Transgender stuff - what's going on?

[AngryOfTuebrook]

Decent documentary on Channel 4 the other night - The Extraordinary Life of April Ashley. The title says it all: she was, indeed, extraordinary.

[Paulie Dangerously]

The Chicago shooter is reportedly trans. Pictures emerging of her on twitter so it must be true. Surprisingly, she's the first trans woman to be rejected by the community as not a woman or trans and just wearing a disguise. 

 

Be interesting to see how the white, straight, male, incel shooter narrative evolves if this is true. 

[Rico1304]

9 minutes ago, Paulie Dangerously said:

The Chicago shooter is reportedly trans. Pictures emerging of her on twitter so it must be true. Surprisingly, she's the first trans woman to be rejected by the community as not a woman or trans and just wearing a disguise. 

 

Be interesting to see how the white, straight, male, incel shooter narrative evolves if this is true. 

Look, he can’t be wearing a disguise because no man would take advantage in this way!  
 

(I think it was just a disguise wasn’t it?)

[Paulie Dangerously]

12 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:

Look, he can’t be wearing a disguise because no man would take advantage in this way!  
 

(I think it was just a disguise wasn’t it?)

CCTV was reportedly a disguise but the picture from his sound cloud which has emerged as well certainly looks like she could be trans. 

 

Just amazing how she's been disavowed by the community instantly with people being shouted down for the possibility that she could be trans. 

 

 

[Section_31]

21 minutes ago, Paulie Dangerously said:

CCTV was reportedly a disguise but the picture from his sound cloud which has emerged as well certainly looks like she could be trans. 

 

Just amazing how she's been disavowed by the community instantly with people being shouted down for the possibility that she could be trans. 

 

 

 

You idiots! You've captured his stunt double!

[AngryOfTuebrook]

48 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:

Look, he can’t be wearing a disguise because no man would take advantage in this way!  

Literally nobody ever said that. It's like the argument over Muslim women who choose to wear the veil; just because the possibility exists of some cunt dressing up to avoid the law, that is obviously not a reason to restrict the human rights of millions of innocent people.

[AngryOfTuebrook]

40 minutes ago, Paulie Dangerously said:

the picture from his sound cloud which has emerged as well certainly looks like she could be trans. 

 

Really? If you saw someone in the street looking like that, you'd think "that bloke's a dickhead", not "there's a trans woman".

[Rico1304]

11 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

Literally nobody ever said that. It's like the argument over Muslim women who choose to wear the veil; just because the possibility exists of some cunt dressing up to avoid the law, that is obviously not a reason to restrict the human rights of millions of innocent people.

Millions of innocent people?  I’m lost. 
 

Which human rights are being restricted? 

[AngryOfTuebrook]

1 minute ago, Rico1304 said:

Millions of innocent people?  I’m lost. 
 

Which human rights are being restricted? 

The rights of Muslim women who choose to wear a veil, in countries where it's banned and those in countries where racist cranks use "security" as an excuse to call for restrictions on Muslim women's right to dress as they see fit.

 

Now we have one cunt dressing up as a woman and idiot noisemakers who want to deny human rights to trans women (there never seems to be the same impulse against trans men, oddly) are pretending that that somehow validates their bigotry.

[Rico1304]

11 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

The rights of Muslim women who choose to wear a veil, in countries where it's banned and those in countries where racist cranks use "security" as an excuse to call for restrictions on Muslim women's right to dress as they see fit.

 

Now we have one cunt dressing up as a woman and idiot noisemakers who want to deny human rights to trans women (there never seems to be the same impulse against trans men, oddly) are pretending that that somehow validates their bigotry.

Oh right, crossing the streams.  
 

which human rights are they wanting to deny?  

[AngryOfTuebrook]

Just now, Rico1304 said:

Oh right, crossing the streams.  

I don't know what this means.

[Rico1304]

1 minute ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

I don't know what this means.

Ghostbusters. I thought you meant millions of TW. 

[AngryOfTuebrook]

1 minute ago, Rico1304 said:

Oh right, crossing the streams.  
 

which human rights are they wanting to deny?  

Anti-Muslim racists want to deny women the right to dress in the way they choose; it's about the rights to privacy and bodily autonomy.

 

Anti-trans activists want to deny trans women all sorts of rights (as you surely must know) right down to the fundamental right to one's own identity.

[AngryOfTuebrook]

1 minute ago, Rico1304 said:

Ghostbusters. I thought you meant millions of TW. 

I thought it was a Ghostbusters reference, but I'd never heard it used like that.

[Rico1304]

4 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

Anti-Muslim racists want to deny women the right to dress in the way they choose; it's about the rights to privacy and bodily autonomy.

 

Anti-trans activists want to deny trans women all sorts of rights (as you surely must know) right down to the fundamental right to one's own identity.

Which rights are being denied TW? I think this is 4 times now.  

[Anubis]

He dressed as a woman to evade detection and get away. He’s worn a woman’s outfit in a rap video he made. So has Eminem. On his social media profile he identified as he/him. I think the trans thing is a stretch. 

[AngryOfTuebrook]

1 hour ago, Rico1304 said:

Which rights are being denied TW? I think this is 4 times now.  

In different places in the world, you could tick off Articles 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12 (especially 12), 16, 19, 23, 25 and 27 of the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

[Rico1304]

12 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

In different places in the world, you could tick off Articles 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12 (especially 12), 16, 19, 23, 25 and 27 of the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

I’m talking U.K.  

[AngryOfTuebrook]

58 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:

I’m talking U.K.  

I wasn't. Moreover, I wasn't just talking about restrictions that are in place; I was talking about the restrictions that anti-trans (and anti-Muslim) people argue for.

[Rico1304]

Oh ok. In that case, in the U.K. what rights don’t they have?  
 

Good win for Maya Forstater today.  Common sense applies again. 

[Rico1304]

So that’s two court decisions in a matter of months supporting the fact that, well, that men can’t become women.  Imagine having to have that supported by the courts? 

[Rico1304]

Brilliant. British triathlon create an open category alongside womens.  Everyone happy.  

[Rico1304]

 

[Paulie Dangerously]

16 hours ago, Rico1304 said:

Brilliant. British triathlon create an open category alongside womens.  Everyone happy.  

This is the sensible approach. If they truly want to compete for the love of competition then this is the perfect solution. 

[Rico1304]

From the judgment yesterday;

 

‘Doesn’t have to be conducted in the most moderate terms possible to be legitimate and acceptable’.