Jump to content
tlw content
tlw content

"What did you make of John Henry's comments on Anfield redevelopment?"

    “I don't know if there is a next step because ticket prices are an issue in England. That may foreclose further expansion. We'll have to see.”
     
    Is that a threat, John? Sure sounds like it. Three of our writers react to JWH's latest comments, and unsurprisingly, they aren't happy... 

The team’s playing well, confidence in the manager is high, we’ve opened our new Main Stand; everything’s going okay so here comes someone from FSG to piss on everybody’s chips. John Henry’s comments, that the Anny Road expansion might not happen because of the ticket protest, shows once again how tone deaf FSG are to the plight of the modern football fan.
 
Henry was talking in New York where the Red Sox are playing the Yankees before the end of the regular season. The Red Sox will make the post-season and are a real threat to win the World Series. They’ll pack out Fenway Park for that and the secondary ticket market will hike up the tickets and no one will baulk at the prices. Why? Because US fans don’t look at ticketing like we do here. There it’s expected to pay top dollar to a big event, whether it’s worth it or not. Here, we expect things to be priced in reasonable relation to other events and, crucially, not to bankrupt us every time we go.
 
This is where FSG just don’t get it. They were apparently taken aback by the protest last year; that means they never bothered listening to the umpteen fan groups that told them that the prices were too high. They might be trying to attract the kind of customer that exists in the US but it doesn’t exist in British football culture.
 
Henry’s remarks smack of petulance, almost like “it’s your fault this is happening, you kyboshed our plans so either accept high prices or have no new stand.” It ignores that the season ticket list is currently closed because demand is too high. They have over 20,000 fans waiting for a season ticket; if even half of them took the option then the new expansion would be covered. But that’s not what FSG are interested in, they want more corporate clients, more people willing to be over-priced costs for a seat in the ‘LFC Craig Johnston Surfboard Lounge’ and not people who turn up late and buy little.

 

That ignores the fact that if we could 1) pay reasonable prices for decent alcohol 2) get served in under 10 minutes and 3) have a decent area to stand in, we might actually go in earlier. But again, that’s not the goal. You can pay $10 for a beer in a US ballpark – think of the mark-up profit!
 
No, John. The only reason the Anny Road wouldn’t go ahead is because you might have to fill it with regular fans who want to pay regular prices, and that’s not who you want is it? Feel good factor? Hang on, here comes FSG! Get ready to duck and cover. 
 

Julian Richards

@Juleswithnoname

 



 
F$G's head honcho casually slipped an indirect ultimatum to Reds into his stateside interview about redeveloping the Anny Road today: wind your necks in and pay up - or else! 
 
Frankly, I'm sick of people who aren't Liverpool fans telling us how to behave. Whether it's when to sing or what to protest about, no-one has the right to tell the fans what to do. We were here before you, we got rid of the last lot and we'll be here when you're gone. It's our club, not yours. Shanks' holy trinity explicitly did not include the money men, but this whopper clearly never got the memo. 
 
John Henry loves all that "custodians" bollocks, but what he really means is he wants to milk the golden calf for all it's worth while keeping the natives sedate. A rare slip of the tongue appears to have revealed his true colours now though: if you want more fans in here, it'll cost you. 
 
Well if more fans means empty corporate seats or arseholes who stay at the bar for the second half like at Hull and Leicester respectively, then you can keep 'em. More seats should be used to renew that "storied" culture you keep rattling on about, not to mention use to "monetise the brand" at every opportunity. 
 
If F$G were real custodians they would want to make the club accessible for kids and teens rather than corporate free-loaders. Rail seating/safe standing - or even just more seats - in The Kop or Anny Road could increase capacity significantly allowing young fans easier access for a lower price with the extra capacity offsetting the drop in ticket price - which of course shouldn't matter anyway in the context of this bloated, obese TV deal. 
 
Look around Anfield these days. Barely a teenager in sight. Back in the 80s it was full of them. Fifteen of us would get the train over to Sandhills, walk up to the chippy and then get in the queue on the Lads' gate for £1.50 entry. We then all stood together and had a fucking great time watching boss football. That was the life blood of our support but now it's long gone.
 
If the manager is sniffy about our vocal support, maybe he should ditch the lectures to those who fork out thousands to watch pampered millionaires lose and play badly (because that's been the norm for years, one Luis-inspired blip notwithstanding, no matter how cautiously optimistic six matches this year have made us). Maybe instead he should tell his employers that the best way to revitalise Anfield is to cut costs and get the kids in thereby wiping away in one fell swoop all the cynicism about this bloated, avaricious game we all secretly wish we could reject but can't. 
 
But no. John Henry wants to make veiled threats about our legitimate complaints. You'd think he'd tread just a little more carefully after recalling the circumstances that led to his acquisition of Liverpool, but clearly not even the minor burns on his fingers from the Main Stand pricing debacle made a big enough impression. 
 
He wants to be careful though. Not a single Red I know thinks we owe him and his mates a thing, but I know plenty who would turn on them in a second if they push us too far. 
 
So take some advice then John: stop fucking pushing. Listen to the fans. Understand you're not in America and this isn't baseball. We are Liverpool, not you and we want to watch our club. Using that as a stick to beat us with is likely to end up with you metaphorically getting whacked in the face. 
 
Football is not all about money; it's about a certain culture and Liverpool's is one of the strongest. How about you start appreciating that fact then? After all, that culture is the very reason why you bought us in the first place. 
 

Paul Natton

@OxtonSoulBoy

 


 

There's not much to add to what the lads have already put so brilliantly and passionately. I agree with all of the above and only an idiot would argue that FSG aren't in this for the money.
 
I'm not talking about short term, dip your hands in the till and trouser a load of transfer cash type thing, that's not what they're doing and to date they haven't taken a penny for themselves. That's not what they do, their whole plan involves raising the value of the club to eventually sell on for a huge profit.  
 
It's not ideal, but I could live with that as long as they at least showed certain considerations to the fans, without whom their asset wouldn't be worth jack shit. They don't though. 
 
When they announced the ticket price increase last season, those of us who spoke out against it (and indeed voted with our feet by walking out) were sneeringly told by some (usually those that never have to pay these prices as they never set foot inside Anfield) that this price increase was necessary if we wanted to be able to compete for the top players.
 
The argument was nonsensical, they didn't need that extra couple of mil the increase would bring to buy new players. They didn't 'need' it at all, they just wanted it. The ticket revenues were a drop in the ocean compared to the massive brand spanking new TV deal that was about to kick in, and they could have lowered prices massively and still been much better off than they were before the new TV deal, but still some know alls told us that if we wanted the top players then we'd need to stump up more for our tickets.
 
Yet despite all this extra cash the club didn't go on a massive transfer splurge this summer, they actually made a profit. In principle I'm good with that. If Kloppo can sign the centre half he wants on a Bosman instead of lashing £20m on one, great. If he can sign a keeper he likes for a pittance because of a release clause in his contract, jobs a good un. And if we can somehow persuade Bournemouth to pay £20m for a couple of lads who have no future here, well who am I to sniff at that?
 
If we can improve on the cheap, I'm all in favour of that. What I object to is that despite them bringing in all this money to compliment the massive TV deal, the fans don't get to wet our beaks even just a little. Where's our taste, John? Where's our taste?
 
While the club's balance sheet looks healthier than ever, we continue to get bled dry. You know how much my ticket is for a League Cup game this year? Fifty nine fucking quid. I emailed the club last week to tell them to shove it and to cancel my autocup membership. They just ignored the email and took the money anyway.
 
Why should they care if loyal fans who have been going to Anfield for years continue to walk away because they're being priced out. It's not their problem, because for now at least there are enough people waiting in the wings to take up any tickets that become available. And by the time that well has run dry (and it will) they'll be long gone, having trebled or quadrupled their original investment.
 

Dave Usher

@theliverpoolway


User Feedback

Recommended Comments



If they genuinley want to sell, from a business perspective, they would be cutting their nose of to spite their face.

 

By not building the new stand they would be stunting the growth of their asset and giving any buyer leverage to beat them down by £100millions.

 

I cant see them risking losing that level of profit just to hide behind ticket prices.

 

It was a ridiculous thing to say but surely there must have been some form of context in conversation. Or was he being interviewed about the Red Sox and just blurted it out.

 

Either way, our John is a bit of a slippery customer who has a tendency for causing ructions with the odd barbed comment.

 

He also has a very fit bird

 

Fuck him.

 

Im too made up with Klopp and the boys to focus too much attention      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This feels like being put on the naughty step, or being told you're getting a boss bike for Christmas only to find a fuckin tangerine and a lump of coal under the tree.

 

You got a tangerine ?

Lucky cunt

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they genuinley want to sell, from a business perspective, they would be cutting their nose of to spite their face.

 

By not building the new stand they would be stunting the growth of their asset and giving any buyer leverage to beat them down by £100millions.

 

I cant see them risking losing that level of profit just to hide behind ticket prices.

 

It was a ridiculous thing to say but surely there must have been some form of context in conversation. Or was he being interviewed about the Red Sox and just blurted it out.

 

Either way, our John is a bit of a slippery customer who has a tendency for causing ructions with the odd barbed comment.

 

He also has a very fit bird

 

Fuck him.

 

Im too made up with Klopp and the boys to focus too much attention      

 

 

They are not giving any buyer leverage to knock them down by £100m.  That's just silly.  And they are not silly. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are not giving any buyer leverage to knock them down by £100m.  That's just silly.  And they are not silly. 

No, they're deffo not silly but they are human and every now and then make mistakes...hiring BR, the 1st season transfer saga, not getting in a decent MD etc etc...all well documented and all discussed ad infinitum

This is another of their mistakes in my opinion

I've always doubted they'd re-build the Anny but with the obvious success of the new Stand I'd began to hope they'd change their mind

The sums mentioned concerning our valuation of £1 billion are pie in the sky at the moment and I'm sure they know this but with a winning team and further investment in the stadium it might actually happen

Speculate to accumulate 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nightcat is gutted he didn't manage to last on here til now. This was everything he ever worked towards. I bet he's jizzed all over his map of shipping lanes within the Indian Ocean.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see it as letting down gently, Stringy. They could have just said the cost benefit ratio doesn't justify it. The ticket prices comment was a swipe at the protesters last year. Hopefully it will serve to wipe the cobwebs out of the eyes of those fans who still go on about how they arrived like knights in shining armour to save us.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see it as letting down gently, Stringy. They could have just said the cost benefit ratio doesn't justify it. The ticket prices comment was a swipe at the protesters last year. Hopefully it will serve to wipe the cobwebs out of the eyes of those fans who still go on about how they arrived like knights in shining armour to save us.

 

 

I'm not sure about knights in shining armour, but they were the only credible show in town, and I'm glad they took us over when they did.  I don't think they've done much wrong, apart from the bluster about 'here to win things' but then again, I wasn't expecting them to do anything that they couldn't justify from a financial return perspective.  Investing an additional 250m into the team in order to give us a chance of winning the league was never a starter, because the risk to them isn't worth it.  

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 great articles, Paul's sums up my feelings almost perfectly bar the last sentence.

 

"After all, that culture is the very reason why you bought us in the first place".

 

They've never given a flying fuck about our history, passion or culture.

 

The only reason they bought is the fact we were a bargain they'd quickly make a profit on.

 

They'd have bought any business or 'soccer team' regardless of if the ground was a quarter full if there was money in it.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry Paul, that sounded arsey when I thought it was a brilliant piece and summed up my thoughts perfectly.

 

I actually reckon you meant was "that culture" was what you (the owners) banked on from the very beginning.

 

To them it was just an advertising point to make more money.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A point I'd also make about their experience of the American sports and sports fans is their acceptance of being financially raped.

 

How many of those fans travel to follow their club/team?

How many of their fans take time off work to follow their team?

 

If away support is not realistic/possible are FSG (and American owners) expecting 'home' fans to be prepared to pay twice as much based on their dollars to head ratio?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Either way FSG can fuck off.

 

I don't mind owners coming in and making a profit, fucking hell Moores and his family did all the way through our greatest triumphs.

 

What I don't like and won't accept is some cunt that doesn't even know the game trying to treat me like a patsy and lying through his teeth expecting me to swallow his shite and then say thank you John after.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These are my rather rudimentary maths.

 

New stand £115M

New stand revenue p.a. £20M

Naming rights £5-7

If the owners did absolutely nothing to try to recoup the costs of the new stand other than keep the revenue from the main stand alone and keep prices where they are, it would take about 4 years for the main stand to pay for itself.

 

New ARE £50M - Ian Ayre gave a ballpark figure

New ARE revenue p.a. £10.5M based on increase roughly to 13,800 (current capacity 9000 with expansion of 4,800 added seats)

Naming rights estimate £2M

Again, let's say we get a new ARE by 2018 - 4 years to pay it off

 

Domestic TV Deal worth £5.5bn Overseas TV deal approx. £3bn (Totalsportek)

 

If we finish 5th (I know, not great) but still £132M for 2016/2017. That's the domestic TV and overseas combined (prize money divided by 20 clubs + live tv appearances + where you finish in the table).

 

Add roughly £3M from player transfers this season -  £135M isn't that bad. They can take £100M back for the stand, and maybe put £35M into the new ARE build. The following season, they can take £50M (remaining cost from Main and ARE builds). Give us some money for player transfers and even reduce ticket prices by 2017/2018. 

 

Again, I'm just playing around with numbers, so I'm naive as to how this all actually works. I know it's not as simple as that.

 

However, I'm not buying that the ticket protest at the Sunderland match last season has any correlation with putting 4,000 new seats in the ARE, or, raising ticket prices. Even if they spent the entire 'prize' money on paying themselves back for the Main Stand this season, and we had to rely on player sales revenue next season, I still don't see how a ticket protest prevents them from starting the ARE build while doing exactly what they did to build the new main stand in the first place. I am obviously missing something here.

 

If they have no stomach for owning a premier league club, then sell. Admit that at least.

 

Thanks for buying us in 2010, though. That was awesome.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This feels like being put on the naughty step, or being told you're getting a boss bike for Christmas only to find a fuckin tangerine and a lump of coal under the tree.

You got a tangerine ?

Lucky cunt

We were so poor we had to share the lump of coal and it was on the fire by boxing day
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry Paul, that sounded arsey when I thought it was a brilliant piece and summed up my thoughts perfectly.

 

I actually reckon you meant was "that culture" was what you (the owners) banked on from the very beginning.

 

To them it was just an advertising point to make more money.

 

Yep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are not giving any buyer leverage to knock them down by £100m.  That's just silly.  And they are not silly.

 

 

 

Why? New owner lowers price of club due to stand needing redevelopment to the tune of 100m

Link to comment
Share on other sites

tumblr_l7w9rsRIcd1qzlngto1_1280.jpg

 

Hi. You're going to call off your rigorous ticket price hike. You're going to publicly state that there are no internet terrorists. Or... these guys are going to take your balls. They're going to send one to the New York Times, one to the LA Times press-release style. Look, the people you are after are the people you depend on. We buy those tickets, we eat your Dunkin' Donuts, we buy shit from Liverworld, we drive up your revenue streams. We guard your fiscal position while you sleep with Linda. Do not... fuck with us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...