Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Should the UK remain a member of the EU


Anny Road
 Share

  

317 members have voted

  1. 1. Should the UK remain a member of the EU

    • Yes
      259
    • No
      58


Recommended Posts

He knows exactly what he's doing, and what the deal said. Get ready for a whole lot more of it, too. Between now and the end of the year the nuttier element of the party are going to start talking up no-deal again; their equivalents in the press will do the same, and it's probably what will happen, because it's good for them and their mates, and more importantly consolidates the Tories' status as the one true party of Brexit.

 

This is the logical conclusion of the politics of flag-fucking, folks. At some point you have to deliver on the xenophobia and lies, or the fash start eating into your vote. Excited for Progressive Patriotism under Labour, though. I'm sure that will be the counter-weight the country so desperately needs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Nummer Neunzehn said:

So, basically, when you signed it and voted for it, you hadn't fucking read it. 

 

Classic Brexiteer bollocks.  

Not only that, but the cunt also voted to limit the scrutiny time given to the WA - so no other fucker could read it properly either, and supported the Govt when they kicked out those who told them this was wrong 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gnasher said:

Thought according to a few on here our beloved eu do not interfere in the business of single countries like Spain with Catalonia? 

 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/aug/17/eu-calls-leaders-to-emergency-summit-to-support-belarus-people

 

Angry won't be happy.

Hypocrisy 

 

https://www.theparliamentmagazine.eu/news/article/eu-can-no-longer-ignore-catalonia-says-puigdemont

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Gnasher said:

Thought according to a few on here our beloved eu do not interfere in the business of single countries like Spain with Catalonia? 

 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/aug/17/eu-calls-leaders-to-emergency-summit-to-support-belarus-people

 

Angry won't be happy.

The EU don't generally interfere in domestic matters of Member States. 

 

You're having a mare her, Gnash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gnasher said:

Seems the eu are only interested in defending the old east European countries close to Russia with a large young male workforce.  The people who voted in Catalonia can go fuck themselves.

 

I wonder why?

I reckon it's because the whole Catalonia issue is/was regarded as an internal matter for a member State whereas the Belarus situation is, hopefully, the last gasp of the last European dictator of a non member State

What do you think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mattyq said:

I reckon it's because the whole Catalonia issue is/was regarded as an internal matter for a member State whereas the Belarus situation is, hopefully, the last gasp of the last European dictator of a non member State

What do you think?

 

But it's not "the last gasp" of a European dictatorship, as you put it. 

 

Also the Catalonia issue which saw pensioners beaten with sticks at a ballot box was glossed over, Catalonia would not be an internal matter if democracy was followed. 

 

The Catalonia peoples won a vote, no interference,. The Belarus election which was won by the government seems to require EU intervention. 

 

Stinks to high heaven. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can criticise the EU's lack of action when a Member State government does something twatty.

 

You can (if you want) criticise the EU for taking action when the government of a non-Member State does something twatty.

 

What you can't honestly do is accuse the EU of hypocrisy for responding differently to different situations. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Gnasher said:

 

But it's not "the last gasp" of a European dictatorship, as you put it. 

 

Also the Catalonia issue which saw pensioners beaten with sticks at a ballot box was glossed over, Catalonia would not be an internal matter if democracy was followed. 

 

The Catalonia peoples won a vote, no interference,. The Belarus election which was won by the government seems to require EU intervention. 

 

Stinks to high heaven. 

Mate, I'm not defending what the Spanish Govt. did because it was shit

The Catalan vote was illegal under Spanish law

The Spanish Govt. is elected fair & square

The Belarus election was, by all accounts, heavily rigged as it has been for the last 20 years.

The President is, by all accounts again, a very nasty dictator in the old school Soviet style

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 09/10/2017 at 21:59, AngryofTuebrook said:

I've not looked into it too much, but it looks like they played it with a straight bat.  

Statement By The European Commission On Catalonia

"Brussels, 2 October 2017

Under the Spanish Constitution, yesterday's vote in Catalonia was not legal.

For the European Commission, as President Juncker has reiterated repeatedly, this is an internal matter for Spain that has to be dealt with in line with the constitutional order of Spain.

We also reiterate the legal position held by this Commission as well as by its predecessors. If a referendum were to be organised in line with the Spanish Constitution it would mean that the territory leaving would find itself outside of the European Union.

Beyond the purely legal aspects of this matter, the Commission believes that these are times for unity and stability, not divisiveness and fragmentation.

We call on all relevant players to now move very swiftly from confrontation to dialogue. Violence can never be an instrument in politics. We trust the leadership of Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy to manage this difficult process in full respect of the Spanish Constitution and of the fundamental rights of citizens enshrined therein."

 

I'm not sure what else they could have done, without overstepping a mark in terms of meddling in a Member State's internal affairs.

 

The recent outburst of violence and repression in Catalonia came from Madrid, not Brussels.

Er ok.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...