Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

The New Cricket Thread


A_S
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest Pistonbroke
Just now, Jairzinho said:

Excruciating commentary. Fucking hell.

I had to laugh when they were saying Stokes had pulled a calf based on the fact he felt his leg. Especially when he ran perfectly for the next ball that came his way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Pistonbroke said:

I had to laugh when they were saying Stokes had pulled a calf based on the fact he felt his leg. Especially when he ran perfectly for the next ball that came his way. 

Yes, followed by a conversation about wins based on which dressing room you're in.

 

They should be made to listen to Benaud. If you've got fuck all to say be quiet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Pistonbroke
Just now, Jairzinho said:

Yes, followed by a conversation about wins based on which dressing room you're in.

 

They should be made to listen to Benaud. If you've got fuck all to say be quiet.

I get the feeling all the neutral commentators want NZ to win, nothing against that, that is up to them, but they are chatting bollocks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Pistonbroke
Just now, Jairzinho said:

We need wickets. NZ will be happy enough to plod along at 4.5/5 an over and set it up for the last 15.

Yeah, just milked that first over off Rashid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Pistonbroke said:

I get the feeling all the neutral commentators want NZ to win, nothing against that, that is up to them, but they are chatting bollocks. 

I just find the shorter the format of the game the worse the commentary team.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Pistonbroke
1 minute ago, Jairzinho said:

I just find the shorter the format of the game the worse the commentary team.

 

 

 

 

 

Don't worry, a couple of wickets and they'll forget what they were previously saying as they change tact. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Pistonbroke
Just now, Agt Provocateur said:

That really concerned me. It was effortless. Nobody apart from Woakes has held an end up. 

I'd be tempted to take Rashid out of the attack until we get another wicket. These two are set and although Rashid is a wicket taking bowler he is expensive at times, plus this wicket is not helping him as of yet. Just cheap runs at the moment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Pistonbroke said:

I'd be tempted to take Rashid out of the attack until we get another wicket. These two are set and although Rashid is a wicket taking bowler he is expensive at times, plus this wicket is not helping him as of yet. Just cheap runs at the moment. 

I don't see where the next wicket is coming from. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Pistonbroke
Just now, Agt Provocateur said:

I don't see where the next wicket is coming from. 

Nicholls has reached his average, so hopefully he makes a mistake. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Stickman said:

Have to say this is  looking pretty comfortable for New Zealan at the moment the game is just meandering along .

We're setting a "meander along at will" field as well. It's like we've decided we're fine for them to get 270/280.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Pistonbroke

Hopefully Stokes into the attack instead of Rashid. I'd also be tempted to bring Archer back for one or two overs. Need to break this partnership up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Pistonbroke
3 minutes ago, TK421 said:

Keep Rashid on for two more.  No point bowling a leggie for two overs, it takes a little while to get rhythm and big revs. 

 

Nothing in the wicket for him though, basically hoping for a mistake, these two are set though and just happy to milk the bowling atm. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...