Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Should the UK remain a member of the EU


Anny Road
 Share

  

317 members have voted

  1. 1. Should the UK remain a member of the EU

    • Yes
      259
    • No
      58


Recommended Posts

New batch of notices released by the government on the no deal scenario. A bit of a pisser as I think a lot of companies will now shift their registrations to the EU and McDonell will find his share for worker scheme might be dead before it had a chance to fly. Just like flights after March 2019.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Scooby Dudek said:

To quote from the wiki link you provided;

 

She served in David Cameron's Cabinet, first as the Minister without portfoliobetween 2010–12, then as the Minister of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Office and as the Minister of State for Faith and Communities (styled as "Senior Minister of State"), until her resignation citing her disagreement with the Government's policy on the Israel–Gaza conflict in August 2014.[1]

 

 

 

So despite never being elected, she served in the British Governments cabinet as a Minister of State. 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes thanks, as I said never once elected,, unlike your presumption of the stupid Tory cunt being elected.

 

So we now agree baroness cunt chops washi has never been endorsed by the British electorate but seems (In your and Kinnock cunts eyes) to be a suitable Eu president!!

S

 

 

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Gnasher said:

Yes thanks, as I said never once elected,, unlike your presumption of the stupid Tory cunt being elected.

 

So we now agree baroness cunt chops washi has never been endorsed by the British electorate but seems (In your and Kinnock cunts eyes) to be a suitable Eu president!!

S

 

 

Obviously crossed wires.

 

I knew the stupid Tory cunt had never been elected.

My presumption was you were implying it was wrong that once again, unelected, unaccountable EU cunts were able to make policy decisions about the U.K.  

I was pointing out that one of the examples you were using about the EU was already an unelected, unaccountable cunt who had been in the UK government. 

 

 

 

I think we can agree she is indeed a Tory cunt. 

 

Linking me with Kinnock and thinking I support Washi, is probably the biggest insult I have ever received on here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Scooby Dudek said:

Obviously crossed wires.

 

I knew the stupid Tory cunt had never been elected.

My presumption was you were implying it was wrong that once again, unelected, unaccountable EU cunts were able to make policy decisions about the U.K.  

I was pointing out that one of the examples you were using about the EU was already an unelected, unaccountable cunt who had been in the UK government. 

 

 

 

I think we can agree she is indeed a Tory cunt. 

 

Linking me with Kinnock and thinking I support Washi, is probably the biggest insult I have ever received on here.

Sorry, I do apologise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Millions of dollars has been raised from anonymous US donors to support British rightwing thinktanks that are among the most prominent in the Brexit debate.

American donors are giving money to US fundraising bodies that pass the donations to four thinktanks in Britain. A Guardian analysis has established that $5.6m (£4.3m) has been donated to these US entities since 2008.

The Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA), the Adam Smith Institute, Policy Exchange and the Legatum Institute have all received financial support from US backers via this route.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Section_31 said:

Millions of dollars has been raised from anonymous US donors to support British rightwing thinktanks that are among the most prominent in the Brexit debate.

American donors are giving money to US fundraising bodies that pass the donations to four thinktanks in Britain. A Guardian analysis has established that $5.6m (£4.3m) has been donated to these US entities since 2008.

The Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA), the Adam Smith Institute, Policy Exchange and the Legatum Institute have all received financial support from US backers via this route.

£4m over 10 years between 4 think tanks? Hardly big money is it? 

 

About the same as a Tony Blair speech a year each. 

Edited by rico1304
.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/24/2018 at 7:00 PM, Gnasher said:

Yes thanks, as I said never once elected,, unlike your presumption of the stupid Tory cunt being elected.

 

So we now agree baroness cunt chops washi has never been endorsed by the British electorate but seems (In your and Kinnock cunts eyes) to be a suitable Eu president!!

S

 

 

You haven't explained how citing two members of the House of Lords - one of whom has never had anything to do with the EU - supports your argument that the EU is in some way less democratic than the UK.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something I read yesterday but didn’t quite understand so maybe the good people of the GF can help...

 

The WTO rules that we’ll revert to in the event of no deal are rules/rates that we’ve actually negotiated. So if we arbitrarily decide not to apply them after Brexit it’ll be another indication we aren’t very good at sticking to deals.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, rico1304 said:

Something I read yesterday but didn’t quite understand so maybe the good people of the GF can help...

 

The WTO rules that we’ll revert to in the event of no deal are rules/rates that we’ve actually negotiated. So if we arbitrarily decide not to apply them after Brexit it’ll be another indication we aren’t very good at sticking to deals.  

I thought we didn't just revert automatically, our schedules have to be approved/agreed by the other 120 odd countries first? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, rico1304 said:

No idea. I’ve started following a bloke on Twitter who was a WTO negotiator for 20 yrs and he’s deepening my lack of understanding. 

Highlights that if the experts aren't all saying the same thing thrn how can the Leave MPs be so gung ho and confident about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This. Again.

 

40 years of UK Governments twatting the working class and getting their Fleet Street dogs to pin the blame on Johnny Foreigner - and Gnash is gullible enough to swallow the shit that the cunts have been feeding him.

 

Negged for associating someone as intelligent and principled as The Specials with your incoherent guff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...