Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Should the UK remain a member of the EU


Anny Road
 Share

  

317 members have voted

  1. 1. Should the UK remain a member of the EU

    • Yes
      259
    • No
      58


Recommended Posts

34 minutes ago, Captain Howdy said:

Nothing class about any of it, the whole house is rammed with disingenuous, lying, self serving turds.

A lot of them are there to enrich themselves by impoverishing millions.

 

Some of them are there to do the right thing. 

 

The days of "they're all the same" (if that were ever really true) are over.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bjornebye said:

Clarke hammering Johnson. If their is a general election, against all odds he could help Labours turn-out. Not by backing Corbyn but by tories wanting Johnson out on the back of Clarkes damning comments. 

Reminded me of when Geoffrey Howe crucified Thatcher with his cricket metaphor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Boss said:

The right thing is not doing everything in your power to stop the result of a democratic vote being implemented. The right thing is putting it to the people. Let the people decide what they want. No deal or a Jeremy Corbyn government. 

Odd suggestion.

Why advocate asking a different question now to the one that was asked 3 years ago via a general election rather than another referendum? You must know that's nonsense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moo said:

Odd suggestion.

Why advocate asking a different question now to the one that was asked 3 years ago via a general election rather than another referendum? You must know that's nonsense. 

 

Another referendum would declare the same result.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Boss said:

Why? Surely the public should make that decision.

Because to go for a GE without first passing that legislation leaves the probability of the UK falling out of the EU by default, during the election campaign period, with the public having no say in the decision. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AngryofTuebrook said:

Because to go for a GE without first passing that legislation leaves the probability of the UK falling out of the EU by default, during the election campaign period, with the public having no say in the decision. 

Not if the election is scheduled before the deadline. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MegadriveMan said:

Do you really Trust Boris Johnson to actually allow that to happen? I don't.

 

The public will be giving Boris a mandate for no deal if he wins a majority in the next GE. If Corbyn wins a majority the public would be giving him a mandate to reverse Brexit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Boss said:

Not if the election is scheduled before the deadline. 

The sitting PM  - who, in this case,  is a lifelong liar and clearly horny for No Deal (and not a fan of democracy) - is allowed to unilaterally change the date of the election after Parliament closes. So, he can tell Parliament that the election will be before 31st October and then change the date until afterwards, thereby depriving the people of any say in how we leave the EU. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, AngryofTuebrook said:

The sitting PM  - who, in this case,  is a lifelong liar and clearly horny for No Deal (and not a fan of democracy) - is allowed to unilaterally change the date of the election after Parliament closes. So, he can tell Parliament that the election will be before 31st October and then change the date until afterwards, thereby depriving the people of any say in how we leave the EU. 

Well schedule a snap election before parliament closes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Boss said:

 

The public will be giving Boris a mandate for no deal if he wins a majority in the next GE. If Corbyn wins a majority the public would be giving him a mandate to reverse Brexit. 

You're missing the point.  If he had won the vote tonight and had called an early election, he wouldn't have needed a mandate. He would have dissolved Parliament and then deferred the election until after the UK had crashed out with No Deal.  The public wouldn't get a say until it was too late. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...