Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Van Dijk or Keita


Bjornebye
 Share

Van Dijk or Keita?  

51 members have voted

  1. 1. Van Dijk or Keita?



Recommended Posts

Klopp won't sign a purely defensive midfielder. Since he has been i cant think of a legit link to a defensive midfielder.

 

Thats why i think a player like VVD is so important. He can play,good in the air,good pace and plays on the front foot. He is ideal for the way we play. We will never be a Spurs or Chelsea conceding 30-35 goals but if we can stop the brain dead mostakes Lovren,Moreno, the keepers etc have been making we will get the extra points needed to put up a challenge while still playing the fast,attacking football we do

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Klopp won't sign a purely defensive midfielder. Since he has been i cant think of a legit link to a defensive midfielder.

I agree - and I don't view Keita as purely a DM.

 

But he would have a massive impact on our midfield, would strengthen us in an attacking sense as well as defensively.

 

VVD would not have that kind of impact, as much as I rate him and want us to sign him too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If VVD can offer the Carra/Staam/Terry type of leadership at the back, plus more of a defensive threat in the air, he might well have a massive impact. If we can add tough to break down, hard to score against and resilience to our decent, face flowing attack, we could be in for a wild ride.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've changed my mind on this.

 

Henderson and Can are more competent in their position than Lovren and Klavan. An injury to Matip and we're up the creek again. A centre half is essential, and hopefully it's Van Dijk.

 

This is where my own view is slightly conflicted. Like you say, I think signing a CB is absolutely essential but a CM less so but still desirable. However, I'd rather sign Keita + a different CB than Van Dijk + a different CM because I think Keita looks a much better signing than Van Dijk in isolation. Keita looks like he could be a transformational player for us whereas Van Dijk just seems to be a very good centre back, plus there are more question marks over him and his price for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's pretty much how I see it too. For me the 2 most important positions to fill were another top forward (Salah) and a CB. I think we have enough midfielders of decent quality to get by if we needed to, but as you say Keita could be a transformational player (I've not seen him play, but from his stats and the clips I've seen, he seems pretty unique), and it is those special players that can really make the difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...