Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?


Sugar Ape
 Share

Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?  

218 members have voted

  1. 1. Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?



Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

 

There's nothing in either of his tweets about breaking terms and conditions. In his first tweet he's saying companies can deny a platform to whoever they like and that it's not censorship if they remove you. In the second he's saying it shouldn't be up to the whim of companies to remove you. He should make up his mind one way or the other.

Seriously put the black is white arguing morally gymnastic hypocritical Clown on ignore, you won’t regret it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding the alleged (non) hypocrisy from the Novara video bloke, he might not explicitly mention it in his tweets, but I think you can infer from his words in both of the posted tweets that he's talking about two different situations. The first being the faux cries of "censorship" from the far right and fake libertarians whenever they are kicked off a social media network for breaching the terms of use. The second being where a social media network has kicked somebody off their site for no reason, as evidenced by the fact that they quickly realised their error and reinstated the account in question. 

 

It's also worth noting that Novara blokes first tweet is dated 20 June 2020. And that this happened the day before, which may add context to his first tweet and may be further evidence to suggest that he's talking about two entirely different situations, that there's no hypocrisy and that it's another piss poor attempt at a left targeted "gotcha."

 

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2020/jun/19/katie-hopkins-permanently-removed-from-twitter

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Nelly-Torres said:

Regarding the alleged (non) hypocrisy from the Novara video bloke, he might not explicitly mention it in his tweets, but I think you can infer from his words in both of the posted tweets that he's talking about two different situations. The first being the faux cries of "censorship" from the far right and fake libertarians whenever they are kicked off a social media network for breaching the terms of use. The second being where a social media network has kicked somebody off their site for no reason, as evidenced by the fact that they quickly realised their error and reinstated the account in question. 

 

It's also worth noting that Novara blokes first tweet is dated 20 June 2020. And that this happened the day before, which may add context to his first tweet and may be further evidence to suggest that he's talking about two entirely different situations, that there's no hypocrisy and that it's another piss poor attempt at a left targeted "gotcha."

 

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2020/jun/19/katie-hopkins-permanently-removed-from-twitter

I’m just surprised they still give bastani a job.  After his islamaphobia episode in particular.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

 

There's nothing in either of his tweets about breaking terms and conditions. In his first tweet he's saying companies can deny a platform to whoever they like and that it's not censorship if they remove you. In the second he's saying it shouldn't be up to the whim of companies to remove you. He should make up his mind one way or the other.

Right, so your problem isn't any suggestion of hypocrisy, it's that in the 280 characters available to him he left out bits of context that he assumed any halfway intelligent person would understand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nelly-Torres said:

Regarding the alleged (non) hypocrisy from the Novara video bloke, he might not explicitly mention it in his tweets, but I think you can infer from his words in both of the posted tweets that he's talking about two different situations. The first being the faux cries of "censorship" from the far right and fake libertarians whenever they are kicked off a social media network for breaching the terms of use. The second being where a social media network has kicked somebody off their site for no reason, as evidenced by the fact that they quickly realised their error and reinstated the account in question. 

 

It's also worth noting that Novara blokes first tweet is dated 20 June 2020. And that this happened the day before, which may add context to his first tweet and may be further evidence to suggest that he's talking about two entirely different situations, that there's no hypocrisy and that it's another piss poor attempt at a left targeted "gotcha."

 

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2020/jun/19/katie-hopkins-permanently-removed-from-twitter

Sshh. Never let facts get in the way of a good sneer 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Skidfingers McGonical said:

Why do you keep posting stuff that is from 2-3 years ago?

Why not? Hasn't upset you has it?

 

It was to show the ridiculous strategy of a few years ago by those of the Labour right to banish socialists whilst wooing racist cretins like Frances fucking Barbour. A plan which held the promise it would dramatically increase Labour's then disastrous  -5 poll ratings, -5 ratings which would've been a lot more favourable if a large portion of the Labour Party hadn't helped tarnish its then Leader and ratings that are higher than where the Labour Party stands today.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Creator Supreme said:

OK, I'll ask the question, who the fuck are they? Is one of them Lisa Nandy?


Bridget Phillipson, Rachel Reeves, Lisa Nandy.

 

I wouldn’t read much into it, it’s just one pundit’s musings, not even based on latest betting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Neil G said:


Bridget Phillipson, Rachel Reeves, Lisa Nandy.

 

I wouldn’t read much into it, it’s just one pundit’s musings, not even based on latest betting.

According to one or two of the responses on Twitter, that pundit is a Lib Dem with no great record of accurate predictions.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...