Transgender stuff - what's going on?

[Rico1304]

I for one can’t think why women are worried

 

 

[Section_31]

10 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:

I for one can’t think why women are worried

 

 

 

Don't think much of the Proclaimers' latest release.

[CapeRed]

40 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:

I for one can’t think why women are worried

 

 

 

[CapeRed]

Fuckin brave arent they hiding behind sunglasses and scarves

[Rico1304]

1 minute ago, CapeRed said:

Fuckin brave arent they hiding behind sunglasses and scarves

One of them wore his work T-shirt. Silly boy. 
 

Although in good news FINA has today approved a policy where no male who’s been through puberty can swim as a woman.  

[Bjornebye]

1 hour ago, Rico1304 said:

I for one can’t think why women are worried

 

 

I don't get it, are they calling women fossils or trans women? 

[Rico1304]

The Chair of FINA said that it’s imperative to follow the science and views of the women impacted by the decision.  Someone best tell AoT.  

[Rico1304]

Just now, Bjornebye said:

I don't get it, are they calling women fossils or trans women? 

They are calling the women fossils for not believing the gender bollocks spouted by blokes. 

[Bjornebye]

2 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:

They are calling the women fossils for not believing the gender bollocks spouted by blokes. 

All very weird. That fella screaming needs a punch 

[Captain Howdy]

When did Jonny Bairstow join the police?

[AngryOfTuebrook]

41 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:

The Chair of FINA said that it’s imperative to follow the science and views of the women impacted by the decision.  Someone best tell AoT.  

I feel so silly now, after arguing *checks notes* that decisions about participation in sports are best left to the governing bodies of those sports.

[Rico1304]

38 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

I feel so silly now, after arguing *checks notes* that decisions about participation in sports are best left to the governing bodies of those sports.

Ha ha but why are they excluding women? Because your argument has always been TWAW. 
 

I seem to remember you saying the science was moving towards there being more than 2 sexes. Changed your mind? 

[AngryOfTuebrook]

1 minute ago, Rico1304 said:

Ha ha but why are they excluding women? Because your argument has always been TWAW. 
 

I seem to remember you saying the science was moving towards there being more than 2 sexes. Changed your mind? 

No. Ask me about science and I'll repeat what science still says. Ask me my opinion on sports governance and I'll repeat that the decisions are best made by the governing bodies (and not some obsessed crank from a football forum).

[Rico1304]

13 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

No. Ask me about science and I'll repeat what science still says. Ask me my opinion on sports governance and I'll repeat that the decisions are best made by the governing bodies (and not some obsessed crank from a football forum).

It still says there are two sexes. Phew. Well done. 
 

What if football says TW can play despite going through puberty and swimming says they can’t? 

[AngryOfTuebrook]

36 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:

What if football says TW can play despite going through puberty and swimming says they can’t? 

 

51 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

Ask me my opinion on sports governance and I'll repeat that the decisions are best made by the governing bodies (and not some obsessed crank from a football forum).

.

[Rico1304]

11 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

 

.

Ok. So a TW couldn’t swim on a Friday but could play football on the Saturday.  It’s binary, fair or unfair.  Fucking pathetic. 

[Moo]

On 18/06/2022 at 15:29, No2 said:

I was at a mini World Cup today. Over 1200 players, tonnes of both boys and girls teams. I stumbled across one match, looked to be an u13s girls match. In the 5 minutes I watched a young boy tore it up, I can only assume this boy is a girl or thinks he's a girl or is allowed to play as a girl or kicked up enough stink somebody said he can be a girl. The world is fucked, that much I do know. The group of young girls will now always remember losing a final because the other team had a boy in their team.

An interesting point.  Why would that person be so much better unless reached puberty?  What are the physical advantages at that age?  

ps, what made you think the person was a boy?

 

 

[Rico1304]

5 minutes ago, Moo said:

An interesting point.  Why would that person be so much better unless reached puberty?  What are the physical advantages at that age?  

ps, what made you think the person was a boy?

 

 

Are you seriously suggesting that a 13 yr old boy and 13 yr old girl have the same athletic performance?  

[Moo]

1 minute ago, Rico1304 said:

Are you seriously suggesting that a 13 yr old boy and 13 yr old girl have the same athletic performance?  

I was asking questions, you know that thing that leads to better understanding.

Regards to football I've seen plenty of girls match boys up to starting senior school.  After that maybe physical divergence accelerates.

[Rico1304]

3 minutes ago, Moo said:

I was asking questions, you know that thing that leads to better understanding.

Regards to football I've seen plenty of girls match boys up to starting senior school.  After that maybe physical divergence accelerates.

Ok. 
 

Boys athletic performance after puberty is hugely superior to girls.  The divergence starts about 11 and widens every year thereafter.  But you know this already, from the school you went to and boys got better than you.  
 

Remember when the US Womens football team were hammered by a male u15 team?  
 

Any denial of this is frankly mental.  

[Strontium]

Usain Bolt was running 21.81 in the 200m at age 13. It would have won him the silver medal in the 2020 Olympic women's event. Even at that age the physical difference is apparent.

[Section_31]

Hate these words, terf, cis and all that bollocks. If racism taught us anything, it's that reducing someone to a word makes it easier to dehumanise them.

 

[Rico1304]

11 minutes ago, Strontium said:

Usain Bolt was running 21.81 in the 200m at age 13. It would have won him the silver medal in the 2020 Olympic women's event. Even at that age the physical difference is apparent.

It’s just astounding that anyone can deny reality like this. I thought the The Emperor’s New Clothes  was just a kids story but it’s happening right before our eyes. 

[Moo]

19 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:

Ok. 
 

Boys athletic performance after puberty is hugely superior to girls.  The divergence starts about 11 and widens every year thereafter.  But you know this already, from the school you went to and boys got better than you.  
 

Remember when the US Womens football team were hammered by a male u15 team?  
 

Any denial of this is frankly mental.  

Whaaaaat?  Lots of assumptions there.

Why would I ask if I already knew?

 

Yes after puberty. You're referring to U15s the previous poster mentioned U13s, could have been a load of 10 year olds as far as I know.

When I went to school, boys and girls were "prohibited" from playing in mixed sports once they finished juniors but nobody really explained why, that's just how it was, so you wouldn't really know how much better boys were at 11-12.

I suppose I could have Googled it and perhaps avoided assumptions and sarc-y answers.  But this is a forum where interaction should be welcomed.

I should know better on this subject where you're concerned.

[Moo]

2 minutes ago, Moo said:

 

Duplicate post