Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Virgil Van Dijk


Paco
 Share

Recommended Posts

Better than Lovren, and better value than signing Van Dijk for £70m?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fifth_Element_General_Belt_1_4957.jpg

 

I should get my eyes tested as the names on that list appear as blurs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I fully understand the hesitance given the VVD fee. But out of interest, who are the other central defenders who are good enough to improve us enough, and who offer better value for money?

 

The whole world knows we have cash and need a central defender. I suspect we would be quoted stupid money for even modest defenders.

 

I would pinch my nose due to the stench of the game and its largesse, then I would slap the money down to sign VVD.

 

Mind you, I really like the look of Nathan Ake. Would Chelsea do business with us? How much would he cost? He has pace and is an athletic sort of central defender. VVD is clearly better in the air, but I think Nathan Ake is a good player.

Ake's signing for Bournemouth for 25mil isn't he? And isn't he a left back?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've all seen VVD play. And I don't think one of us here thinks he's not a massive upgrade on anything we have.

 

If van dijk helped us win the league, then the fee isn't important.

 

I say break the bank. Fuck it

 

Unless of course we didn't win the league and we've spunked SEVENTY MILLION POUNDS on one player, which for anyone but City, Chelsea or United, will mean severely hampered future budgets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've all seen VVD play. And I don't think one of us here thinks he's not a massive upgrade on anything we have.

 

If van dijk helped us win the league, then the fee isn't important.

 

I say break the bank. Fuck it

I haven't noticed him much at all to be honest. I dont watch MOTD and only saw him when he played against us but I am not really interested in the opposition. Saints have a very good record against us in recent seasons and their defence is most of the reason why. How much of that is simply down to VVD I have no idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've all seen VVD play. And I don't think one of us here thinks he's not a massive upgrade on anything we have.

 

If van dijk helped us win the league, then the fee isn't important.

 

I say break the bank. Fuck it

Is VVD gonna look as effective when he is asked to defend in a team that isn't camped in its own half with 9 men behind the ball most of the time?

 

He is gonna face exactly what our existing centre halves face and that is being on the half way line watching our useless full backs lose the ball high up and chasing back as the ball is smashed long into the space they have vacated or straight at him as runners bear down on him with zero protection in front of him.....a totally different game.

 

Carra spoke recently about how exposed he felt defending in our set up in that game in Australia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've all seen VVD play. And I don't think one of us here thinks he's not a massive upgrade on anything we have.

 

If van dijk helped us win the league, then the fee isn't important.

 

I say break the bank. Fuck it

 

That's true, but Lovren looked pretty damn good there, too.  I think he's a clear upgrade, yea, but for 60m?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is VVD gonna look as effective when he is asked to defend in a team that isn't camped in its own half with 9 men behind the ball most of the time?

 

He is gonna face exactly what our existing centre halves face and that is being on the half way line watching our useless full backs lose the ball high up and chasing back as the ball is smashed long into the space they have vacated or straight at him as runners bear down on him with zero protection in front of him.....a totally different game.

 

Carra spoke recently about how exposed he felt defending in our set up in that game in Australia.

He's quick... so that alone would help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shit or get off the pot Springs to mind

 

I strongly disagree. I don't think it's a case of doubling the clubs transfer record on a player who's just coming back from a serious enough injury or get off the pot. i believe there is a middle ground that can still achieve success. In fact one could argue, with finite resources, it would be more likely to acheive success, given it's a 25 man squad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

£60m is crazy but on the other hand he's clearly more than £10m better than John Stones.

Is he 10 million better than more competent defenders who didn't go for 50.million though?

 

 

The prospect of spending that much is definetly influencing peoples opinions more than the ability of the player.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't really know for sure. Hard to gauge really.

Very much so I just can't see it though that we need to spend that much on one player to shore up our defence by what 10 goals a season (broadly speaking and i know it isn't that linear)

 

I'd rather we fixed our problems all over the park and get the depth we want....of course if we do that and pay 70m for VVD then fair do's but can you see us doing that...

 

I'm just not keen on spending that much on him. For £60-£70m you should be getting the best CB in the world for that and he isn't it.

 

We need Keita or someone like him to protect the back 4. Look at the difference Kante makes to Chelsea.

 

A Kante type and a 30m centre half would be a much better way to do 70m than just VVD in my view.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very much so I just can't see it though that we need to spend that much on one player to shore up our defence by what 10 goals a season (broadly speaking and i know it isn't that linear)

 

I'd rather we fixed our problems all over the park and get the depth we want....of course if we do that and pay 70m for VVD then fair do's but can you see us doing that...

 

I'm just not keen on spending that much on him. For £60-£70m you should be getting the best CB in the world for that and he isn't it.

 

We need Keita or someone like him to protect the back 4. Look at the difference Kante makes to Chelsea.

 

A Kante type and a 30m centre half would be a much better way to do 70m than just VVD in my view.

Keita isn't a holding player. If we get him, we'd still alternate that role between Hendo and Can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is VVD gonna look as effective when he is asked to defend in a team that isn't camped in its own half with 9 men behind the ball most of the time?

 

He is gonna face exactly what our existing centre halves face and that is being on the half way line watching our useless full backs lose the ball high up and chasing back as the ball is smashed long into the space they have vacated or straight at him as runners bear down on him with zero protection in front of him.....a totally different game.

 

Carra spoke recently about how exposed he felt defending in our set up in that game in Australia.

True, but that applies to every centreback.

 

VVD has pace, power, height, strength, great in the air, good passer, he I also vocal and he's a leader too.

 

Just buy the fucker already.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...