razor

Prescience - I called this on Wednesday...

I'm not a massive fan, but I love this moment - Syd Barrett and (The?) Pink Floyd.

He wears bloomers. Hardly a term of affection / respect, that, mate!

Did you not run?

Without reading any of the post past the first line - I mean, I just can't.... - the answer is that our players take too long to get shots away, and also just hit it with little hope of the ball hitting the net. I believe Americans call it a Hail Mary? I don't need stats, I can see it every week. It's like someone has crunched a load of numbers and said, "For every 10 shots you take, one goes in" so they just tot up a total and hope for the best. A quite divisive forward of ours does this perpetually. In fact, two of them do.

Great podcast. I listened to it in two halves on different days, and the arc pretty much matched my own processing. That said, I thought I was low when I started it, but bloody hell, I wanted to take Paul out for a pint and a packet of crisps during that first 20 minutes! The anger and the acceptance were also in there, so in reply to the question, do people really want to listen to these unpacking-of-the-misery podcasts, honestly, yes we do. Personally, I find it cathartic, mate. As a final point, I was also duped by the romance of Barcelona: in a world of cynicism and commercialism, in 2008-12 or something like that, they seemed to be a glimmer of hope. I now hate Barca more than I hate Madrid, and that is saying something. It stems from the duplicitous outward-facing masquerade. "More than a club" - yeah, alright. Més que un club = masquerade.

We should get one of those text to speech voices to read this thread out. It should be set to "Morgan Freeman documentary" mode, and be read over the background music of "Ebony and Ivory" by Stevie Wonder and Paul McCartney.

When he hit a purple patch recently we thought we'd got a player. He's gone off the boil at the worst possible time. People saying the assist wasn't good, though, are just cynical. He won an aerial ball in the box and put it into a dangerous area. Maybe he needs a rocket up him again - spend a bit of time as an impact sub. Also, I am still irritated that he hasn't learned better English by now. He's consistently divisive, I'll give him that.

His little reversed/angled balls into space for the player running beyond him are as good as ever. He's brilliant at that. But that right footed slice in the six yard box in the second half is more typical of his current form. It was poor. It was better than Nunez's awful slice, though, so there's no point in selling him. If he was out injured, there'd be a 50 page thread on here begging for updates on his comeback to the side.

Arsenal will put 6 past that Man Utd team, mate. We're not clawing that difference back. The truth is, they beat Sheffield by about 7 or something, they beat us, and they'll bury the mancs. I've changed my mind about them, and they will probably deserve to win it. Edit: confession about Arsenal - uncomfortable as it is.

Honestly, I've been wondering this - the sheer size of Klopp is one of his assets. In western cultures, like it or not, big people always have an advantage over smallies. (I'm a smally and I'm telling myself this is the reason I've never got to the top. For me, it's certainly more pertinent than my caustic personality, sallow social presence, poor dress dress and questionable personal hygiene.)

$175m - not to be sniffed at.

Late new wave. The Long Ryders - "Looking for Lewis and Clark"

You probably know it already, but there's a podcast dedicated to debunking Alex Jones' every utterance. To be fair, it's like shooting fish in a barrel. They just play a short clip of his latest syndicated radio show, then mock / abuse / disprove what he says in that clip before moving on to the next clip. It's called Knowledge Fight. Don't bother with the weekly episodes if you don't have time, but if you do have time to listen to one (maybe two!), episode 703 (and 704!) is brilliant. They uncovered the audio from Alex Jones' show on the day of 9/11. It's incredible. He gets his friend on who is a financial advisor who was in an adjacent building. He basically builds him up as an expert "structural engineer" as, probably as part of one of those mixed programme arts degrees, he'd done a course. I won't spoil it all, but when a "special guest" comes on it changes gear again. Spoiler alert: he blames 9/11 on the US Government. Then on Iraq. Then on Iran. Then on Osama Bin Laden. Then back on the US Government. Then on the EU.