Quantcast
Man City - the new bitters? - Page 89 - FF - Football Forum - The Liverpool Way Jump to content
Naz17

Man City - the new bitters?

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Yer Ma! said:

Some 'Trump' level trolling going on there... well done

Off topic but one of the replies to that John07 tit regarding Hillsborough is quite good especially this bit:

 

" The failure was not the decision to open the exit gate but not to manage the consequences of that decision e.g. by notifying relevant police and security personnel and making arrangements to disperse the fans once they had entered the ground. There was no crushing or even overcrowding in the area between the turnstiles and the stand, and people were able to move about freely in this area throughout. All police had to do was do exactly what their predecessors did in 1981 and 1988, namely close the entrances to overcrowded pens and direct fans to the quieter entrances. No one did this because, shockingly, no one noticed that an influx of people into the ground would cause crushing in the overcrowded central pens - the connection just wasn't made until people were already dying. Signage was also dreadful meaning that the tunnel leading to the overcrowded central pens was the only obvious entrance to the terraces. There was never an excess of fans in the Leppings Lane End as a whole, they were just badly dispersed, so ticketlessness isn't really relevant either. This wasn't a series of tough decisions that went the wrong way, it was a series of elementary failures in crowd management, personnel coordination and decision making."

 

As someone who was there, I've been saying this for 30 years.

  • Upvote 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, El Rojo said:

Rent free.

 

You love to see it.

 

 

Everybody posting the same phrases like they themselves coined them. 

The same memes and gifs every fucking day.  That twat spitting out her tea and Mike Tyson clapping do my fucking head in.   There are approx 10 that feature every single minute of every single day - absolutely shite!

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, INTORRESTING said:

The same memes and gifs every fucking day.  That twat spitting out her tea and Mike Tyson clapping do my fucking head in.   There are approx 10 that feature every single minute of every single day - absolutely shite!

6JSP8jy.gif

  • Upvote 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 14/01/2020 at 15:58, Jenson said:

Off topic but one of the replies to that John07 tit regarding Hillsborough is quite good especially this bit:

 

" The failure was not the decision to open the exit gate but not to manage the consequences of that decision e.g. by notifying relevant police and security personnel and making arrangements to disperse the fans once they had entered the ground. There was no crushing or even overcrowding in the area between the turnstiles and the stand, and people were able to move about freely in this area throughout. All police had to do was do exactly what their predecessors did in 1981 and 1988, namely close the entrances to overcrowded pens and direct fans to the quieter entrances. No one did this because, shockingly, no one noticed that an influx of people into the ground would cause crushing in the overcrowded central pens - the connection just wasn't made until people were already dying. Signage was also dreadful meaning that the tunnel leading to the overcrowded central pens was the only obvious entrance to the terraces. There was never an excess of fans in the Leppings Lane End as a whole, they were just badly dispersed, so ticketlessness isn't really relevant either. This wasn't a series of tough decisions that went the wrong way, it was a series of elementary failures in crowd management, personnel coordination and decision making."

 

As someone who was there, I've been saying this for 30 years.

I know there have been plenty of Hillsborough threads but I thought it was worth adding something to this that may be of value to anyone having a 'discussion' with 'certain people'. My dad is, if I do say so myself, natural police, and I remember asking him whom he thought was to blame for Hillsborough and dreading the response from a man with a slightly authoritarian air that comes with being natural police. His response was unequivocal: 100% the fault of the police. His reasoning (and this is the bit worth adding to the discussion)? "He [Duckenfield] never walked the ground". As the senior policeman in my home town for the final years of his career, he had responsibility for the local race meeting that took place about 10 times a year. Hardly a Hillsborough-level event, with the numbers at all the meetings in a year put together unlikely to exceed 50,000. It didn't matter though. On the day of every meeting, he would personally walk through every nook and cranny of the course. Why is that there? Why is that different from last time? This is what policing is, and you can never, ever assume that someone else is going to do it for you. If you'd rather ponce around in a fancy uniform surveying the grunts on the battlefield, join a Civil War reenactment society.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 13

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 13/01/2020 at 14:29, Anubis said:


For instance, nobody says ‘custy, la’ like they did in the 80s. It just happens. You’ll have to get over it.

They don't???

 

Er, I mean, yeah Tony, no-one says shit like that anymore.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 14/01/2020 at 15:58, Jenson said:

Off topic but one of the replies to that John07 tit regarding Hillsborough is quite good especially this bit:

 

" The failure was not the decision to open the exit gate but not to manage the consequences of that decision e.g. by notifying relevant police and security personnel and making arrangements to disperse the fans once they had entered the ground. There was no crushing or even overcrowding in the area between the turnstiles and the stand, and people were able to move about freely in this area throughout. All police had to do was do exactly what their predecessors did in 1981 and 1988, namely close the entrances to overcrowded pens and direct fans to the quieter entrances. No one did this because, shockingly, no one noticed that an influx of people into the ground would cause crushing in the overcrowded central pens - the connection just wasn't made until people were already dying. Signage was also dreadful meaning that the tunnel leading to the overcrowded central pens was the only obvious entrance to the terraces. There was never an excess of fans in the Leppings Lane End as a whole, they were just badly dispersed, so ticketlessness isn't really relevant either. This wasn't a series of tough decisions that went the wrong way, it was a series of elementary failures in crowd management, personnel coordination and decision making."

 

As someone who was there, I've been saying this for 30 years.

As somebody who was also there I wholeheartedly agree with this post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 16/01/2020 at 12:18, deiseach said:

I know there have been plenty of Hillsborough threads but I thought it was worth adding something to this that may be of value to anyone having a 'discussion' with 'certain people'. My dad is, if I do say so myself, natural police, and I remember asking him whom he thought was to blame for Hillsborough and dreading the response from a man with a slightly authoritarian air that comes with being natural police. His response was unequivocal: 100% the fault of the police. His reasoning (and this is the bit worth adding to the discussion)? "He [Duckenfield] never walked the ground". As the senior policeman in my home town for the final years of his career, he had responsibility for the local race meeting that took place about 10 times a year. Hardly a Hillsborough-level event, with the numbers at all the meetings in a year put together unlikely to exceed 50,000. It didn't matter though. On the day of every meeting, he would personally walk through every nook and cranny of the course. Why is that there? Why is that different from last time? This is what policing is, and you can never, ever assume that someone else is going to do it for you. If you'd rather ponce around in a fancy uniform surveying the grunts on the battlefield, join a Civil War reenactment society.

Natural Police?  Is this an auto-correct thing as I have never heard that term before.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 14/01/2020 at 16:32, INTORRESTING said:

The same memes and gifs every fucking day.  That twat spitting out her tea and Mike Tyson clapping do my fucking head in.   There are approx 10 that feature every single minute of every single day - absolutely shite!


Spot on. Couldn’t agree more. 
 

43 minutes ago, Red_or_Dead said:

Haha, still never seen the wire!

 

 

 

giphy.gif

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Lizzie Birdsworths Wrinkled Chopper said:

I’ve seen The Wire right through two times now.

 

Just wish there was a common gif to express that with.

giphy.gif

  • Upvote 15

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Lizzie Birdsworths Wrinkled Chopper said:

I’ve seen The Wire right through twice now.

 

Just wish there was a common gif to express that with.

I will not rise to the bait of posting Wire-related nonsense. After all, a man gotta have a code.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, ZonkoVille77 said:

I've never seen a The Wire or The Sopranos.

 

I haven’t. I’ve had The Sopranos box set and the first series of The Wire on DVD for about a decade (both were presents), but never got round to watching them. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What's all this story of flying 22 prossies, sorry, Italian models, over for the lads to, erm, 'celebrate' the routine 6-1 win over villa? Bet the players wives were made up with that one never mind Pep's wife. No wonder she took the kids back to Barcelona.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Available Subscriptions

  • Last Match Report

  • Latest Posts

    • The contracts might have a force majeure clause for that kind of thing.  Or some other catch all clause.
    • So a player is one goal or appearance away from triggering a clause in his contract for either performance-related bonuses or even an extra year added to his contract. The season is then voided, ie the player is effectively denied millions through no fault of his own.    Can he then sue the club for potential lost earnings? Or break from the contract? If that's possible, imagine dozens of such cases of varying degrees and it's another layer to the shitstorm waiting for the higher-ups should the season be cancelled. 
    • That is probably too early but i wouldn't be surprised if its back by late May. I think the government would allow it too. 
    • The Premier League are working on an ambitious plan to restart the season behind closed doors on the first weekend of May with a scheduled finish date of Sunday July 12. The proposals, which will be discussed in detail on a conference call of the 20 clubs on Friday, would need to be endorsed by the Government, public health bodies and the PFA. But they are seen as the best way to mitigate the financial losses and potential legal threats caused by the coronavirus shutdown. The Premier League's best-case scenario of a May resumption stems largely from their obligations to and financial reliance on broadcasters, who have a watertight £3billion-a-year deal which expires on July 31, with next season's deal kicking in the following day.    The Premier League want to restart the season at the beginning of May and finish it by July 12   Sky Sports and other broadcasters could demand as much £762m if the season is not finished It is understood that under the terms of the TV contracts the cut-off point to finish this season is July 16, and if the campaign is not completed by that date Sky Sports, BT Sport and the international rights-holders could demand rebates totalling as much as £762million.   The broadcasters are pushing the Premier League to provide clarity as soon as possible, as they are losing subscribers at a rapid rate and want to know when they can expect their schedules to return to normal. During informal talks between club executives over the last few days, July 12 has emerged as the optimum finish date, and a restart at the beginning of May would build in the potential for more down-time if individual clubs are hit by more cases of the virus.  It remains unclear whether such a timetable is realistic, however, given that the deputy chief medical officer Jenny Harries warned on Sunday that the country could remain in varying degrees of lockdown for up to six months. A restart in May is seen as vital as that is when the clubs are due to receive their final tranche of television money for the season, without which many will struggle to pay the players' wages. The £762m of combined income under threat is not divided equally and would range from £57m for the Premier League winners to £20m for the team who finish bottom. Ironically, the bigger clubs stand to lose more than usual this season if those payments are withheld following last year's changes to the distribution of the overseas television deal, which, unlike the domestic deal, is no longer divided equally but determined by league position The new plan would see games played behind closed doors due to the coronavirus outbreak BT Sport are another of the broadcasters who could be in line for a rebate worth millions The Premier League are aware of the challenges they face in completing the season but until they are told otherwise by the Government that remains their intention. Having suspended the season twice until April 4 and then April 30 they do not want to announce a further delay. The clubs are also conscious that there may have to be changes in order to finish the season. One of the main topics of conversation between executives recently has been about waiving the rules regarding weakened teams.  A number of solutions have been mentioned, including increasing squad sizes from 25 to 29 to enable them to cope with more absences due to illness. One club also raised the question of whether they would be permitted to field a youth team. A more radical idea has been completing the season without promotion and relegation on the grounds that the integrity of the competition is threatened, and there is also no guarantee that the EFL campaign will be completed.    Clubs at the top of the Championship have begun making preparations to take legal action if they are denied promotion, although if the competition is not completed that would weaken their case. The Premier League will continue to liaise with the Government, who have indicated that they are eager for football to resume in some form as soon as it is not considered a public risk and a drain on resources.  If given the go-ahead, matches would be staged with a skeleton broadcasting crew, minimal security and no media, although an ambulance presence would be required at the stadium. One of the problems the league will face is convincing players to return to action after it emerged that they are not insured for coronavirus as it is not listed as a critical illness. A number have sought clarification but are being advised they are not covered. Many players forgo critical illness cover because it can cost £5,000 per year. But Sportsmail knows of a number who have improved their policies since the outbreak.   https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/sportsnews/article-8169229/Premier-League-plan-resume-season-closed-doors-start-MAY.html#comments
  • Latest Round Up

  • Popular Contributors

  • Football Betting Site Betway
  • Online Bingo
×