Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Declaring war on Rodgers


Gym Beglin
 Share

Recommended Posts

The war on Rodgers would be over with one battle if fans were actually serious about getting rid of him.

 

It's very simple. At the next home game, Anfield needs to be empty of home fans.

 

The most effective vote of no confidence is a vote 'with the feet'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The war on Rodgers would be over with one battle if fans were actually serious about getting rid of him.

 

It's very simple. At the next home game, Anfield needs to be empty of home fans.

 

The most effective vote of no confidence is a vote 'with the feet'

 

Its sad but that is the only way the Americans would notice.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its the failure to get the ball to any of them quick enough that is the problem.

 

No its that theres no one to run beyond. In the past cout could look up and see suarez sterling and or sturridge, now he looks up and theres nothing but benteke who is playing with his back to goal so realistically its hit a worldie or come back. Theres no pace the other team have got tea and are breaking out the digestives by the time we realise theres no one out wide anyway, we cant stretch teams with no pace no wingers or movement.

I havent seen anyone point out this simple fact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those last 15 league games (plus the Villa shambles at Wembley) are at least as bad as what Hodgson served up. And the shite he comes out with every week is challenging Hodgson for sheer foot-in-mouth fuckwittery.

 

It's not even an aberrant one block of 15 games either. September till December last year (the Villa home game through to the Basle CL exit) was also as bad anything Hodgson served up. Ricky Lambert up front on his own in a must win CL game at Anfield! Those 0-0 draws against dross at Anfield with Ricky Lambert up front on his own. Those 6 CL performances. Playing the reserves in Madrid. That Newcastle away game. Getting turned over by Neil Warnock's Palace.

 

He survived one dreadful few months and then did it again. Teflon Hodgers.

Hodgson had the benefit of Carra, Stevie, Reina, Agger. Torres, Mashcarano all close to their prime, if Rodgers had them players now he would pick them, plus ,Hodgson was a cunt.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hodgson had the benefit of Carra, Stevie, Reina, Agger. Torres, Mashcarano all close to their prime, if Rodgers had them players now he would pick them, plus ,Hodgson was a cunt.

Agree with that, but Rodgers had the better part of 300 million quid to replace those players with. He also had Suarez, Sturridge (for a limited time), and 2 and a half seasons more than Hodgson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hodgson had the benefit of Carra, Stevie, Reina, Agger. Torres, Mashcarano all close to their prime, if Rodgers had them players now he would pick them, plus ,Hodgson was a cunt.

This Hodgson vs Rodgers debate is akin to choosing between Ebola or the Black Death. You really wouldn't want either if you had the choice and if you had to choose you'd spoil the ballot paper by smearing your faeces on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think people are getting carried away with the 300m line about Rodgers.  People need to realise that it is a lot more, people say 20m for Lovren, but his contract must be worth about 12m on top of that plus any signing on fees and agents fee.  Potentially that transfer cost 32m.

 

Work that out for all the shit he has signed and he has royally stitched us up for years to come.  It will take 4 years to flush the turd that is his legacy.  Whoever comes in will have their hands tied thanks to the pisspoor spending of Rodgers and that bastard committee

 

 

 

  • Upvote 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think people are getting carried away with the 300m line about Rodgers.  People need to realise that it is a lot more, people say 20m for Lovren, but his contract must be worth about 12m on top of that plus any signing on fees and agents fee.  Potentially that transfer cost 32m.

 

Work that out for all the shit he has signed and he has royally stitched us up for years to come.  It will take 4 years to flush the turd that is his legacy.  Whoever comes in will have their hands tied thanks to the pisspoor spending of Rodgers and that bastard committee

 

The same squad (but with worse strikers) finished just 9 points short of fourth last year.  Now that we have Benteke, Firmino and Ings instead of last season's nonsense any half-decent manager who replaces Rodgers should easily be able to get the 3 additional wins required to finish in the top four.   That's what I'm expecting to happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The same squad (but with worse strikers) finished just 9 points short of fourth last year.  Now that we have Benteke, Firmino and Ings instead of last season's nonsense any half-decent manager who replaces Rodgers should easily be able to get the 3 additional wins required to finish in the top four.   That's what I'm expecting to happen.

 

Would be true only if the teams above us didn't strengthen at all. Reality is the team ahead of us got in Depay, Martial, Schneiderlin, Darmian, Schweinsteiger which on early signs, even if hardly exceptional, still represent a better transfer window than the one we had. Not to mention that they managed to keep all the players they wanted to unlike us with Sterling. I won't even bring City's reinforcements into the discussion. So, if anything, by your flawed logic, an incoming manager would potentially even have more than the 9 points to make up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...