Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?


Sugar Ape
 Share

Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?  

218 members have voted

  1. 1. Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?



Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Creator Supreme said:

Why don't they fuck her off? She's about as Socialist as Farage and now she's just acting like a cunt with an agenda!

 

If you don't want to be in the Labour party Madge, just fucking quit you soft cunt and go and join the GIMP's!

Was the same with Berger, Umuna and Tom Watson to be honest. This stuff isn't just part of what they campaign on or talk about, it's the be all and end all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Rico1304 said:

Panic over, had him kicked out of first class. Protested his innocence but clearly didn’t know how to eat his fruit with a knife and fork. Oik 

 

Sounds like you were denying him his right to self-determination. You're lucky that's okay now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:

Interesting to see how this will be dismissed/ignored/put down to Mossad

 

https://www.thejc.com/comment/comment/dear-jeremy-corbyn-richard-horton-resignation-letter-1.481017

A new Jewish conspiracy theory: the Jews are promoting anti-Semitism.

 

"JVL is an organisation established for the sole purpose to obfuscate and apologise for antisemitism within the Labour party."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, AngryofTuebrook said:

A new Jewish conspiracy theory: the Jews are promoting anti-Semitism.

 

"JVL is an organisation established for the sole purpose to obfuscate and apologise for antisemitism within the Labour party."

Mmm, is that dismissed or Mossad?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The same old rehashed bullshit.

I came close to leaving the party when the video emerged of you saying that "[British Zionists] having lived in this country for a very long time, probably all their lives, they don't understand English irony either."

I believe that you were using "Zionist" as a euphemism for "Jew". I find it impossible to interpret it any other way. 

 

How can you find it "impossible" not to interpret a comment about the specific actions of a specific handful of Zionists as a slur on all Jews?

 

I though you'd trailed that as if it might contain something - anything - that hasn't already been shown to be either bullshit or flat-out lying.  It didn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Rico1304 said:

Mmm, is that dismissed or Mossad?  

Dismissed.  Because it's laughably false.  I don't believe a word of his heart-wrenching "How can I read to my poor daughter, if I work with anti-Semitic Stalinists" arse-wipe.

 

There's nothing of substance in that piece.

 

Never heard of the cunt.  Don't want to hear of him again.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, AngryofTuebrook said:

A new Jewish conspiracy theory: the Jews are promoting anti-Semitism.

 

"JVL is an organisation established for the sole purpose to obfuscate and apologise for antisemitism within the Labour party."

The wrong type of Jews.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, AngryofTuebrook said:

A new Jewish conspiracy theory: the Jews are promoting anti-Semitism.

 

"JVL is an organisation established for the sole purpose to obfuscate and apologise for antisemitism within the Labour party."

That article is a brilliant piece of fiction. The wreath bit is untrue.  The Hezbollah bit is untrue, if it refers to Sajid Javid's recent decision to proscribe Hezbollah. Labour didn't contest this decision. The "defence" of the mural bit is untrue too. Or at least dishonest. It suggests that Corbyn was aware that it was antisemitic and then defended it. That's simply not true.

 

The letter also contains vast amounts of hearsay. The author is obviously fond of hearsay as he appears to believe the totally unsubstantiated claim that Corbyn tried to block Williamson's suspension. Then there's the offensive and often used "wrong kind of Jews" rhetoric. And the logically crazy assertion that Corbyn can stop his supporters (not necessarily Labour Party members) from tweeting abusive stuff. He can ask them too. He has. That's all he can do. We never see any other politicians being held personally responsible for bad things that their voters and supporters say. Just Corbyn. The bit about the CLP motions is also dishonest. It's a correct response to untrue, or at least highly contestable, claims that the party is institutionally antisemitic. The comments on Berger are twisted too. People have legitimate grounds to hold her to account for being non-committal when refusing to answer when asked if she was planning to leave the party. The bit about the Observer report into interference in the disciplinary process is untrue. See the emails above. There is no evidence to suggest attempts to "protect" people. There's been a common sense approach adopted, a reasonable request to seek clarification on certain matters, whilst at all times leaving the option of the originally suggested sanction - suspension - on the table. 

 

But, apart from all of the above, it's a great letter... 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Nelly-Torres said:

We never see any other politicians being held personally responsible for bad things that their voters and supporters say. Just Corbyn.

Exhibit A 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47454993 

When the Tories finally pull their fingers out and discipline members for the anti-Muslim racism that runs right through their party, the case centres on a Facebook page supporting Jacob Rees-Mogg.  Obviously, no criticism of the MP himself is suggested in the report and the twat himself has done nothing except a generic tweet - a counter-factual piece of shit used as a dig at Labour.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, AngryofTuebrook said:

Exhibit A 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47454993 

When the Tories finally pull their fingers out and discipline members for the anti-Muslim racism that runs right through their party, the case centres on a Facebook page supporting Jacob Rees-Mogg.  Obviously, no criticism of the MP himself is suggested in the report and the twat himself has done nothing except a generic tweet - a counter-factual piece of shit used as a dig at Labour.

 

 

 

 

Whereas, note the different tone and angle... 

 

https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/labour-anti-semitism-facebook-groups-corbyn-latest/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...