Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Cardiff at Home


WhiskeyJar
 Share

Recommended Posts

Watched the game again and was stunned by Sahko's presence and performance. The first half he spent more time in Cardiff's half then ours, getting involved in attacks and breaking up their attempts to get out. Honestly can't remember the last Liverpool defender who played like that. His pass completion rate must have been pretty high, too, and he wasn't just laying balls off to the nearest teammate, either. Top stuff.

 

Suarez is raising the level of play amongst his teammates.

Everything that goes near Sakho he seems to win, looks a beast for the future.

 

After being 3 up it's going to be hard not to think the games won but no excuse for switching off

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fucking hell. Code is alive and well and still spouting bollocks.

 

Hardly, just showing what absolute bullshit you were writing. I notice you have no comeback to the actual goals conceded.

 

Theres stuff to improve on defensively for sure but making out like Clarke was some defensive genius and Rodgers has ruined all his work is hilarious and completely wrong.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest San Don

Hardly, just showing what absolute bullshit you were writing. I notice you have no comeback to the actual goals conceded.

 

Theres stuff to improve on defensively for sure but making out like Clarke was some defensive genius and Rodgers has ruined all his work is hilarious and completely wrong.

 

The only fucking bullshit written was you using Codesque stats to try and disprove a fact. So you think we are no worse in defence with the give away goals at set pieces we have conceeded?

 

OK, you believe the stats if you want but some people recognise the defence as a unit is playing worse than for some time.

 

No one is making clarke out to be a defensive 'genius' as you put it, and tell me where I said rodgers had 'ruined all his hard work' you fucking mef, yet another total overreaction on your behalf. You seem happy with the way the defence plays as a unit. Quote your stats all you want and going into hyperbole about defensive 'genius' but, that still wont mask the fact.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only fucking bullshit written was you using Codesque stats to try and disprove a fact. So you think we are no worse in defence with the give away goals at set pieces we have conceeded?

 

OK, you believe the stats if you want but some people recognise the defence as a unit is playing worse than for some time.

 

No one is making clarke out to be a defensive 'genius' as you put it, and tell me where I said rodgers had 'ruined all his hard work' you fucking mef, yet another total overreaction on your behalf. You seem happy with the way the defence plays as a unit. Quote your stats all you want and going into hyperbole about defensive 'genius' but, that still wont mask the fact.

 

I said theres hardly a difference, do keep up. Meanwhile your actual words were "all the fine work done by steve clarke is in tatters" yet theres only a minute difference in goals conceded. Think it was better under Clarke by all means, it was a tiny, tiny bit but what you wrote was rubbish.

 

A total overreaction by me?! I posted some stats and you've completely gone off on one resorting to insults and accusing me of being another poster.Yeah I'm the one overreacting.

 

Didnt say I was happy with the way the defence was playing either, infact if you actually read the post you quoted last I said theres stuff to improve on. I'm just completely disagreeing with the ridiculous post that Rodgers has ruined all Clarkes apparently great work. We have our defensive mares under Rodgers, we had our defensive mares when Clarke was here, did you not see QPR belting 3 past us in 15minutes? Us getting leathered for 3 at Bolton? Wigan scoring 2 at Anfield? Stupid switch offs at set pieces which cost us games like Blackburn, Utd at Old Trafford and many more, Tottenham putting 4 past us, West Ham putting 3 past us, christ even Scott Parker fucking scored!

 

As I said before and which you ignored, we have stuff to improve on defensively but the difference under Clarke is minimal and thats a fact and you know it which is why you've resorted to the insults.

 

How come as Rodgers has put all Clarkes defensive work in to "tatters" we barely concede any more goals? Surely it'd be much worse if Rodgers ruined such a great defence?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest San Don

I said theres hardly a difference, do keep up. Meanwhile your actual words were "all the fine work done by steve clarke is in tatters" yet theres only a minute difference in goals conceded. Think it was better under Clarke by all means, it was a tiny, tiny bit but what you wrote was rubbish.

 

A total overreaction by me?! I posted some stats and you've completely gone off on one resorting to insults and accusing me of being another poster.Yeah I'm the one overreacting.

 

Didnt say I was happy with the way the defence was playing either, infact if you actually read the post you quoted last I said theres stuff to improve on. I'm just completely disagreeing with the ridiculous post that Rodgers has ruined all Clarkes apparently great work. We have our defensive mares under Rodgers, we had our defensive mares when Clarke was here, did you not see QPR belting 3 past us in 15minutes? Us getting leathered for 3 at Bolton? Wigan scoring 2 at Anfield? Stupid switch offs at set pieces which cost us games like Blackburn, Utd at Old Trafford and many more, Tottenham putting 4 past us, West Ham putting 3 past us, christ even Scott Parker fucking scored!

 

As I said before and which you ignored, we have stuff to improve on defensively but the difference under Clarke is minimal and thats a fact and you know it which is why you've resorted to the insults.

 

How come as Rodgers has put all Clarkes defensive work in to "tatters" we barely concede any more goals? Surely it'd be much worse if Rodgers ruined such a great defence?

 

Well you got my quote about "all the fine work by steve clarke is in tatters" just about correct. Just another fucking shame you didnt add the bit about rodgers should 'sort his defensive coach (pascoe?) out' ?

 

Perhaps your grasp of English isnt so good? Or maybe you just like quoting parts of a sentence out of context to support your poorly reasoned point of view which after all, is based on Codesque stats?

 

Overreacting, well yes, you've done that not to mention incorrectly quoting someone. Perhaps you should add inaccuracy to your self analysis?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well you got my quote about "all the fine work by steve clarke is in tatters" just about correct.

 

 

 

I know, I've already proven that to be complete and utter garbage. We've established this and you resorted to insults as you had no comeback to it.

 

I notice once again you ignored all the football points like the horror shows and set piece problems under Clarke. I'm shocked!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest San Don

I know, I've already proven that to be complete and utter garbage. We've established this and you resorted to insults as you had no comeback to it.

 

I notice once again you ignored all the football points like the horror shows and set piece problems under Clarke. I'm shocked!

 

Hahahah! All you've used is Codesque stats that can be used to prove or disprove anything. Nice to see you acknowledge you quote out of context or even incompletely!

 

Carry on!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hahahah! All you've used is Codesque stats that can be used to prove or disprove anything. Nice to see you acknowledge you quote out of context or even incompletely!

 

Carry on!

 

If stats can be used to prove or disprove something you'll be able to easily find some that show Rodgers and Pascoe have ruined Clarkes great defensive work then wont you? But we both know you wont be able to and your only come back will be yet another insult, hahahahaha or accusing me of being someone else. Sad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...