Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?


Sugar Ape
 Share

Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?  

218 members have voted

  1. 1. Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?



Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, Nelly-Torres said:

I see Tom Bower (the author of the Corbyn gossip book) referred to a left leaning journalist as a "self hating jew" on live TV today. 

 

Surprisingly, I'm yet to hear the Daily Mail/Rachel Riley/Oberman et al's opinion on this? 

To whom was the bellend referring?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Guest said:

Did I say that you said Labour pledged to keep us in?

 

You decided to use the vague “hard Brexit” term which means different things to different people.  It’s why I specifically told you what labours policy was and that people knew exactly what they were voting for which funnily enough is what Corbyn is trying to stick to.

 

You are living in a fantasy land on Brexit.  If Labour got behind a second referendum the tories would call a general election within the hour, be sitting on a fat majority within 6 weeks and doing whatever they wanted for the following 5 years.  I think members setting the policy is a great idea because it’s better than men in suits behind the scenes telling the electorate what they want which conveniently seems benefit the elite every single fucking time after they’ve got in power on some airy fairy manifesto.  The manifesto labour put together last time was fantastic along with the campaign itself.  With these fucking lizards leaving the party and/or being selected I think a win is more likely.

 

You’re one of these people who go on about trashing the worst Tory govt ever but what does that actually mean?  They’ve got a majority with the DUP that are terrified of a socialist govt and they constantly shit themselves before votes and change policy due to Labour.  They’ve also inflicted the biggest defeat on a govt in nearly a century.

 

If we crash out of the EU on a no deal it will be on the tories and you can absolutely guarantee a labour win in the next election as it will be crisis time.

You comfort yourself that Labour are playing a good Brexit game and if we crash they will be in power next election. I think not and an aside to all this , if as the polling shows Remain has a majority can Labour continue to ignore it ? What will you do without men in suits to blame.

I'll admit I don't have all answers but you have an arrogant air of infallibility . In my experience that doesn't work out well , not just for politicians .

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, TK421 said:

Not at freefall speed from a few isolated office fires.  Also, it was announced live on BBC news that WTC7 had collapsed when it was still standing. 

Yep, mental. 

 

Wikileaks, Snowden, Russian hacking and Trump in the WH but not a word, not a single word leaked.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rico1304 said:

Because she's never really been a Labour supporter.

 

She pretends she left because of Labour is rammed with anti-Semites, encouraged by the thoroughly anti-Semitic party leader.  That, of course, is bullshit.

 

What Ruth George has said there is snide, but it's not entirely baseless.  It's known that LFI has close ties to the Israeli Government (and, despite LFI's opacity, the filming from Al Jazeera's The Lobby appears to confirm a financial link).  Now two prominent members of LFI have fucked off to join a grouping which is structured in such a way that it can keep it's funding opaque; a grouping whose main motivation is to damage the leadership of a democratically elected party leader - a motivation which coincides with that of the Israeli Embassy.

 

The important point, though, is to follow the IHRA guidance of not conflating criticism of Israel with anti-Semitism.  Ruth George made an unfounded allegation of potential foreign influence in the Independent Group.  That is not, in any way, anti-Semitic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...