Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Middle East Thread


Red Phoenix
 Share

Recommended Posts

Heh:

 

Russian President Vladimir Putin denounced the raids as aggression that will make the humanitarian crisis in Syria worse and called for an emergency meeting of the United Nations Security Council. Putin added that the strike had a "destructive influence on the entire system of international relations."

 

The Russians are like mancs, start on your bird in the pub then when you kick off pretend they were only joking and it's actually you that was out of order.

 

Fuck him and the coup de'ville he rode in on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thought you only need approval to deploy troops. In terms of sending a few RAF fighters over, the PM can do without any approval I think.

There’s no legal requirement for Parliament to vote on any military deployment, even the large-scale use of ground troops. It’s a convention that was started by Blair over Iraq, because it was so controversial he felt he needed the endorsement.

 

The Opposition can call for a debate on any military action, but it’s entirely up to the PM to decide whether there’s a vote. I expect a Corbyn government would seek to change this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always think our contribution to these things is a bit embarrassing though. The yanks will be dropping aircraft carriers on Belgrade or something and we'll have four, thirty year old bombers all being flown by James Blunt's cousins and at least one of them will get shot down and captured and appear on the front page of the daily mirror.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always think our contribution to these things is a bit embarrassing though. The yanks will be dropping aircraft carriers on Belgrade or something and we'll have four, thirty year old bombers all being flown by James Blunt's cousins and at least one of them will get shot down and captured and appear on the front page of the daily mirror.

 

Let's not have any more Mr Batchelors.

 

 

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/uk/2007/apr/23/military.davidpallister

 

 

The Royal Navy was forced to defend one of the 15 sailors taken hostage by Iran yesterday after pictures in Sunday newspapers showed Arthur Batchelor in a nightclub appearing to make fun of his ordeal.

 

Mr Batchelor, who sold his story to a national newspaper, became the butt of jokes when he revealed that he had cried when the Iranians, who called him Mr Bean, took away his iPod.

 

In one of the pictures, which were originally posted on the club's website, he is shown blindfolded with a friend pointing pistol-shaped fingers at his head.

 

Although the Mail on Sunday referred to him as the "hostage who learned nothing from his ordeal" and the News of the World branded his behaviour "shameful", the navy took a more relaxed view of his antics. "Arthur Batchelor has been through a very traumatic experience and is just letting his hair down," a spokesman said. "We do not police navy personnel in their own time."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Russia has been bombing Assad for four years? He’s done bloody well to survive then.

Yes. I thought that a strange comment but wasn't sure if it was one of Rico's cryptic 3-2-1 style joke posts.

 

Anyway, it all looks much ado about nothing. Limited strikes which won't really have a great effect on Syria's ability to carry out future chemical weapons attacks (or kill in many other ways) and likely limited by design to prevent any sort of escalation.

 

More done to try and enforce certain people's reputations to make them look tough and true to their word.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@OPCW: [emoji837] In response to media queries, the Spokesperson for the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) confirms that the OPCW Fact-Finding Mission (FFM) team is on its way to Syria and will start its work as of Saturday 14 April 2018. https://twitter.com/OPCW/status/984459594633285632/photo/1

 

Let's hope they never got bombed as they got there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not much, and it's not extracted by blowing up chemical weapons factories either.

 

 

By the sounds of that link earlier rather than just bombing their factories we could possibly have just exported the gases to them.

 

 

 

And im not saying there should be no intervention but imo it should be UN led after the UN checks the area and decides on action. Not just a US led attack

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By the sounds of that link earlier rather than just bombing their factories we could possibly have just exported the gases to them.

 

 

 

And im not saying there should be no intervention but imo it should be UN led after the UN checks the area and decides on action. Not just a US led attack

The UN is shite though, emasculated by George W Bush's decision to disregard it and wade into Iraq.

 

Been impotent for years before hand too. Ask Rwandans, Somalians and Kosovans what they think of UN peacekeepers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. I thought that a strange comment but wasn't sure if it was one of Rico's cryptic 3-2-1 style joke posts.

 

Anyway, it all looks much ado about nothing. Limited strikes which won't really have a great effect on Syria's ability to carry out future chemical weapons attacks (or kill in many other ways) and likely limited by design to prevent any sort of escalation.

 

More done to try and enforce certain people's reputations to make them look tough and true to their word.

I meant the brown people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@OPCW: [emoji837] In response to media queries, the Spokesperson for the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) confirms that the OPCW Fact-Finding Mission (FFM) team is on its way to Syria and will start its work as of Saturday 14 April 2018. https://twitter.com/OPCW/status/984459594633285632/photo/1

 

Good.

 

I trust there'll be a robust inquiry into the decision to take military action without parliamentary approval...

 

Hopefully it has a significant impact on Syria's capability to inflict these atrocities again, unfortunately they have plenty of further options on that front.

 

SD, I assume people's reactions are more to do with the fact they aren't keen on the potential for escalation with Russia. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once bitten, twice suspect I'd guess.

Maybe we just don’t like to see Theresa circumvent parliament to follow president orange fuckflump into a pointless escalation of tensions before an investigation has been allowed to take place.

 

Can’t fathom why some are trying to paint this as some kind of act of noble selflessness. There are quite clearly agendas at play, here. Don’t try and pretend we care about the slaughter of innocent civilians all of a sudden

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Struggling to work out why so many people have an issue with us impairing Syria's ability to murder its own citizens.

 

 

Maybe if Cable and Cameron had not granted export licenses for the agents to make the chemical weapons we would have a leg to stand on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...