Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?


Sugar Ape
 Share

Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?  

218 members have voted

  1. 1. Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?



Recommended Posts

I view Blair's and Brown's governments in much the same way as Obama's government. Governments that carried immense hope for significant change but which, ultimately, failed to deliver that and didn't much alter the status quo.

Couldn’t agree more - the most significant change was the size of Blair and Mandy’s ban accounts. Much of the popular cynicism and disenchantment with politics can be traced back to Blair and his cronies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some right cunts are barristers.

 

 

I had to explain to one that a leasehold property wasn't the same thing as a freehold property let under an assured shorthand tenancy.  Because she asked me from her mobile, when she was on the train on the way to the court hearing.

 

Oh how we laughed in the office.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The next bit is where he says "wipe out" doesn't equate to banning, like a total cunt.

Just because I love being an irritating, pedantic cunt, I'll say it: wishing for a world in which people don't feel the need to believe in the supernatural isn't the same as wanting to ban religion.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That exact same background was used with Gavin Williamson a couple of weeks ago.

What was the story on that occasion?

 

If they were revelling in snide, baseless innuendo about Williamson being a Kremlin stooge, then they were out of order. If they were reporting on, ooh, let's say, a story involving UK defence policy in respect of Russia, then it would be appropriate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What was the story on that occasion?

 

If they were revelling in snide, baseless innuendo about Williamson being a Kremlin stooge, then they were out of order. If they were reporting on, ooh, let's say, a story involving UK defence policy in respect of Russia, then it would be appropriate.

Oh come on FFS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What was the story on that occasion?

If they were revelling in snide, baseless innuendo about Williamson being a Kremlin stooge, then they were out of order. If they were reporting on, ooh, let's say, a story involving UK defence policy in respect of Russia, then it would be appropriate.

It was a story involving Russia, so had a backdrop showing Russia. Who’d have thought it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...