Virgil Van Dijk

[Numero Veinticinco]

Well, when he controls the thee players via telepathy, I’ll start blaming it on him. Incredible.

[3 Stacks]

Your expectations for the most expensive defender in the history of football are ridiculously low. That's it. 

[Evil_Ways]

Fine. You argue things badly to the death for entire days on here, so I'm alright not getting into it with you on this subject.

 

Still, "excellent"? Not a good choice of words for a 75m centre back who hasn't helped us keep a single clean sheet yet.

Hardly down to Van Dijk that. Infact he's not been at fault for any goals yet. How anyone can think he hasnt been class since coming in is beyond me.

[Numero Veinticinco]

Hyperbole doesn’t really work with me, I’m afraid. Thinking he should be responsible for other players because of his fee is a bit ridiculous.

[dirk grout]

Well, when he controls the thee players via telepathy, I’ll start blaming it on him. Incredible.

 

You're embarrassing yoursefl agin her mate. Surelty the most expensive defender ever must be able to stop the Wanyama scoring? I'm with you 3 stacks, on the ball as ever.

[Numero Veinticinco]

You're embarrassing yoursefl agin her mate. Surelty the most expensive defender ever must be able to stop the Wanyama scoring? I'm with you 3 stacks, on the ball as ever.

You make a fair point. 75m and the cunt can't even fly.

[3 Stacks]

You're embarrassing yoursefl agin her mate. Surelty the most expensive defender ever must be able to stop the Wanyama scoring? I'm with you 3 stacks, on the ball as ever.

 

 

Hyperbole doesn’t really work with me, I’m afraid. Thinking he should be responsible for other players because of his fee is a bit ridiculous.

 

Quote me where I said he's in control of what others are doing. Don't put words in my mouth. 

 

I don't care how good he is meant to be or how much you two clowns were jerking off over the possibility of us signing him, the reality is that he hasn't been very good at Liverpool.

 

He's partly responsible for Swansea, was part of a complete meltdown against West Brom, and like I said, I won't blame him for giving up a pen yesterday, but the reality is that he was on the wrong side of Lamela in the box and anything can happen. 

 

But yeah, he's been "excellent". You're out of your mind.

[Anny Road]

Only scored 1 goal as well. A winner in the Derby. Should have 3 by now for 75m.

[dockers_strike]

Fine. You argue things badly to the death for entire days on here, so I'm alright not getting into it with you on this subject.

 

Still, "excellent"? Not a good choice of words for a 75m centre back who hasn't helped us keep a single clean sheet yet. 

 

What a ridiculous comment. Seriously the lad has played what 4 games for us and you think just because he cost £75m which was not his decision to pay that that he should have single handedly prevented us conceeding a goal. Sheesh no wonder the match threads are so up and down.

 

Oh sorry if you think that is a criticism of you in any way.

[dirk grout]

You make a fair point. 75m and the cunt can't even fly.

Being serious for a moment, Spurs had 70% posession yesterday and never looked like scoring. ITs not just VVD. Karius and Robertson are definite improvements although not difficult admittedly. If not for the Wanyama wonder goal it looked as though we may see it out which would not have been conceivable previously. 

[RobbieOR]

Quote me where I said he's in control of what others are doing. Don't put words in my mouth. 

 

I don't care how good he is meant to be or how much you two clowns were jerking off over the possibility of us signing him, the reality is that he hasn't been very good at Liverpool.

 

He's partly responsible for Swansea, was part of a complete meltdown against West Brom, and like I said, I won't blame him for giving up a pen yesterday, but the reality is that he was on the wrong side of Lamela in the box and anything can happen. 

 

But yeah, he's been "excellent". You're out of your mind.

 

Having a go at him for being the wrong side of Lamela is wrong because Lamela was offside when he was behind him 

[Numero Veinticinco]

Hahahah. The wrong side of Lemala. So you’re saying he should have played him onside?

 

Oh my Christ.

 

I didn’t say you said anything about being in control, so don’t put words in my mouth and make things up. Your reading comprehension is as poor as your knowledge of defending.

 

Clown indeed.

[Numero Veinticinco]

Being serious for a moment, Spurs had 70% posession yesterday and never looked like scoring. ITs not just VVD. Karius and Robertson are definite improvements although not difficult admittedly. If not for the Wanyama wonder goal it looked as though we may see it out which would not have been conceivable previously.

Yes mate, plus they’re a very good attacking side. They’re a top four capable side who are going to create chances against almost all teams. They dicked United last time out. They got lucky.

 

Banging on about VVD being ‘a bit shit’ is so incredibly cunty.

[dirk grout]

Quote me where I said he's in control of what others are doing. Don't put words in my mouth. 

 

I don't care how good he is meant to be or how much you two clowns were jerking off over the possibility of us signing him, the reality is that he hasn't been very good at Liverpool.

 

He's partly responsible for Swansea, was part of a complete meltdown against West Brom, and like I said, I won't blame him for giving up a pen yesterday, but the reality is that he was on the wrong side of Lamela in the box and anything can happen. 

 

But yeah, he's been "excellent". You're out of your mind.

1. I wouldn't put anything in your mouth you dirty devil

2. Its called wanking

3. Blaming him for Swansea is ludicrous. Years of under funding from various governments is the root cause of swanseas plight yet you want to finger VVD. (Again, dirty devil)

[dirk grout]

Having a go at him for being the wrong side of Lamela is wrong because Lamela was offside when he was behind him 

 

This is obvious but I don't really think 3 stacks gets this footy lark.

[3 Stacks]

Having a go at him for being the wrong side of Lamela is wrong because Lamela was offside when he was behind him 

 

 

Hahahah. The wrong side of Lemala. So you’re saying he should have played him onside?

 

Oh my Christ.

 

I didn’t say you said anything about being in control, so don’t put words in my mouth and make things up. Your reading comprehension is as poor as your knowledge of defending.

 

Clown indeed.

 

 

This is obvious but I don't really think 3 stacks gets this footy lark.

 

https://streamja.com/p6j

 

This is the incident. He loses the header then Lamela gets by him. Nothing to do with playing him offside. 

 

Should probably look at the incident first before acting smug. You guys are falling over yourselves for a guy who has so obviously been a bit wank. It's crazy.

[Numero Veinticinco]

Oh God.

[3 Stacks]

Oh God.

 

Haha, you so clearly have nothing to say. It's fine, I didn't want to get into it with you in the first place because you're insufferable even arguing things that I generally agree with, but then you started acting like a twat. 

 

I'll just leave it there now because this will never end. He's not been good, that simple. Get over it. 

[dockers_strike]

Having a go at him for being the wrong side of Lamela is wrong because Lamela was offside when he was behind him 

 

Out of +ve. Can some please add +ve on my behalf.

[johnsusername]

I wish he'd booted lamela up the arse now. And then gave him a chinese burn as he lay prone on the ground. 

[Mark M]

I thought he was top class yesterday.

 

Yep. I thought he won a lot in the air and made some really good interceptions and tackles yesterday. 

[BCM]

He's a class player and the more he gets fitter and used to the way we play he will only get better.

[Bobby Hundreds]

Yep. I thought he won a lot in the air and made some really good interceptions and tackles yesterday.

 

He absolutely did. He's going to be class.

[The Guest]

Haha, you so clearly have nothing to say. It's fine, I didn't want to get into it with you in the first place because you're insufferable even arguing things that I generally agree with, but then you started acting like a twat.

 

I'll just leave it there now because this will never end. He's not been good, that simple. Get over it.

You’re absolutely clueless.

[redheart]

It would help if he did not have a massive open door of a midfield in front of him