp taking a prodigal son back? I think he was gone with Gotze came back in.

 

Leaving money aside, for a man big on team values, I could see why Klopp might have been reluctant to have anything to do with him again.

He took kagawa back and the lad who went to us for a bit, sahin. And I think he wanted to bring gotze to Liverpool didn't he and we got mane instead because gotze wouldn't join without CL football? 

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Barry Wom said:

He took kagawa back and the lad who went to us for a bit, sahin. And I think he wanted to bring gotze to Liverpool didn't he and we got mane instead because gotze wouldn't join without CL football? 

They were all his played though. Coutinho wasn't. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Coutinho has a 120m buy option which no one will exercise because it's a ridiculous amount. In essence, it's a straight up loan which Klopp would never have gone for because it's not a coherent long term decision.

 

Even if people want to do the "we're broke" argument, we still wouldn't have done it even if it had made financial sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, BeefStroganoff said:

Seems like we couldn't afford to loan Coutinho. Skint?

 

Oh yeah, because we didn't go for Coutinho, we must be in a worse financial state than Bolton or Bury.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Klopp's own words are "as weird as it sounds, we could not afford him"

 

The reason he adds 'as weird as it sounds' is because he fucking knows it sounds absolutely ludicrous to suggest we couldn't afford him or another major signing. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Available Subscriptions

  • Last Match Report

  • Latest Posts

    • Bit we've got Adam Lallana who is back from injury and like a new signing.
    • I don't know what to think about that. It's funny we're even arsed about doing it and we could ... but ffs, what the fuck are they playing at doing that and secondly getting caught? 
    • Jurgen Klopp has downplayed any suggestion that Liverpool struggle to defeat their top six rivals away from home.

      In the first two months of Jurgen Klopp’s tenure, the Reds had recorded two fine victories away to Chelsea (3-1) and Man City(4-1).

      But in recent times, it has become more of a struggle.

      The Reds have picked up just the one victory from the last away 12 fixtures, which was a 2-1 victory away to Tottenham last September.

      It is a stat which caused some surprise for Klopp, but he says the pleasing thing was that the performances were to the level he liked.

      The Mirror reported Klopp as saying:

      “Performance-wise, that’s why it’s so surprising.

      "There was one at Arsenal where we should have won when Virgil [van Dijk] had two no-brainers that he didn’t score, the header against the post.

      “Against Man City we lost last year but that is not a match you lose usually.

      “The margins at the end were so small with the ball not over the line."  

         Klopp alluded to the fact that some of those fixtures were played when his team was at a significant disadvantage compared to the opposition.

      “We were always the [Premier League] club that was in the Champions League the longest.

      “We lost 1-0 at Chelsea two seasons ago when we came from a Champions League game and they were not involved anymore. That helps.

      “I don’t remember these specific away games but it was pretty rare that it was a performance that deserved to lose an away game.

      The manager said sticking to your own strengths is the most important thing when it comes to these big fixtures.
        “We cannot plan winning against a side like Chelsea, City, Tottenham, United.

      “You have to play how you play to deny their strengths and push through your strengths. Then you have a chance.

      “The last game we won at Tottenham was pretty early in the season. That makes it all different.

      “We played against Arsenal early in the season (the 4-3 win in 2016). It was one of the best games for a while and we did really well in that game. 

      “So let’s just keep going and we will see what happens.

      “It is not an obvious problem.”



       
      View full article
    • Goosebumps half way through. Its not all bad up there.         
  • Latest Round Up

  • Popular Contributors

×