Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?


Sugar Ape
 Share

Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?  

218 members have voted

  1. 1. Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?



Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Revenge negging cunt said:

Pathetic again today 

I take it you're sulking because he was out campaigning to defeat the Tories, rather than jumping on the centrists bandwagon du jour?

 

Labour Party policy is still to respect the outcome of the Referendum, but to oppose any Brexit proposals that fail to meet their Six Tests.  While a second referendum is an option, it's not something that Labour should be leading the charge for or pinning their hopes on; fringe parties can do that as much as they like, but a party that intends to form the next Government needs to try to bring the country back together, not alienate half of it.

 

https://labour.org.uk/press/jeremy-corbyn-brexit-speech-wakefield/

 

Any political leader who wants to bring the country together cannot wish away the votes of 17 million people who wanted to leave, any more than they can ignore the concerns of the 16 million who voted to remain.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Black candidate Martha Osamor had the most nominations, with Hoey only having one, but the National Executive Committee declined to shortlist Osamor and imposed a shortlist on the constituency party. When the local party refused to choose from the shortlist, Hoey was imposed by the NEC as the Labour candidate.

 

Amazing how they the Labour right are whining desperately for it to be a 'broad church ' now they aren't in command. Cunts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, sir roger said:

Black candidate Martha Osamor had the most nominations, with Hoey only having one, but the National Executive Committee declined to shortlist Osamor and imposed a shortlist on the constituency party. When the local party refused to choose from the shortlist, Hoey was imposed by the NEC as the Labour candidate.

 

Amazing how they the Labour right are whining desperately for it to be a 'broad church ' now they aren't in command. Cunts.

Maybe they were worried what Martha would be like with expenses...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sir roger said:

I'm not sure why , she has served in the Lords with distinction and I am not aware of any irregularities relating to her political life.

Such high praise after what, a year? 

 

I think her her time on the council was tarred with financial irregularities.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, viRdjil said:

JLM sounds very unhappy about this.

 

 

I fucking hate the way those cunts - from an organisation which, unlike Jewish Voice for Labour,  doesn't require members to be either Jewish or Labour members - claim to represent "the Jewish community" as if Jackie fucking Walker isn't Jewish!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is our liberty for if not to post for ourselves?

Like all of you I have wrestled with my conscience about what to do?

I could tear these rico and strontium posts down and bulldoze them into the river. 

These fools and knaves and cowards are posting on things they don’t even understand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Strontium Dog said:

 

Her supporters are taking it well:

 

D2rx-MuW0AE54hT.jpg

Any evidence that that anti-Semitic prick is one of "her supporters" and not, y'know, just an anti-Semitic prick?

 

His Twitter account has been suspended, but from various screenshots and comments, he appears to be just a gobby anti-Semite - possibly American - and to have absolutely fuck all to do with UK politics or Socialism in any form.  Of course, I could be wrong.  If you've got evidence, please share.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, AngryofTuebrook said:

Did you just conflate two black women, on the same page that you conflated two Jewish women?

 

I'm not a fan of the phrase "that's not a good look", but y'know what..?

Ha ha ha is this what gaslighting looks like?  Ha ha ha. I mixed up the reports into two victims of anti semitism so therefore I must be racist. Fucking hell. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, AngryofTuebrook said:

Did you just conflate two black women, on the same page that you conflated two Jewish women?

 

I'm not a fan of the phrase "that's not a good look", but y'know what..?

Cunt behaviour. Somehow I expected better of you but what a cuntish thing to do.  

 

Tell you what report me to Dave you fucking whopper.  

 

“Back in March 1990, Haringey Labour Party voted, by 26 to 10, to deselect Martha Osamor, the hard-Left former deputy leader of the much-troubled local authority.

Ms Osamor would be barred from standing again as a Labour councillor in the borough. The deselection came after what Haringey Labour officials had called ‘unsatisfactory answers’ she had given to a financial probe.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, AngryofTuebrook said:

Any evidence that that anti-Semitic prick is one of "her supporters" and not, y'know, just an anti-Semitic prick?

 

He's posting in support of her. Hence, one of her supporters. 

 

Anyone else who negs me for highlighting racism will get one back too. I won't be bullied into silence.

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Strontium Dog said:

 

He's posting in support of her. Hence, one of her supporters. 

 

Anyone else who negs me for highlighting racism will get one back too. I won't be bullied into silence.

So, you don't have any evidence other than that one post?

Like I say, from the wee bit of research I did (which appears to be more than you have done) it looks like he's just an ignorant anti-Semitic prick, who probably doesn't even know that Walker is Jewish, but just wants to shout about his hatred of Jews.

 

Nobody is going to neg anyone for highlighting racism; but if you make snide insinuations to try to smear the left wing of the Labour Party as racist with no real evidence, then you're going to get negged.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...