Originally Posted by Kennys_spell
I don't "Know" all this, but what makes you think there are 'additional' laws that apply to business and when anything is bought in business the ability to dispose of it anyway you want is somehow limited as you're sugesting? When you buy a car, is there any limitations on what or who you can sell it on to?
|
You can't just dispose a business in any way you want to, when you have bought the business in a "50/50 partnership". When you buy a car with half of your money and half of someone else's money, you can't just sell the car to anyone you like. You have to get some sort of agreement with your partner on who you can sell the car to - since your partner has also invested in the same car.
The Predicted Profits that Hicks can see in the future, the predicted Profits he's trying his hardest to hold onto. Why else do you imagine that Hicks is fighting so hard to hold onto the club?
|
I was talking about the situation in 11/12 months time - not in 5 years time. If Gillett has already stretched himself NOW, he will be nervous about the situation in a year's time. I don't have a clue why you are on about future profits when it is clear Gillett wants to sell NOW.
Justify it anyway you want but it's still "IF". "IF" can have a positive outcome as well.
|
Sure. Time will tell.
I'm not asking you to trust anyone, I'm simply questioning your logic for arriving at some of your assumptions/guesses. It's easy enough to make a positive guess at the "best possible outcome" - Try this - D.I.C. buy us and through shedfulls of money at us allowing us to get back to where we belong. I don't want to argue how likely that is with you but you have to admit it is a possible outcome of the "IF" argument.
|
So, you can arrive at a positive guess/assumption based on what Gillett and Hicks have promised/done so far? I'm truly amazed. Oh and just for the record, I won't trust DIC either until they prove me wrong.
Anyway, I'm bored of it all now. I'm off to look at some tits.