Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

The BBC


Dougie Do'ins
 Share

Recommended Posts

47 minutes ago, Jack the Sipper said:

 

I think those two things are probably connected.

 

Maybe it's time for Labour ministers to start briefing about the possibility of axing the Beeb due to its right-wing infestation to get some balance back into their reporting.

 

In the meantime they can start by getting shot of the Tory cunts at the top like Robbie Gibbs. It'll no doubt lead to cries of censorship and 1984 coming true from the same crowd that had fuck all to say about the employment of these partisan parasites like Gibbs, Richard Sharp, and Tim Davies in the first instance, but if ever there's a time for Labour to say "fuck em" it's right now.


The way they engage with Labour will be much different due to Labours, maybe perceived, interest in the conservation of national institutions*
 

Blair stacked in, the various iterations of the last cunts stacked it and I m sure at the earliest possible opportunity Starmer will also, it as forever thus.

 

*intentional irony klaxon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Talk about falling upwards. They've only gone and made him Huw Edwards replacement reading the 10'clock news. Being a pervert must be seen as a newsroom asset. 

 

 

 

 

 

Still as long as it keeps him off Match of the Day. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Not sure why the BBC thought it was a good idea to allow this lying, failed blow-hard to promote his new book on their prime time political show anyway. Surely they’re not in the business of helping to enrich the fucking gigantic waste of space?

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something smells here with Kuntsberg and the fat useless piece of blubber .

I think  she leaked him the questions deliberately to make him less shite than he is and a researcher has bubbled her and now the BBC have pulled it before they have to admit what she did .

Might be bollocks obviously but something isn't right with this. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Tj hooker said:

Something smells here with Kuntsberg and the fat useless piece of blubber .

I think  she leaked him the questions deliberately to make him less shite than he is and a researcher has bubbled her and now the BBC have pulled it before they have to admit what she did .

Might be bollocks obviously but something isn't right with this. 

That looks a certainty to me, probably does it every time. The fact other journalists are stepping up to stamp on her grave adds to my suspicions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Sut said:

The only mistake was allowing someone to find out.

Is right.

 

Clear as day she sent them to that fat slug to help him but someone else knew, possibly sent to them on same email by mistake - that is the "mistake" and now they've pulled plug as would blow up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, manwiththestick said:

She'll have a face like a smacked arse all day now.

Nothing will ever top the state of her grid on election night as lab were winning.....She was absolutely fucking spewing.

 

Had a gob on her like a bulldog licking piss off a thistle.

 

And she spent the whole night attempting to talk down lab's win 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, No2 said:

Are we in freedom of information territory here? Are the notes something he would have to share eventually (if requested)?

 

I don't think so, he's not an MP or anything anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Mudface said:

 

I don't think so, he's not an MP or anything anymore.

People can foi her as the bbc is a public service.

 

I FOId an entire department's emails once, then FOId the emails of them all discussing my original FOI and freaking out about how they were gonna handle it.

  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

What a joke. I want the BBC gone. It used to be 'baby out with the bathwater' territory, but it's just ridiculous. Replace it with one AI bot with the prompt 'round up today's news in an impartial way'. That'd be way better than what we've got. 

 

BBC news and politics anyway. I quite like Attenborough. And Match of the Day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...