Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Recommended Posts

Trump appointing a man who's 2007 book was entitled  "Surrender Is Not An Option" as National Security Advisor...  

 

It's only going to end one way...

 

 

tenor.gif?itemid=6118939

If you read Napoleons essays on war he always said that any commander should always insist surrender was not an option. To simply have it as an option meant it more likely in the event of misjudgment or cowardice. It was always a correct decision if tactically justified.

The Japanese had a similar mantra. As much to intimidate the enemy as to prevent the act of surrender itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think for the first time since Trump got in I am genuinely worried he may kick of something that spins rapidly out of control and involves use of nuclear weapons, The Russia probe is getting close and driving him mental , He is looking for a conflict to divert attention and kill it off, 

I would not like to be the meat in the sandwich living in Seoul or Tehran right now . The worst part is he has fucked up everything he's touched and the law of unexpected consequences may well signal disaster for all of us, He needs a bullet in the back of the head sooner rather than later I'm afraid for everyone's sake. Even that space cadet Pence is looking like a good option right now.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you read Napoleons essays on war he always said that any commander should always insist surrender was not an option. To simply have it as an option meant it more likely in the event of misjudgment or cowardice. It was always a correct decision if tactically justified.

The Japanese had a similar mantra. As much to intimidate the enemy as to prevent the act of surrender itself.

And how did that work out for them?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think the American population does clamour for war to be honest, probably the opposite, that's where hippy culture started. They're just dominated by a particularly hawkish legacy of warmongering politicians.

...who they keep electing.

 

Still, I'd love to hear more from the folks who argued Hillary would be more warmongery. They seem to be conspicuous by their absence these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Napoleon won more victories than Alexander the great, Hannibal and Julius Cesar combined. Is regarded as one of the first and greatest military strategist. The Japs got nuked.

 

 

Indeed.

Not to mention the Napoleonic code, which basically set in stone and perpetuity, a blueprint for a more fair and secular Europe, which guaranteed the rights of individuals to give or not give a fuck about God on their own terms.  Which was a big deal in those days, and not bad for a dictator, warmonger and, some alleged, an anti-Christ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you read Napoleons essays on war he always said that any commander should always insist surrender was not an option. To simply have it as an option meant it more likely in the event of misjudgment or cowardice. It was always a correct decision if tactically justified.

The Japanese had a similar mantra. As much to intimidate the enemy as to prevent the act of surrender itself.

That's Napoleon, this is John Bolton we're talking about who's a fucking loon and a man who even North Korea called human scum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...who they keep electing.

 

Still, I'd love to hear more from the folks who argued Hillary would be more warmongery. They seem to be conspicuous by their absence these days.

 

Do they though? Trump's shtick was that the was going to be insular and get away from being the world's policeman. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sasas beat me to it. Most of the warmongers like Cheney and Bolton Did their best to shirk any service but love to send other parents kids out to war and give no fucks at droning and bombing innocents.

 

Though Bolton supported the Vietnam War, he declined to enter combat duty, instead enlisting in the National Guard and attending law school after his 1970 graduation. "I confess I had no desire to die in a Southeast Asian rice paddy," Bolton wrote of his decision in the 25th reunion book. "I considered the war in Vietnam already lost

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do they though? Trump's shtick was that the was going to be insular and get away from being the world's policeman. 

 

 

Yes, but being "the world's policeman" is the "honourable" lie and line of justification - for self-interested militarism - that every President before Trump used as justification for being international thuggish cunts.

 

Trump may have promised not to be the world's policeman and to be insular, but I don't recall him saying he wasn't going to be an international thuggish (cowardly, hypocritical, self-interested, insert any other familiar cuntish adjective for most US presidents in perpetuity) cunt. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trumps motivation is very simple. Brand Trump.

Will it increase his saleability? This is a business opportunity. Make a buck pure and simple.

Body bags coming home will not.

 

 

Body bags coming home has usually constituted a roaring trade for US Presidents though.  Trump might be too thick to envision that of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reagan sold B movies, but became a decorated international arms dealer (scrap metal merchant and French cabaret chanteuse).

 

Perhaps there's hope for our boy Trump in a second term.

 

Chubby Cheeks over on the Korean Peninsula is a potentially captive market.  There's no money in nuking him - sell them to him instead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Napoleon won more victories than Alexander the great, Hannibal and Julius Cesar combined. Is regarded as one of the first and greatest military strategist. The Japs got nuked.

There was only 1 undefeated General in the Anglo-French wars of the 18th and 19th century and it wasn't Napolean

They only ever faced each other once at Waterloo which was such a crushing and decisive victory that peace broke out and lasted for nearly 100 years on the European continent

Napolean was a monster who was directly responsible for the death of millions of people and he got smashed to pieces by a mad Irish man and a filthy rabble of an army made up of 'the scum of the earth'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was only 1 undefeated General in the Anglo-French wars of the 18th and 19th century and it wasn't Napolean

They only ever faced each other once at Waterloo which was such a crushing and decisive victory that peace broke out and lasted for nearly 100 years on the European continent

Napolean was a monster who was directly responsible for the death of millions of people and he got smashed to pieces by a mad Irish man and a filthy rabble of an army made up of 'the scum of the earth'

 

 

And in the same 18th and 19th centuries, Britain's empire - characterised by the Duke of Wellington's mad older Irish brother in India - was indirectly terminating millions of lives by enslavement, throughout her glorious territories on which the sun never set.

 

And yet she found the generosity to spare the Napoleonic monster, with a nice Atlantic superannuation to boot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was only 1 undefeated General in the Anglo-French wars of the 18th and 19th century and it wasn't Napolean

They only ever faced each other once at Waterloo which was such a crushing and decisive victory that peace broke out and lasted for nearly 100 years on the European continent

Napolean was a monster who was directly responsible for the death of millions of people and he got smashed to pieces by a mad Irish man and a filthy rabble of an army made up of 'the scum of the earth'

Never said he won them all. Think he lost 6 out of 30. Mainly at the end of his time.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was only 1 undefeated General in the Anglo-French wars of the 18th and 19th century and it wasn't Napolean

They only ever faced each other once at Waterloo which was such a crushing and decisive victory that peace broke out and lasted for nearly 100 years on the European continent

Napolean was a monster who was directly responsible for the death of millions of people and he got smashed to pieces by a mad Irish man and a filthy rabble of an army made up of 'the scum of the earth'

Think you'll find that Richard Sharpe won the Battle of Waterloo while Wellington looked on in admiration.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...