Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?


Sugar Ape
 Share

Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?  

218 members have voted

  1. 1. Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?



Recommended Posts

44 minutes ago, Jairzinho said:

Labour should keep talking about Corbyn. It's fascinating and a winning formula.

 

Or alternatively find shadow ministers who'd answer fhe media question along the lines of..  'after seeing thousands of people die of covid whilst number 10 oversaw a culture of partying, yes he would've been far better for the country than Johnson'... then Reeves answer might not be blasted all over the Yorkshire red wall marginals tonight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Bjornebye said:

x3

 

Things like this just hamper the fight against Anti-Semitism. It's a shame people like Oberman who use the accusation as a weapon/defence mechanism don't realise that. 

 

FRQv2twWQAALCYx?format=jpg&name=small

 

She does, she's not stupid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

"When you know your own truth"

 

Remember when objective reality was a thing? Great days.

 

I'm not sure why we're talking about the Brighton-based Northern Independence Party in the Corbyn thread. Nevertheless, the objective reality is that Proudfoot has blocked a LOT of Jewish people on Twitter.

 

Not for the first time recently, I'm surprised someone has rushed to settle a claim against them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Strontium said:

 

I'm not sure why we're talking about the Brighton-based Northern Independence Party in the Corbyn thread. Nevertheless, the objective reality is that Proudfoot has blocked a LOT of Jewish people on Twitter.

 

Not for the first time recently, I'm surprised someone has rushed to settle a claim against them.

The objective reality - as established in court - is that Proudfoot used a Twitter product to automatically block people who were giving him grief; nobody who was blocked was selected on the grounds of their ethnicity or religion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

The objective reality - as established in court - is that Proudfoot used a Twitter product to automatically block people who were giving him grief; nobody who was blocked was selected on the grounds of their ethnicity or religion.

 

Well, no, that's not the case. A lot of the people blocked had had no interaction with him at all and are only just discovering now that they're blocked by someone they'd never heard of. He blocked everyone who followed a specific account that he claims was harassing him.

 

No idea what the account was, but if I was to use Twitter tools to block everyone who followed (for example) the Official Erasure Twitter account, would it be unreasonable to say that I had an Erasure fan block list?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Strontium said:

 

Well, no, that's not the case. A lot of the people blocked had had no interaction with him at all and are only just discovering now that they're blocked by someone they'd never heard of. He blocked everyone who followed a specific account that he claims was harassing him.

 

No idea what the account was, but if I was to use Twitter tools to block everyone who followed (for example) the Official Erasure Twitter account, would it be unreasonable to say that I had an Erasure fan block list?

The Twitter product blocks accounts linked to those who are giving you grief; blame Twitter for the way it works.

 

In your example, it may well be reasonable (if inaccurate) to say you had an Erasure fan block list; but that's not analogous to what Oberman said. Any Erasure fan list would probably include a lot of gay people; if you blocked those groups and someone said (similar to what Oberman said) that you had an anti-gay block list, you'd be quite right to sue them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...