Transgender stuff - what's going on?

[AngryOfTuebrook]

1 minute ago, Captain Willard said:

Please provide an example of a skeleton that cannot be identified as male or female ? I think you need to do that if you are saying it’s not definitive 

The one propping up the person that your lecturer was being snarky to.

[Skidfingers McGonical]

30 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

Sex chromosomes, gonads, internal reproductive organs, external genitalia... there are significant determinants of biological sex that rot away before the skeleton.

Skeletons of women have different shaped hips for child bearing. 

 

 

[Colonel Bumcunt]

[Skidfingers McGonical]

First Google search tells you that. 
 

 

[AngryOfTuebrook]

Just now, Skidfingers McGonical said:

Skeletons of women have different shaped hips for child bearing. 

 

 

Did you see the list of other stuff in the post you quoted? 

 

Has Rico stopped obsessing over dicks now we've decided that skellingtons are the one true determinant of sex?

[AngryOfTuebrook]

1 minute ago, Skidfingers McGonical said:

First Google search tells you that. 
 

 

Do you imagine that this is news? Or that it contradicts anything I've posted?

[Rico1304]

9 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

Mad as a box of frogs on acid.

 

I believe in human rights. I believe in equality. I believe that any kid who wants to be called "he" should be called "he" and any kid who wants to be called "she" should be called "she".

What about loos and changing? That’s ok too?  
 

I think in school they should be told not to lie.  As they are children.  

[Rico1304]

4 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

Did you see the list of other stuff in the post you quoted? 

 

Has Rico stopped obsessing over dicks now we've decided that skellingtons are the one true determinant of sex?

You truly have gone mad. 

[Rico1304]

10 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

There have been a fair few where the burial artefacts don't match the skeleton. 

Ha ha ha - so the skeletons that might be trans are always identifiable.  Or a woman who was buried with spears and knives can’t be a warrior woman, she’s got to be trans.  It’s fucking hilarious.  

[AngryOfTuebrook]

1 minute ago, Rico1304 said:

Ha ha ha - so the skeletons that might be trans are always identifiable.  Or a woman who was buried with spears and knives can’t be a warrior woman, she’s got to be trans.  It’s fucking hilarious.  

Making shit up. Again.

[Skidfingers McGonical]

8 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

Did you see the list of other stuff in the post you quoted? 

 

Has Rico stopped obsessing over dicks now we've decided that skellingtons are the one true determinant of sex?

Did you see the bit about the pelvic area? 

 

Why are you asking me about Rico and dick? 
 

[Rico1304]

All those episodes of Silent Witness are going to have to be rewritten. 

[Skidfingers McGonical]

20 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

Do you imagine that this is news? Or that it contradicts anything I've posted?

 I am just responding to your own words.

 

1 hour ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

What a fucking stupid argument. Nobody claims that a skeleton provides a definitive indication of biological sex. 

You come across as a try hard Grandad trying to stay down with the kids. 

[AngryOfTuebrook]

2 minutes ago, Skidfingers McGonical said:

Did you see the bit about the pelvic area? 

 

Why are you asking me about Rico and dick? 
 

Of course I saw the bit about the pelvic area. It obviously wasn't anything new to me.

 

The point is that there are a number of determinants of biological sex - including the dicks that Rico fixates on and those child-bearing pelvises - but no single one, on its own, can him be said to be definitive.

[Strontium]

21 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

Has Rico stopped obsessing over dicks now we've decided that skellingtons are the one true determinant of sex?

 

Would you go out with a woman with a dick?

[AngryOfTuebrook]

Just now, Skidfingers McGonical said:

 I am just responding to your own words.

 

 You come across as try hard Grandad trying to stay down with the kids. 

Is "definitive" a new, trendy word?

[AngryOfTuebrook]

Just now, Strontium said:

Would you go out with a woman with a dick?

No. That's not in any way relevant.

[Rico1304]

2 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

Of course I saw the bit about the pelvic area. It obviously wasn't anything new to me.

 

The point is that there are a number of determinants of biological sex - including the dicks that Rico fixates on and those child-bearing pelvises - but no single one, on its own, can him be said to be definitive.

DNA is. As are chromosomes. 

[Skidfingers McGonical]

1 minute ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

Is "definitive" a new, trendy word?

Wouldn’t know. I’m approaching my mid 40’s, I know my space. 
 

 

 

 

[Rico1304]

2 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

No. That's not in any way relevant.

Just makes you transphobic.  After all they are women. 

[Skidfingers McGonical]

1 minute ago, Rico1304 said:

DNA is. As are chromosomes. 

Yeah but the lippy in the coffin confirms it was a woman. 

[Strontium]

4 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

No. That's not in any way relevant.

 

Why isn't it relevant? I'd say sexual attraction is pretty darn relevant to the existence of sexual identity.

 

The lesbians who are being shamed because they won't date "women" with penises think it's relevant too.

[AngryOfTuebrook]

40 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:

Just makes you transphobic.  After all they are women. 

No it doesn't. Only a prick would argue that it does.

[AngryOfTuebrook]

38 minutes ago, Strontium said:

 

Why isn't it relevant? I'd say sexual attraction is pretty darn relevant to the existence of sexual identity.

 

The lesbians who are being shamed because they won't date "women" with penises think it's relevant too.

Anyone shaming them is a prick.

[Rico1304]

6 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

No it doesn't. Only a prick would argue that it does.

So they aren’t women?