Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?

[Strontium]

1 minute ago, moof said:

Yes, that is exactly what you do every time you parrot far right propaganda. Perhaps unwittingly, if I’m being charitable. 

 

You're so full of shit it's untrue. Not once have I ever parroted any propaganda, far-right or otherwise.

[aRdja]

23 minutes ago, Strontium Dog said:

 

She didn't actually say he was an antisemite, just another misquote/lie from the Don't Read So Gud brigade.

I’d be quite happy to call a person who promotes anti-semitism, an anti-semite.

[moof]

6 minutes ago, Strontium Dog said:

 

You're so full of shit it's untrue. Not once have I ever parroted any propaganda, far-right or otherwise.

You realise the people who read your posts have a functioning memory? 

[Rico1304]

32 minutes ago, Strontium Dog said:

 

Legitimising and enabling fascism?

 

You are a clown, pure and simple.

Repped for bringing Hearsay into the argument. 

[Rico1304]

11 minutes ago, Strontium Dog said:

 

You're so full of shit it's untrue. Not once have I ever parroted any propaganda, far-right or otherwise.

So she’s far-right now?  Maybe Countdown has radicalised her?  Wasn’t like that in Richard Whitely’s day.  

 

Or was it Strictly?  Darcy Bussell rocking an SS tattoo.  

[Strontium]

8 minutes ago, aRdja said:

I’d be quite happy to call a person who promotes anti-semitism, an anti-semite.

 

I wouldn't. There are lots of ways a person could enable something without actively supporting and believing it.

 

But since you're not Jewish, you don't get to define what antisemitism is anyway, so the point is moot.

[Strontium]

8 minutes ago, moof said:

You realise the people who read your posts have a functioning memory? 

 

I certainly hope so.

 

Funny how your memory never stretches to specific examples, isn't it. Almost like it was a baseless smear or something.

[Strontium]

4 minutes ago, rico1304 said:

So she’s far-right now?  Maybe Countdown has radicalised her?  Wasn’t like that in Richard Whitely’s day.  

 

After all, Countdown is watched by middle class intellectuals, just join the dots.

[aRdja]

6 minutes ago, Strontium Dog said:

 

I wouldn't. There are lots of ways a person could enable something without actively supporting and believing it.

 

But since you're not Jewish, you don't get to define what antisemitism is anyway, so the point is moot.

Lucky there is a definition out there with examples right?

 

Please keep it civil Strontium.

[Strontium]

Just now, aRdja said:

Lucky there is a definition out there with examples right?

 

Please keep it civil Strontium.

 

What wasn't civil about my response?!

 

Given the sly little comments you've been making all day, I think my response was actually remarkably civil.

[Nelly-Szoboszlai]

What Riley means is that Chomsky is a critic of Israeli war crimes, apartheid and the bastardisation of Zionism as well as being an advocate of Palestinian rights. 

 

She's perpetuating the same tired, old bare faced lie that anybody who holds such views has an underlying motivation - antisemitism - and she's desperately trying to squeeze advocating Palestinian rights into the same box as encouraging antisemitism. 

 

She's quite close to making the collective comparison as per the unfit for purpose IHRA definition of Israel = jews. 

 

She's really adding very little to the discussion. 

[cloggypop]

8 minutes ago, Strontium Dog said:

 

After all, Countdown is watched by middle class intellectuals, just join the dots.

The studio audience is at least 80% Brexit. Reminds me of Questiontime. 

[aRdja]

14 minutes ago, Strontium Dog said:

 

What wasn't civil about my response?!

 

Given the sly little comments you've been making all day, I think my response was actually remarkably civil.

It was a “know your place” comment, which is uncalled for.

[Strontium]

3 minutes ago, aRdja said:

It was a “know your place” comment, which is uncalled for.

 

No, it was very much called for. Jews are rightly sick of goysplaining.

[aRdja]

52 minutes ago, Strontium Dog said:

 

No, it was very much called for. Jews are rightly sick of goysplaining.

If someone called my nephew a kike I’d knock his head in, regardless of what you think mate.

[Numero Veinticinco]

1 minute ago, aRdja said:

If someone called my nephew a kike I’d knock his head in

Harsh on your nephew, that. 

[Rico1304]

52 minutes ago, aRdja said:

If someone called my nephew a kike I’d knock his head in, regardless of what you think mate.

I think this is where someone comes in and says ‘some of my best friends are black’. 

[aRdja]

9 minutes ago, rico1304 said:

I think this is where someone comes in and says ‘some of my best friends are black’. 

Two non Jews tell another non jew he’s not allowed to call out an anti-semitic act if he sees one... I’ve seen it all now. Didn’t agree with it at the time but Moof might have made a good point earlier, in hindsight. 

[Rico1304]

2 minutes ago, aRdja said:

Two non Jews tell another non jew he’s not allowed to call out an anti-semitic act if he sees one... I’ve seen it all now.

When did you see that? Are you seeing things again? I certainly didn’t say it and SD is Jewish.  Keep up kid! 

[aRdja]

2 minutes ago, rico1304 said:

When did you see that? Are you seeing things again? I certainly didn’t say it and SD is Jewish.  Keep up kid! 

Err that was the whole discussion Rico? SD said just a couple of posts back only jews are allowed call out anti-semites. Also you don’t need to be patronising, calling me “kid”. It’s not a good look.

[Rico1304]

1 minute ago, aRdja said:

Err that was the whole discussion Rico? SD said just a couple of posts back only jews are allowed call out anti-semites. Also you don’t need to be patronising, calling me “kid”. It’s not a good look.

I didn’t say it though did I? And I don’t think he said that either.  

 

Ha, sorry love.  

[skend04]

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/jan/07/labour-backs-cross-party-amendment-to-block-no-deal-brexit

 

When the majority of the Labour party decided to vote for Art.50 you guaranteed that No Deal was the most likely outcome because that's the only thing Art 50 guarantees.

 

The Tory and Labour party is  chock top to bottom with absolute fucking imbeciles.

[AngryOfTuebrook]

24 minutes ago, skend04 said:

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/jan/07/labour-backs-cross-party-amendment-to-block-no-deal-brexit

 

When the majority of the Labour party decided to vote for Art.50 you guaranteed that No Deal was the most likely outcome because that's the only thing Art 50 guarantees.

 

The Tory and Labour party is  chock top to bottom with absolute fucking imbeciles.

Article 50 does not "guarantee" a No Deal Brexit. It doesn't even guarantee Brexit. It is unilaterally revocable. 

 

"Let us not talk falsely, now; the hour's getting late."

[Rico1304]

2 minutes ago, AngryofTuebrook said:

Article 50 does not "guarantee" a No Deal Brexit. It doesn't even guarantee Brexit. It is unilaterally revocable. 

 

"Let us not talk falsely, now; the hour's getting late."

Did we know that at the time? 

[SasaS]

3 hours ago, Strontium Dog said:

 

No, it was very much called for. Jews are rightly sick of goysplaining.

Repped for goysplaining. The TLW premiere.