Avram Grant is blind

[Captain]

Either that or he's trying to outdo Mourinho when it comes to outrageous claims:

But Blues boss Avram Grant said the defender did not deserve to see red, claiming he "went for the ball".

WTF?!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/foot...em/7160652.stm

[Ted]

That was a disgraceful challenge,if he'd hit Agbonlahor full on he'd have killed him in the knees.

[Captain]

I think most managers would accept that "tackle" as a straight red. If not, they'd just keep their mouths shut.

To come out and say what Grant did is unreal. What a fucking idiot!

[StevieH]

Avram Grant looks like the Toad out of Wind in the Willows.

[JER]

He is also a hypocritical fuck

From last week

Grant said: “Crouch didn’t need to do it. I don’t think Rafa was angry about the red card, he said something about something that happened before.

“I respect him a lot. He is a very good manager. Maybe he was angry. But first it was a bad tackle and second the number of the fouls Liverpool made on Mikel in the first half was about seven or eight.

“The priority is to protect players from bad tackles that can hurt them. I didn’t see Mikel kick Crouch but even so he didn’t need to do what he did.

“This game is a wonderful one. It is one you need to play aggressive and you need to play fast. It is not easy for the referees. If you look at videos of the game five years ago, you think they are in slow motion.

“The game has developed a lot because there are more athletic players. I like the players to play aggressive but I don’t like players to hurt others, especially when they don’t need to do it.

“The tackle on John Terry against Arsenal on Sunday and on Mikel today - the players did not need to do it.”

[Ted]

Originally Posted by JER He is also a hypocritical fuck From last week Grant said: “Crouch didn’t need to do it. I don’t think Rafa was angry about the red card, he said something about something that happened before. “I respect him a lot. He is a very good manager. Maybe he was angry. But first it was a bad tackle and second the number of the fouls Liverpool made on Mikel in the first half was about seven or eight. “The priority is to protect players from bad tackles that can hurt them. I didn’t see Mikel kick Crouch but even so he didn’t need to do what he did. “This game is a wonderful one. It is one you need to play aggressive and you need to play fast. It is not easy for the referees. If you look at videos of the game five years ago, you think they are in slow motion. “The game has developed a lot because there are more athletic players. I like the players to play aggressive but I don’t like players to hurt others, especially when they don’t need to do it. “The tackle on John Terry against Arsenal on Sunday and on Mikel today - the players did not need to do it.”

The simple looking goosefuck.

[bigredruss]

heard the interview on sky last night, god how 2 faced can you be. saying the ref got the big decisions right, he did ballack cheating and elbowing barry in the face. hope they get done for harresment of officials again with a points deduction to stop them doing it again

[Ted]

Mick Dennis was on SSN today. He said he felt sorry for Phil Dowd because he never had John Terry in his ear telling him how he should ref the game. Ha.

[Ulysses Everett McGill]

The name of the coach may have changed but little else has.

Classless fucks

I hope they all catch bad aids

[Kopite]

[Red Nick]

[Ted]

Go in fancy dress to your New Year's party.

[TK421]

He's only protecting his player.

[bigbak]

Good to see that Mikel recovered from the life threatening tackle from Crouch from about a week ago.

Credit to Carvalho for apologising.