[Ulysses Everett McGill]

Originally Posted by Cardie The majority of fans are happy to pay money to murdoch, is their not enough you can have a go at them for without trying to push it to the extremes? The S*n is the boycott, beyond that it's down to personal preference many supporters read the NotW and the Times/Sunday Times, pay for Sky TV, use My Space, have watched Fox News, Watch the sunday supplement despite it being sponsored by The S*n Personally I don't buy the S*n or NotW but do watch Sky, Have read the Times, have watched Fox channels, have looked on My Space, and watched the Sunday Supplement despite the S*n adverts. It may be hypocritical to boycott those two and watch/read the rest but then what can I do, to me the S*n is up their and it's links with the NotW are clear, the res is tenuous at best. If that means myself and thousands of other supporters are 'beyond the pale' then so be it.

So hypothetically you would see nothing wrong with Hicks et al trying to soft soap the fans and as part of that trying to build better relations with either the HJC and HFSG (Imo by even speaking to Freud they have established thier amount of knowledge on the subject.) or even both whilst on the other hand paying a firm who's headed up by someone who's married to the daughter of Rupert Murdoch and would probably advise on any "soft soaping"?

Doesn't sit well with me that.