Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Transgender stuff - what's going on?


Gym Beglin
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

Yeah, he really is. He seems to take outliers and use them to push his strange dislike as if it's the norm. I've already stated my concerns about this subject in this thread, but none of it is based on some mentalist talking about sucking female penises. Weird.

That's true. I wouldn't use David Icke as a legitimate source for royal genealogy. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Rico1304 said:

Rachel McKinnon is a trans woman, activist and athlete.  Although she’s back tracking on it now. Thinks she went too far.  So.  

Well David Icke was a professional footballer, a journalist, member of the green party and believes the royal family are interdimensional reptilians. He's not backtracking, he doesnt think he's gone far enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Bobby Hundreds said:

Well David Icke was a professional footballer, a journalist, member of the green party and believes the royal family are interdimensional reptilians. He's not backtracking, he doesnt think he's gone far enough.

That makes zero, and I mean zero sense.  

 

But. Say if Rachel was influencing LGBT policy in say our civil service.  That’d be important right?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Rico1304 said:

"There is currently no data to reflect the number who may be unhappy in their new gender or who may opt to detransition to their biological sex."

 

Probably the key sentence in there, although...

 

"I didn't think any change was going to be enough in the end and I thought it was better to work on changing how I felt about myself, than changing my body,"

 

Obviously must also be listened to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

I don’t think we should base our judgements on something that impacts a lot of people based off of one lunatic. 

Pretty incredible that that actually needs to be said. And it applies to most of the shit posted in here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...