Jump to content

MF - Members Forum

5,182 topics in this forum

  1. Other Football

    • 22,901 replies
    • 278,565 views
    • 13,117 replies
    • 265,615 views
  2. Summer Transfer Window 2013

    • 9,787 replies
    • 175,136 views
  3. Other Football

    • 9,743 replies
    • 138,227 views
  4. Summer 2014 Transfer Window

    • 9,469 replies
    • 176,834 views
    • 8,998 replies
    • 168,796 views
  5. New transfer links

    • 7,134 replies
    • 133,396 views
  6. Luis Suarez...

    • 5,965 replies
    • 114,775 views
    • 5,722 replies
    • 92,893 views
  7. Betting Fred

    • 5,416 replies
    • 34,441 views
  8. Summer 2015 Transfer Window

    • 5,253 replies
    • 95,080 views
  9. January window

    • 4,921 replies
    • 86,491 views
    • 4,061 replies
    • 100,782 views
  10. Fridge Magnet Friday

    • 3,915 replies
    • 65,978 views
    • 3,778 replies
    • 57,511 views
    • 3,599 replies
    • 61,784 views
  11. Carroll

    • 3,349 replies
    • 48,163 views
  12. Raheem Sterling

    • 3,258 replies
    • 57,031 views
    • 3,236 replies
    • 73,558 views
  13. Old Liverpool Pictures

    • 2,838 replies
    • 46,918 views
  14. Summer transfer thread - 2016

    • 2,744 replies
    • 56,716 views
  15. Euro 2012

    • 2,655 replies
    • 21,823 views
  16. Kloppo

    • 2,541 replies
    • 57,361 views
  17. Other football 2016/17.

    • 2,476 replies
    • 46,139 views
  • Available Subscriptions

  • Last Match Report

  • Latest Round Up

  • Posts

    • Changing your opinion because of getting negged = negged.
    • Scrolling through the forum on a phone and your thumb gently brushes on someone’s name and takes you to their profile page. When do you actually want to click on people’s pages here? Almost never. I think the only times I’ve genuinely wanted to click on profiles are if I'm sending a PM or they’re Top Lurkers. 
        Pisses me off, man. Happens multiple times every day. If I’ve been on your profile be safe in the knowledge that I’ve muttered “fuck sake” and had to press the ‘back’ arrow. 
    • Send her the Denmark before it’s too late then. 
    • Also, I guess it should be said for avoidance of doubt, I support any BA workers striking to get their pay back to the levels it was. It should be done immediately and automatically as soon as the business allows for it. Just incase anybody is retarded and thinks me talking about getting into government means 'fuck the workers'. 
    • So Gnasher, you quoted me in this post, but very little of it - if anything - has anything to do with what I actually said. So either you're making a general point after replying to me or you've misunderstood something I've said. Either way, I'll respond to it, if only to clarify my position.  The first thing I'll say, in response to the above quote is to ask 'what refusal to show support for workers using their democratic right to strike' are you talking about. If it's the one of incident of him saying he doesn't support workers who are balloting for a strike at BA, then fine, but unless I've missed something then David Lammy (as I confirmed over a decade ago on this site, 'I despise') hasn't made any blanket statement about not supporting workers or their right to strike. He did say he didn't support the BA strike. He has said on Ridge's show, that 'it would not be responsible opposition if I suggested [saying] yes to every strike' and 'I'm serious about the business of being in government and the business of being in government is to support negotiation' he said 'every dispute will be different' and went on to list differences. I mean, he isn't refusing to do it because they're workers or that he doesn't support people's right to strike. He just doesn't support this action. That can't be extrapolated out beyond the party not wanting to have front benchers joining picket lines.  Okay, as for your mandatory rush to defend Corbyn, I don't really see how this refutes what I actually said. He has always tried to stand up for the rights of workers, mostly by joining pickets and having photos with strikers and lending his voice to workers. That's all well and good, but it's roughly as useful as 'thoughts and prayers' are from republicans. He was Labour leader and tried to win an election twice. I would prefer somebody in government, who never had a picture with me, never stood never to me at a strike, and never lent me their voice but changes laws or introduced policies to help me than I would somebody to have a picture but I suffer. That should be particularly controversial outside of who it is being said about.  I mean, I can't believe this is in any way in response to anything I've said. I'm aware that strikes happen, I support people's right to strike, and I am fine with politicians supporting them. I'm fine with it right up until the point that it might stop them actually helping them properly. I honestly have the opinion that some people would sooner be out of government but shouting the right stuff than keeping quiet and being in government and changing the people's lives. I'd take Blair's doing something about it something over Corbyn's support but doing nothing any day, it doesn't matter that my politics are closer to Corbyn's than Blair. Real policy beats would-if-I-could every single time. 
×