Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?

[Jairzinho]

Feeling more united by the day.

[Gnasher]

19 hours ago, Captain Turdseye said:

Marcus Rashford!

 

*gasps*

All jokes aside he helped get the tory ludicrous stance on kids meals overturned. I hope Labour and the whole country get behind him on his new year  campaign to help the poor who have been adversely affected by covid keep their small rise in benefits payments. 

 

 

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/dec/24/marcus-rashford-to-fight-for-permanent-rise-in-universal-credit?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other

[Gnasher]

32 minutes ago, Gnasher said:

All jokes aside he helped get the tory ludicrous stance on kids meals overturned. I hope Labour and the whole country get behind him on his new year  campaign to help the poor who have been adversely affected by covid keep their small rise in benefits payments. 

 

 

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/dec/24/marcus-rashford-to-fight-for-permanent-rise-in-universal-credit?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other

 

 

 

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/jul/31/universal-credit-needs-8bn-overhaul-says-cross-party-report?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other

[Rico1304]

Not a cult 

 

 

[Captain Howdy]

What the fuck is that?

[Numero Veinticinco]

Sheesh. 

[Strontium]

That is incredible.

[Bjornebye]

Jesus wept

[AngryOfTuebrook]

While everyone is criticising Trump, let's not forget who the real villain of the piece is.

 

 

[Bjornebye]

1 minute ago, AngryofTuebrook said:

While everyone is criticising Trump, let's not forget who the real villain of the piece is.

 

 

What a complete and utter cunt. 

[Mudface]

16 minutes ago, AngryofTuebrook said:

While everyone is criticising Trump, let's not forget who the real villain of the piece is.

 

 

That's amazing. Obsessed prick.

[Gnasher]

16 minutes ago, AngryofTuebrook said:

While everyone is criticising Trump, let's not forget who the real villain of the piece is.

 

 

I'd wager a few on here broadly agreeing with Austin there, I'd also wager a few on here broadly agree with most of what he says. 

[Bjornebye]

4 minutes ago, Gnasher said:

I'd wager a few on here broadly agreeing with Austin there, I'd also wager a few on here broadly agree with most of what he says. 

You've got serious issues. 

[AngryOfTuebrook]

57 minutes ago, Gnasher said:

I'd wager a few on here broadly agreeing with Austin there, I'd also wager a few on here broadly agree with most of what he says. 

Easy to prove. Name them and send them a PM asking them to comment on Austin's tweets.

[Gnasher]

16 minutes ago, AngryofTuebrook said:

Easy to prove. Name them and send them a PM asking them to comment on Austin's tweets.

I couldn't be fucking bothered. A section make their dislike and disdain of anyone holding socialist veiws quite plane. They are not that dissimilar to Austin.

[Bjornebye]

26 minutes ago, Gnasher said:

I couldn't be fucking bothered. A section make their dislike and disdain of anyone holding socialist veiws quite plane. They are not that dissimilar to Austin.

People on here are not too dissimilar to Ian Austin???? 

[skend04]

29 minutes ago, Gnasher said:

I couldn't be fucking bothered. A section make their dislike and disdain of anyone holding socialist veiws quite plane. They are not that dissimilar to Austin.

Thinking you're an idiot doesn't make people here a bunch of neocons. 

[Section_31]

43 minutes ago, Gnasher said:

I couldn't be fucking bothered. A section make their dislike and disdain of anyone holding socialist veiws quite plane. They are not that dissimilar to Austin.

You're a cheeky sod. What makes you a socialist? What have you ever done for the Labour party, before, during or after Corbyn? You just talk like someone dropped a Labour Leave pamphlet in a blender and left the lid off.

[Gnasher]

1 minute ago, Section_31 said:

You're a cheeky sod. What makes you a socialist? What have you ever done for the Labour party, before, during or after Corbyn? You just talk like someone dropped a Labour Leave pamphlet in a blender and left the lid off.

Touched a nerve?

[AngryOfTuebrook]

2 hours ago, Section_31 said:

You just talk like someone dropped a Labour Leave pamphlet in a blender and left the lid off.

Excellent turn of phrase.  Again.

[Numero Veinticinco]

2 hours ago, Section_31 said:

You just talk like someone dropped a Labour Leave pamphlet in a blender and left the lid off.

Haha. T-Shirt canon politics. 

 

[Stickman]

5 hours ago, AngryofTuebrook said:

While everyone is criticising Trump, let's not forget who the real villain of the piece is.

 

 

That Lord Austin ?

 

[Rocky Sullivan]

4 hours ago, Gnasher said:

I couldn't be fucking bothered. A section make their dislike and disdain of anyone holding socialist veiws quite plane. They are not that dissimilar to Austin.

Disdain of Corbyn does not always equate to a disdain of socialism.

[Bobby Hundreds]

Ian Austin have an opinion on Thatchers Bezzie Pinochet his torture and murder of thousands. Ignore inconvenient relationships be they political or personal if they don't sit comfortably on the high horse. 

 

I've an extreme view id take anybody with a lordship and catapult them into a volcano.

[Gnasher]

15 minutes ago, Rocky Sullivan said:

Disdain of Corbyn does not always equate to a disdain of socialism.

I never said it was, I wasnt really a hugh fan of Corbyn to be honest, I admired his beliefs but I thought he could come across as a bit surly and impatient in fairly simple interviews. He also showed poor leadership at times, also would have preferred him to step aside when it was obvious Labour was going to get hammered in the election. A good decent man who was unfortunately not quite up to the job.

 

As for the turncoats in his own party? Id like to see them tossed off a cliff.