Tevez - who wants him here?

[fowler9]

Here's what I would do.

 

We buy him now for £25m which is what City want. We then sell him in the summer to AC for £21m which is what they are willing to pay, so effectively you are paying £4m for a "loan" deal for 6 months. You make sure AC and Tevez are in agreement.

 

It's a win win situation for everyone. Tevez gets match fit and helps us into the CL, AC get a player that is ready for the new season and fit at the price they wanted to pay and Tevez gets the move he wanted and City get the money they wanted.

 

Football. It really isn't that hard.

 

And if he picks up a bad injury we're stuck with an uber cunt?

[navbasi]

And if he picks up a bad injury we're stuck with an uber cunt?

 

Only until the following window and the insurance would cover his wages.

[The Dude Abides]

Only on a short term loan.

[Red Hot]

Exactly all 3 parties win.

[Peflecan]

I can literally see no downside whatsoever to a loan deal, Man City won't have to play us again this season, as we've had our home and away in the Premier League, and they are out of both cups, so if anything, Liverpool having Tevez would actually be of benefit to them, we still have to play Chelsea/Spurs/The Mongrels, so any points we take from them, will be good news to City, and of course some June 30th they'll have a fully match fit player to sell.

 

I see nothing but a mutually beneficial loan move here, Gods knows why so few share this opinion, yes he's a dick, but a very fine player.

[Guest davelfc]

We have to play spurs, mancs, chelsea and arsenal. Now we know we can beat them without the bellringer but obviously with him it would be a little easier you'd think.

 

All would help citeh and of course keep tevez match fit and in the shop window. It might even help tevez as the whole Suarez shitstorm has a while to run so he can hide under that.

 

Still don't think it will happen of course, but it makes sense.

[silverlining]

I can literally see no downside whatsoever to a loan deal, Man City won't have to play us again this season, as we've had our home and away in the Premier League, and they are out of both cups, so if anything, Liverpool having Tevez would actually be of benefit to them, we still have to play Chelsea/Spurs/The Mongrels, so any points we take from them, will be good news to City, and of course some June 30th they'll have a fully match fit player to sell.

 

I see nothing but a mutually beneficial loan move here, Gods knows why so few share this opinion, yes he's a dick, but a very fine player.

 

Nobody is disputing that he's a good player, but one has to consider the "dick" element, his £200,000 a week wages, the fact that Shitty have said they won't loan without a firm "buy" confirmation in summer, Tevez wants to leave English football and Italy is a preferred destination and alos the fact that he won't be joining us, on loan or otherwise, so what's the fucking point in discussing it?

[gingerhulk]

seems milan have just signed some kid from chiasso, gab marcotti thinks he will take up the last non eu place, meaning tevez deal could be off

[Peflecan]

Purely hypothetical from my point of view which I neglected to mention in my post, £200k p/w on loan if available for a player of that quality is a no brainer imho, unrealistic or not at this point.

 

I'd love to see him play for us, even if just for 5 months or so.