Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?

[ZonkoVille77]

9 minutes ago, Strontium Dog said:

 

It seems that some of the signatures are genuine, but the signatories were misled about the contents of the letter.

Either way, it's hardly a shining moment.

So you've peddled a falsehood and won't backtrack honestly. 

Then you demand people to respect you and your opinions.... 

You are Trumpian in your dishonesty.

[Strontium]

35 minutes ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

You could just say you got it wrong and it wasn’t a forgery. It would be much more honest of you. 

Er, if I sign something, but I've been duped into signing something completely different, then that's fraud. But you want me to say I got it wrong, because it's one type of fraud and not another? Hahaha.

[Numero Veinticinco]

25 minutes ago, Strontium Dog said:

Er, if I sign something, but I've been duped into signing something completely different, then that's fraud. But you want me to say I got it wrong, because it's one type of fraud and not another? Hahaha.

No. I’d like you to admit that you called it a forgery and it wasn’t a forgery. It’s pretty simple. 

[Strontium]

I'm happy to clarify that, in the event that the uncorroborated story published by serial liars Skwakbox holds any truth, the letter is only a partial forgery.

[aRdja]

https://jewishnews.timesofisrael.com/confusion-over-pro-corbyn-letter-from-strictly-orthodox-rabbis/

“It appears, however, that the letter may well be authentic and the row over its appearance is part of an ongoing “turf war” within Stamford Hill as to who has overall authority in the community. One insider, who asked not to be named, said the rabbis probably had signed but that they had not done so officially.”

People are really throwing everything they’ve got to discredit Corbyn. From fake, to misled, to real but not official now.

[AngryOfTuebrook]

6 hours ago, Strontium Dog said:

I'm happy to clarify that, in the event that the uncorroborated story published by serial liars Skwakbox holds any truth, the letter is only a partial forgery.

"Serial liars".

 

Another claim that requires some corroboration. 

[Strontium]

52 minutes ago, AngryofTuebrook said:

"Serial liars".

 

Another claim that requires some corroboration. 

If you genuinely don't remember them claiming there was a government d-notice over the true Grenfell death toll, or any of the numerous other times they have spread fake news, a Google search for Skwawkbox lies will educate you.

[Numero Veinticinco]

7 hours ago, Strontium Dog said:

I'm happy to clarify that, in the event that the uncorroborated story published by serial liars Skwakbox holds any truth, the letter is only a partial forgery.

You know, I'm trying to remain civil with you, but I find it very difficult when you are so dishonest and uncouth. The virtues you bestow upon yourself are seldom seen in your actions. It is not, by any sensible definition of the word, a 'forged document about Jews'. You might want to take the uncorroborated word of known propagandist liars from the JC regarding 'some' unnamed Rabbis claiming to have been 'misled', that's up to you. You parroted lies and you got caught out, despite claiming repeatedly that you only every base your opinions on facts, but you don't have the decency to actually say you got it wrong and apologise. Oh, and the revenge negging and the self-repping that you have done previously, it shows you up quite badly. I'd suggest taking a step back and thinking about how you act. 

[Strontium]

I'll defend truth until my dying breath. I haven't got anything wrong so I have nothing to apologise for. If any sources I quote have it wrong, that's not my fault.

[Numero Veinticinco]

2 minutes ago, Strontium Dog said:

I'll defend truth until my dying breath. I haven't got anything wrong so I have nothing to apologise for. If any sources I quote have it wrong, that's not my fault.

What a brazen liar. 

[Strontium]

1 minute ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

What a brazen liar. 

Fuck off you shameless troll.

[Numero Veinticinco]

I'll certainly not fuck off, I'll keep picking up on your dishonesty and refuting your self-adulation. 

[Hand Shandy]

You should stand for election again Stronts - age appears to have improved your ability to deflect and bullshit significantly.

[Strontium]

2 minutes ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

I'll certainly not fuck off, I'll keep picking up on your dishonesty and refuting your self-adulation. 

There's no dishonesty. I use the best information available to support my posts. If the information has changed, I will change my position. Because that's honest. Sorry you find these self-evident facts difficult to deal with.

[AngryOfTuebrook]

16 minutes ago, Strontium Dog said:

I'll defend truth until my dying breath. I haven't got anything wrong so I have nothing to apologise for. If any sources I quote have it wrong, that's not my fault.

Are you happy to cut The Skwawkbox the same slack?

[AngryOfTuebrook]

53 minutes ago, Strontium Dog said:

If you genuinely don't remember them claiming there was a government d-notice over the true Grenfell death toll, or any of the numerous other times they have spread fake news, a Google search for Skwawkbox lies will educate you.

Just Googed that.

 

I got the Di Notice thing and one other instance of Skwakbox publishing a retraction or a correction to a story which turned out to be incorrect.

 

Then I got Guido fucking Fawkes using that as the basis to dismiss everything Skwakbox publishes, because it's clearly all fake news.

[Strontium]

12 minutes ago, AngryofTuebrook said:

Are you happy to cut The Skwawkbox the same slack?

I'll always take reputation into consideration when assessing claims and counter claims. But if they publish something that turns out to be true, why would I not acknowledge that? I'll never knowingly post something untrue.

[AngryOfTuebrook]

2 minutes ago, Strontium Dog said:

I'll always take reputation into consideration when assessing claims and counter claims. But if they publish something that turns out to be true, why would I not acknowledge that? I'll never knowingly post something untrue.

There's no realistic suggestion that they do.

Meanwhile, you keep parroting Guido Fawkes...

[Jenson]

The "institutionally racist" Labour Party

[Numero Veinticinco]

Agree. Where's all the white men? CUNTS.

[skend04]

Even Nick had to change his surname to Brown to get in.

[Strontium]

How does a photo of lots of non-Jews disprove the notion that an organisation is institutionally racist against Jews. Weird.

[aRdja]

Double page spread on one of their weekly papers. 

I hope this is the end of this particular saga now.

 

[Numero Veinticinco]

5 minutes ago, aRdja said:

Double spread on one of their weekly papers. 

I hope this is the end of this particular saga now.

 

So not necessarily a 'forged document about Jews' or even a 'partially forged' document? Interesting. I'm looking forward to hearing more about it so I can both slam Labour and pretend I defend the truth. 

[Strontium]

As someone who doesn't lie, I am happy to accept these brand new facts as evidence that the letter is probably genuine. Because that is the honest thing to do.