Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Punchable Faces


Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...

Rory Mclroy. Speaking of which, after Van Gal banging on and on about no more commercial photo shoots, overseas tours etc and how its back to concentrating on football, Man utd have just announced the punchable prick Rory will be walking round the pitch with his PGA golf cup before kick off on Saturday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Van gaal or is it frank warren I don't know I get mixed up they both have heads that look like someone has shit in a condom.

One thing I've always appreciated about van Gaal is the flatness of his face.  Every time I see him, I can almost hear the reverberating KLANNNNNNGGG of the snow shovel that someone's just clocked him with.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As an example of someone who probably isn't punchable, but has a punchable face, I'd suggest Professor Richard Dawkins.  He's one of the leading authorities in a field that interests me a fair bit - in fact, he's probably the foremost living evolutionary biologist.  But he just looks so fucking smug.  All the fucking time.  And I know I'm wrong to let this cloud my judgement.  Seriously, "smug-face-ism" is no more defensible than racism.  But, still, I have never read so much as an article (let alone a book) by Dawkins, because... well, look at him.

 

Do a Google search on "Richard Dawkins not looking smug" and you'll draw a blank.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As an example of someone who probably isn't punchable, but has a punchable face, I'd suggest Professor Richard Dawkins.  He's one of the leading authorities in a field that interests me a fair bit - in fact, he's probably the foremost living evolutionary biologist.  But he just looks so fucking smug.  All the fucking time.  And I know I'm wrong to let this cloud my judgement.  Seriously, "smug-face-ism" is no more defensible than racism.  But, still, I have never read so much as an article (let alone a book) by Dawkins, because... well, look at him.

 

Do a Google search on "Richard Dawkins not looking smug" and you'll draw a blank.

 

I'd agree with most of this. He is a smug cunt though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...