Quantcast
Intellectual Dark Web - Page 15 - GF - General Forum - The Liverpool Way Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
viRdjil

Intellectual Dark Web

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, viRdjil said:

 

I think he'll find that those countries were already inhabited for thousands of years previously,often by brown people. Those same brown people were also often used to build most of the infrastructure and sites of interest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Captain Turdseye said:

I reckon I could take him in a fight. 

He’s no larger than an action man.  You’d leather him.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 09/07/2019 at 03:43, 3 Stacks said:

The concept of Lauren Southern is hilarious. People found pics that showed she used to date a guy that was of middle-eastern descent or black, I don't remember. 

 

jzJkYEp.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 08/07/2019 at 17:48, Strontium Dog™ said:

Why are Twitter handing out blue ticks to white supremacists?

Because it's profitable. Outrage generates interest, which gets people on the platform. All Twitter cares about is the bottom line. When it's stops being profitable, whether that be through people protesting Twitter and leaving their platform, or people protesting Twitters advertisers and the advertisers leaving the platform, Twitter will remove the element that is the target of the protest. Sorry, that last sentence is a fucking mess.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, ATXRED said:

Because it's profitable. Outrage generates interest, which gets people on the platform. All Twitter cares about is the bottom line. When it's stops being profitable, whether that be through people protesting Twitter and leaving their platform, or people protesting Twitters advertisers and the advertisers leaving the platform, Twitter will remove the element that is the target of the protest. Sorry, that last sentence is a fucking mess.

Nationalise twitter, disincentivize outrageous and misleading content, independently regulate, turn it into a real public service tool. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, ATXRED said:

Because it's profitable. Outrage generates interest, which gets people on the platform. All Twitter cares about is the bottom line. When it's stops being profitable, whether that be through people protesting Twitter and leaving their platform, or people protesting Twitters advertisers and the advertisers leaving the platform, Twitter will remove the element that is the target of the protest. Sorry, that last sentence is a fucking mess.

It’s weird, because they are undoubtedly a left leaning organisation but need a broad section of nutcases to keep everyone interested. 

  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Rico1304 said:

It’s weird, because they are undoubtedly a left leaning organisation but need a broad section of nutcases to keep everyone interested. 

Left leaning,twitter? From my limited knowledge of the platform it seems quite the opposite.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Rico1304 said:

It’s weird, because they are undoubtedly a left leaning organisation but need a broad section of nutcases to keep everyone interested. 

 

A bit like the GF, then.

  • Upvote 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

 

A bit like the GF, then.

Ha. 

 

Maybe they should write the GF guidelines.

 1. Don’t take the Lord’s name in vain. 

2. Everything else is ok. 

 

 

  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Rico1304 said:

It’s weird, because they are undoubtedly a left leaning organisation but need a broad section of nutcases to keep everyone interested. 

Ben Shapiro isn’t really a ‘nutcase’ as such, he’s pretty standard amongst right wing political commentariat both sides of the Atlantic. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, viRdjil said:

Ben Shapiro isn’t really a ‘nutcase’ as such, he’s pretty standard amongst right wing political commentariat both sides of the Atlantic. 

 

I said religious nutter. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:

I said religious nutter. 

I’d a actually argue the least ‘nutty’ thing about him is his Jewishness.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×