Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Should the UK remain a member of the EU


Anny Road
 Share

  

317 members have voted

  1. 1. Should the UK remain a member of the EU

    • Yes
      259
    • No
      58


Recommended Posts

All the other EU members have a nationalised railway. It's a particularly shit example to pick out for your argument but a great one to show the UK being the main driving political force behind European neoliberalism.

Not all, and that's part of the reason the eu wants to open up European railways to privatisation, they see the money to be made and endorse our fucked up model.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All the other EU members have a nationalised railway. It's a particularly shit example to pick out for your argument but a great one to show the UK being the main driving political force behind European neoliberalism.

"The EU is clear that its objective is “Opening up national freight and passenger markets to cross-border competition”."

It is what it is and not what eu think it is.

http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2015/08/renationalise-railways-what-no-one-will-tell-you-we-cant-while-were-eu

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"ty. Countries including Sweden, Germany, the Netherlands and Denmark have made radical reforms to the way in which both passenger and freight services are provided. In the case of regional passenger services, these changes are, in most cases, based upon strong devolved government, to mainly regional bodies (see TSSA Journal March 2012). However, inter-city and freight have not been immune from radical changes either. Some of the impetus for reform has come from the European Union, through a series of ‘rail packages’ which have liberalised the market for both international passenger and freight services. A ‘fourth rail package’ is currently being debated by the European Parliament and if adopted will take ‘liberalisation’ of rail operations much further. Labour’s rail spokesperson Lilian Greenwood has strongly opposed its proposals for compulsory competitive tendering of ‘domestic’ rail passenger services. She told TSSA Journal: “No-one should doubt that this is an ideologically driven agenda. Even the European Commission concedes that the evidence for imposing rail privatisation is ‘ambiguous’ and describes compulsory tendering as a ‘political choice’.”"

"However, a political momentum developed within the EU which was part of a wider neo-liberal approach aimed at encouraging ‘competition’ and, by implication, privatisation. The first stage of this process was in the opening up of international services to competition. If passed, the current ‘fourth package’ proposals will see all rail services, passenger and freight, being opened up to compulsory competitive tender. The effect will be to seriously limit any attempt to develop a publicly owned and accountable railway, whether in the UK under a future Labour government, or elsewhere in Europe."

https://www.tssa.org.uk/en/whats-new/news/index.cfm/rail-across-europe-public-private-and-beyond

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The eu is sorry it hasn't managed to privatise it all yet but it's working in it as it's fourth package proposals for the 'liberalisation' of eu rail markets demonstrates.

That's the agenda and it always was. I'm sorry to have to break it to you like this maybe we can still be freinds?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After ww2 this was it's British raj if you like as any conquering army leaves it's stay behind device to maintain control. It's best if you keep that subject away from the occupied people's. Proof?

How much trading does the eu do with its powerhouse neighbour russia and is it free to do so as it pleases?

Why should the eu be sanctioning russia but trading with the saudi's Bahrain etc?

Why is it basically owned by gSachs and jp Morgan?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well basically yes I agree with her there and reading in that article trumps position, you seem to be in the same page as Donald. Funny world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The Fourth Railway Package aims to make competitive tendering of rail passenger services mandatory across Europe – pushing Member States to privatise their railways. The package will also enforce the separation of train operations from infrastructure management – which has led to fragmentation, inefficiency and extra costs in the UK."

http://actionforrail.org/the-future-of-rail-in-europe-briefing-in-the-european-parliament/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...