Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Virgil Van Dijk


Paco
 Share

Recommended Posts

It's all about the fella in charge, he can get the Screwfix stuff to look as good as the Ronseal, but, ultimately, it'll look shit after a year and will need loads of maintenance and be back to square one.

That's what I said and he mumbled something about just give it one coat and walked off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think what Kreuger is saying is that he is a nightmare to deal with and only in our dreams can we sign him.

 

He also said Funnneee needs to chill the fuck our and get off Wikipedia for a couple of hours.

I see what you did there. He must live on Elm Street.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/40953662

 

Southampton captain Virgil van Dijk is "not for sale", according to club chairman Ralph Krueger.
 
The Netherlands centre-back, 26, handed in a transfer request last week and it is understood he wanted to move to Premier League rivals Liverpool.
 
"Virgil is not for sale in this window - it's not personal," he said of the player that joined the club in 2015.
 
"It's not about him, it's about an overall much, much, much bigger picture - a change of course for Southampton."
 
On Monday, Chinese businessman Jisheng Gao and his family completed a deal to buy 80% of the south coast club.
 
Krueger suggested that the Saints wanted some stability in their squad, adding: "We want to mature, we want to be a team that can profit from synergies that create a much more attractive football and a better product for the fans, and gives us a chance to get back into Europe.
 
"That's one player in this whole equation of 25 and it is the visible one. But for us it's the principle and it's the path and it's the statement we need to make to get to a new space as a club.
 
"We are very, very adamant about carrying this through."
 
Van Dijk did not feature in Saturday's Premier League opener against Swansea because of a virus. Saints manager Mauricio Pellegrino, who ordered the Dutchman to train alone in the summer, said before the weekend that he wants the defender to stay.
 
The Netherlands international been strongly linked with a move to Liverpool this summer as well as attracting interest from Premier League champions Chelsea and Manchester City.
 
However, the Anfield club said they ended their interest in June after Saints said they were going to report them to the Premier League for making an alleged illegal approach.
 
Van Dijk signed a new six-year contract in May 2016, having joined for £13m from Celtic in September 2015.

 

 

That entire statement belongs in the corporate bellendery  thread over on the GF.

 

"profit from synergies that create a much more attractive football and a better product for the fans"

 

"That's one player in this whole equation of 25 and it is the visible one. But for us it's the principle and it's the path and it's the statement we need to make to get to a new space as a club."

 

ugh-gif-15.gif?fit=415%2C212

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The boat has sailed. Had we gone about our business properly instead of dicking around he might be here already. Forget it, let's move on. Chalk it down as yet another transfer that we let slip from our grasp. Something's never change, no matter which clown is in charge of transfers at this club.

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This deal's been snake-bitten from the start. The apology was embarrassing, but besides that I don't think the club did much wrong. He clearly was never for sale and It's the reason why we had to go as far as we did with the underhanded tactics.

 

The fact that we haven't moved on to another target yet is the real problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...