Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?


Sugar Ape
 Share

Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?  

218 members have voted

  1. 1. Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?



Recommended Posts

The lengths these nobheads go to to try to pin everything on Corbyn. 

 

In these circumstances, there is literally nobody other than the Leader of the Opposition with a credible claim to lead an interim "stop No Deal then call a General Election "Government.  Their hatred of democratic Socialism is clearly greater than their hatred of Brexit  (as their harshest critics have been saying all along).

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jose Jones said:

That is certainly one way to spin it I suppose, although the “being made PM without a general election” line is a bit lame considering well, the current PM was not exactly chosen by a general election.

Also, of course, if a Corbyn-led interim government tried to do literally anything at all other than delay Brexit and call a General Election, they would  (quite rightly) be voted down.

 

For a QC that Maugham one seems very weak on details.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, sir roger said:

Sorry , I am not being lectured by any wanker called Jolyon.

‘Sir Roger’ morning about a posh name, that the bloke had zero choice in.  You lefties are weird.  

 

Oh, and Ed Milliband didn’t mind him when he needed advice on tax reform.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Mook said:

Vulnerable families will suffer regardless of brexit as long as the tories are in power.

They will, but it appears to me to be no better a negotiating stance than the Tories wanting to have no deal on the table in Brussels. It's a give me my own way or I'll go for a path that is clearly not in the national interest. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Barry Wom said:

They will, but it appears to me to be no better a negotiating stance than the Tories wanting to have no deal on the table in Brussels. It's a give me my own way or I'll go for a path that is clearly not in the national interest. 

It’s a bit different though Barry. The tories want no-deal... and Corbyn is asking for help from other parties to stop no-deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Barry Wom said:

They will, but it appears to me to be no better a negotiating stance than the Tories wanting to have no deal on the table in Brussels. It's a give me my own way or I'll go for a path that is clearly not in the national interest. 

I don't see it that way at all.

 

It's the Leader of the Opposition taking a leadership role in opposing the Government's utterly ruinous plans.  It's basically Corbyn doing his job; and SNP, Plaid and the Greens recognise this.  

 

Imagine the grief he'd get if he was just sat on his hands, waiting for Swinson or Ken fucking Clarke to save the day, while the Johnson clique pressed on with this madness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ken Clarke isn't even on the same page, anyway. He wants to renegotiate his own deal with the EU, and then call a general election.

 

So that's a back-bencher picked at random (or apparently just because he's old), installed as PM with no mandate whatsoever, starting Brexit again. It's politics on acid, and all because a few Tories don't like the LOTO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Duff Man said:

So that's a back-bencher picked at random (or apparently just because he's old)

 

You can't say that, he's the Father of the House! And he was a Bilderberger, what better person to help sell the country out? He must have some great contacts to do that with and I'm sure he'll do an excellent job if chosen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...