SOS Statement

[theRedHorse]

Originally Posted by real red

I actually think Rashid reads posts properly more than some.

Feel free to correct me. I'll hold my hands up if i've misread something.

[real red]

Originally Posted by theRedHorse

Feel free to correct me. I'll hold my hands up if i've misread something.

I was referring in particular to your "who gives a shit / dog eat dog" comment and how it related to my original point. Still...

Here's an example of the blame going to the wrong person anyway -

Liverpool fans make their point over new stadium - Liverpool Daily Post.co.uk

According to Sons of Shankly, that was 440 days ago.

Chair Neil Atkinson said: “We want to emphasise to people that there’s a vast chasm between what Gillett and Hicks say and the reality that turns out to be.

“Hicks initially said that a spade would be in the ground within 60 days of him getting in. It’s now 440 days, and so we’ve come down to help them out.”

But....

icLiverpool - LFC buyers back £215m New Anfield

Mr Gillett said: “If we are to preserve the grants – and we are extraordinarily appreciative of the community grants – the shovel needs to be in the ground in the next 60 days or so.

That's not an attack on Neil either, but it was the first example that came into my head. As I say, it's easy on a forum to get away with not checking stuff, but it's a bit more serious if it's on behalf of something like SoS.

Everyone at the club seems to mention lawyers these days too, so there's another reason to be wary of misquoting anyone.

I wonder if Rick Parry's actually answered any calls from his lawyers about the letter?

[theRedHorse]

Originally Posted by real red

I was referring in particular to your "who gives a shit / dog eat dog" comment and how it related to my original point. Still...

Here's an example of the blame going to the wrong person anyway -

Liverpool fans make their point over new stadium - Liverpool Daily Post.co.uk



But....

icLiverpool - LFC buyers back £215m New Anfield



That's not an attack on Neil either, but it was the first example that came into my head. As I say, it's easy on a forum to get away with not checking stuff, but it's a bit more serious if it's on behalf of something like SoS.

Everyone at the club seems to mention lawyers these days too, so there's another reason to be wary of misquoting anyone.

Meh...

Originally Posted by real red

I wonder if Rick Parry's actually answered any calls from his lawyers about the letter?

Feel free to elaborate mate. Don't talk about others not being transparent enough and then throwing cryptic shit out like that. Again.

[real red]

Originally Posted by theRedHorse

Meh...



Feel free to elaborate mate. Don't talk about others not being transparent enough and then throwing cryptic shit out like that. Again.

When was the last time you laughed?

[theRedHorse]

Originally Posted by real red

When was the last time you laughed?

Long ago.

[Karl]

Originally Posted by Karl

RASHID IS A COCK.

Let's find out.

I can't believe RedHorse neg'd me for this, after I've been nice to him.

Twat.

[RedinSweden]

The problem is Rash, you consistently view everything as black and white. If someone makes comment about DIC then they are immediately in favour of Hicks. Your love of DIC (no pun intended) has clouded your judgement. We were too trusting last year when G&H took over. We need to learn from this and anyone wanting to get involved and make money out of LFC needs to viewed with a critical eye. Dismissing anyone who questions the motives of DIC as Hicks sympathisers is really counter-productive.

I want DIC to invest if it means that they are better than Hicks. If not, then I want someone else. If that means putting up with Hicks if he manages to get full control then so be it. The current situation is so damaging to the club it hurts.

[theRedHorse]

Originally Posted by Karl

I can't believe RedHorse neg'd me for this, after I've been nice to him.

Twat.

Thats the point of this reputation system, right?

someone makes a bad/abusive/annoying post you and you Neg them. That way they think twice before doing it again


I'd expect you to do the same with me.

[Dirk]

Notice how RedHorse only negs non-Muslims? Racist.

[theRedHorse]

Originally Posted by Dirk

Notice how RedHorse only negs non-Muslims? Racist.

Ahahaha.... ha.... aha.....


...


...


ha...

[Lofts]

Cheers SOS for the update. keep the good work going

[Vladi]

Originally Posted by Rashid

realred, I respect you more than I do most on here but it saddens me to see you become a Hicks sympathiser.

Rashid, you've posted some serious shite on here in your time but that takes the fucking biscuit.

[wiiksie]

Originally Posted by Vladi

Rashid, you've posted some serious shite on here in your time but that takes the fucking biscuit.

Whilst Radish is a prize knobend (and once again acted the prick here), he looks positively charming compared to the psycho nutbag of the moment, RedHorse.

[theRedHorse]

Originally Posted by wiiksie

Whilst Radish is a prize knobend (and once again acted the prick here), he looks positively charming compared to the psycho nutbag of the moment, RedHorse.

*Stops rocking back and forth singing 'Wind the Bobbin up'*

How dare you.

*Continues rocking back and forth singing 'Wind the Bobbin up'*